Sunday, September 08, 2013

 

32. LEAVING IT ALL AGAIN - Book Two

60. I still believe in deliberateness, which surprises me, for in all actuality I am rather haphazard. Perhaps I just tend to think I'm deliberate; or, on the other hand, perhaps I just pretend to think I'm haphazard. Either way, the manner it which it comes together is often surprising. Most of my family life, as I see it, was all haphazard; I don't know that my parents ever planned anything out, at least in my own years there  -  things got quite a bit different after the mid-1970's (I was long gone by then)  -  the family had grown, there was more money around for them, and the remaining family (3 young kids left), began taking trips and things to places like Florida, etc.  -  real 'vacation' stuff. But when I was young, I remember my father coming home on Fridays with a cash pay envelope, making $125.00 a week, before deductions; they'd talk about it, and manage to eke out a 1950's week of food, gasoline and whatever else, bills, etc. My mother seemed always ailing  -  there was an awful lot of pharmacy stuff always going on  -  the local 'St. George Pharmacy' used to deliver and I recall often the delivery guy at the front door again with a bottle of this or that  -  pills, elixirs, and the rest, just like some pizza delivery or something. I don't really know how one person could always have been so sick; my mother went through a lot of prescriptions and doctors and stuff. She had an odd kind of faith and religious zeal in doctors and medical prognosis and such. Dr. Slobodien, Dr. Homer, Dr Mayer, to name just a few. They used to make house calls too  -  I remember the little black medical bag with the flip-open top each of them had. All the usual childhood illnesses as well  -  they ran through my sister and myself, brought a stream of what seemed like too much doctoring. Measles, mumps, chicken pox, darkened rooms, vaporizers  -  it seemed pretty unreal. I believe my mother to have been a hypochondriac, with a character weakness for taking solace and confidence  -  in an almost religious fashion  -  from medicine and medical people. None of that was ever passed on to me, and I protest a disgust for the medical profession, as hucksters and cheats. The entire faux-'pharmaceutical' industry has, in fact, long ago sold out and contributed to the destruction of the old, American fabric.


At first, when we moved to Avenel, it was just 'Perth Amboy General Hospital', 10 miles away, and nothing else within the area  -  that's where all the doctors were based, their offices were (lots of office visits, as well as the house calls, which were a soon to disappear, a quaint vestige again of an older Americana'). Over the river (the Raritan) and thus south of Perth Amboy (called 'South Amboy'), there was a small satellite hospital, a vestige of the one in Perth Amboy, and where it started actually. It went like this: in the clay-pits/meadow area of swampy South Amboy, about the time of 1950, there was a munitions factory and  -  much like the Jersey City one in WWI Black Tom  -  previously mentioned way back  -  it too blew up; about in May, 1950. The 'emergency' factor of that explosion required the commandeering of one or two large homes for the emergency medical treatment stations  -  from this commandeering came the genesis of an actual 'South Amboy' hospital. [ South Amboy, NJ Munitions Explosion, May 1950 | GenDisasters ... Genealogy in Tragedy, Disasters, Fires, Floods ] and some of the buildings there were later absorbed into hospital use; at first it was all rather quaint, looking something like a military encampment medical center, with house and sheds pressed into use. Eventually it lost all that look as new buildings and modern facilities were built, the hospital's footprint vastly enlarged, and only one of the original building now still stands  -  what once must have been a not so shabby, tall, three-story mansion sort of home. It can yet be seen from Route 9, in use, at the rear of all the rest of the facilities.


Perth Amboy General served the entire area, right up until the 1960's, when the hugely burgeoning population and development of the area necessitated a new, larger, and more modern facility  -  it was built and named (of course, for the times) 'John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital'  -  referred to ever after as JFK. There was a great deal of duplicity and criminality involved in all this  -  I only found out much later and, of course, no one ever followed up on anything  -  but JFK became a huge profit-making facility, far surpassing Perth Amboy. In time, by the late 1980's, JFK Medical Center' as it was then re-named, had absorbed all these other facilities and it was all re-named again as Raritan Bay Medical Center. Now a huge, multi-faceted, sprawling group of emergency medical, medical care, 'wellness' facilities, operating almost as for-profit granny-care. Plying on pathos, billboards and such dot the area. The funniest part of it all now, as well, is how so many personal-injury and 'Team-Law' establishments (ambulance chasers?) and their office buildings, have sprouted up in close proximity to each of these sites, as well as the ubiquitous, facetiously earnest and unsightly as well, Rite Aids, Walgreens, CVS and the others  -  which facilities have appeared, literally littering streetcorners all about. Pill-pushers, false injury lawyers and treatment centers  - a veritable industry of scorn and abuse, of everything.


A rabbi acquaintance of mine, Rabbi Alfred Landsberg, late of Temple Emanuel, Edison, NJ has been the Rabbi, since 1968, of the Temple. Actually, he's just retired (in June, 2013). I used to do his printing. Temple Emanuel abuts and has always abutted the JFK Hospital sprawl. He's never addressed this, nor has any of this become debatable public discourse, but merely ONE of the transgressions here run as follows : In 1966/67, the very 'active', shall we say, town fathers of what became Edison, NJ  -  a small coterie of names which became the same names, the same group of men, councilmen, small-time mayors and developers, simply began scooping up and putting together, for great profit, the parcels of land needed to develop what became Edison. In this case, the area where the new hospital was going became a gold mine for them, as well as what were called 'Parsonage Village', Menlo Park Mall, Kensington Gardens, Inman Grove Shopping Plaza  -  the list goes on. I here stop. Anyway, these same people granted to what became Temple Emanuel a parcel of land on which to build. They granted it for one dollar, with the stipulation of Temple-use, undeveloped, in perpetuity. During this time, these woods became extremely valuable because of the hospital's growth and sprawl  -  ever-expanding, it supplanted diners, restaurants, homes, storefronts, and woods for its office buildings, expansions, parking lots, etc. They thus proffered for themselves the 'guarantee' that nothing else would usurp their own future profiteering off this land, granted for a dollar, in perpetuity, but by the mid-90's sold instead back to the same parties for development. Millions of dollars were turned over, money turned hands, development contracts, etc.  -  all the same names of the same entities and people and their successors interacting; their development companies, their concrete, asphalt and steel contracts, and all the constituent construction union contracts. Much it, in addition, backed, secured and partially financed by government, discounted construction and medical grants, and the like  -  all unjustified and lots of it unaccounted for.


In line with this, abutting the border of Edison and Woodbridge, (less than 2 miles, heading North on Rt. 27 (the old Lincoln Highway)), right at MetroPark, called so now, I once knew a family there, the Coopers, of Coopers Farm/Dairy. Long ago obliterated, long ago gone; but in the 1960's, mid, you could still go there and see the cows and the rolling acres of working farmfields under cultivation and as pasture and meadow. Theirs was the last remnant of what once was a thriving agricultural area. The Coopers, before there was a MetroPark, had all of their land ending at the old, small, Iselin train station. When they got out of their farms, I guess age or retirement or whatever,a lot of these folk (the Coopers and others) had ceded the lands to Woodbridge, in perpetuity, as 'Woodbridge School Lands'  -  meaning they were to be (only) dedicated to the use of schools and educational, not profit-making, uses by the town. Not a school was built, nary a one  -  in fact, through the manipulations of real-estate names like the Alfieri's, Berg's, Yelensic's and others  -  names that were once powerful forces locally, as Yelensics and others also were for the hospital area, vast fortunes were made in turning over this land, into what is now acres and acres of corporate headquarters, plazas, tenanted buildings, parking garages and  -  valuable because of all the commuter proximity, the MetroPark train complex. All of this is a huge undertaking, dirty and political, and it represents many hands feeding at a crooked trough. I mentioned previously the who and what of Larry Campion and the Independent Leader and all the local graft and corruption of Woodbridge. Take it from there.


I'm not carrying this to the mat  -  let me just say  -  but this was all the land and place I was given, the location of my thought and mind. This was only one little place, and the endemic nature of this all far surpasses the tiny nature of what I've related -  it's gone on everywhere, always. Everything is based upon lies, corruption, deceit for money, misrepresentation, stealing and corrupt politics. It's a cohort's game, deal and deed  -  one after the other  -  played and messaged by dirty, foul people. Politics is an insider's club. You get into it all so that you can feed from this trough just described. You spend a million or five million, or more, to campaign for a job paying one thirtieth of that amount back  -  all so that you can get set up  -  double-dealing, being cut-in on contracts, zoning variances, re-evaluations, land distributions, corporate boards and connections, speech-making tours, influence-peddling schemes, sweetheart deals and the rest. It starts out small, and goes crazy from there. All the while, what little is needed from you is that you stay on the 'right' side of things, talk change and sympathy while in reality changing nothing and in truth sympathizing with nothing except your own interests and concerns. The United States, despite all the platitudes and religious crap and crowd-pleasing speeches and malarkey, is and has always been nothing but a den of bullshit. All those people involved  -  let me say  -  can take all their platitudinizing and political/corporate bullshit, roll it up, shove it up their asses, shit it out, and then shove it back up, for all I care. They would deserve it. And they would deserve bathing in their own shit too. Why should I mince words?  -  after what I've here described, I'm disgusted all over again. Before I leave this subject, however, and to reiterate once more how I said 'Government'  takes over the places of real import and covers over what must be concealed, look at 1924 Nixon Nitration Works disaster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia  and see, for a start, another local disaster that turned into a suspicious goldmine for names like 'Levine' and the others. Read about it   - the location 'Nixon', now subsumed nicely into Edison, still exists, and all of the referentials in the small article still are current. The government has done a nice job of covering everything over, building commercially all over it   -  known as 'Raritan Center'  -  and making millions for hundreds. I detest America, and I detest every bit of the factional and coarse co-option and lies and falsifications that go on. I detest America, not for what it was, not for how it began, but for what it has become  -  a tyrannical autocracy of shysters, liars and deceivers willing to fleece and abscond with whatever they can from the public-be-damned-public, as long as they can get theirs. We have been taken over by an occupation army called Government. It operates without compunction, while just pretending  -  going through the means and the maneuvers needed to keep the wool pulled over the eyes of a dim-witted and bloated, mindless public. Had I my power, I'd take the sword to it, right now.


Unfortunately for the rest of this world, I was placed here, in some fetid swamp of a place to be called Avenel, just to see it being taken from me. I was supposed to applaud this. I guess I forgot.


I guess, too, I can remember being untroubled, but it must have been a long time ago. There was a time when I'd look at my grandmother's eyes  -  the only grandparent I ever had face to face; she'd come and stay with us, from Bayonne, every so often  -  and try to ascertain what a life must have been like to been lived so long ago, to have witnessed so much change and turmoil. Of course, now I see differently. I'd think to myself that she was a girl without cars and electricity and plumbing and all of that, then I'd realize, well, maybe, maybe not. Then I'd understand that she had readily accepted all that no matter. It seemed to make no difference to her. She would arrive to see us on a bus and a train ride, two train rides actually (it was a difficult switch from Bayonne by rail after taking the bus to the Jersey City train station, then to Newark to switch for Rahway, then at Rahway to switch for the Avenel stop, and then the walk to the house), then get right to work cooking  -  some usual preparations for a Sunday meal, cooked or prepared anyway on Saturday night while sitting us kids and having some TV stuff going  -  Lawrence Welk, Ed Sullivan, any of those dumb variety shows; I don't know. That was what it all meant being in the 20th century? Born in 1900, to see that, to witness that? If given a choice, I might have said : shoot me. What is it all when we have the nothing at all? When we play-act through life, having families and roles and livelihoods and practices of Self, but all without any feasible sense or direction of within, of creating, of nurturing something greater than life? It's said Mothers attain bliss by having children; that's their moment. Sounds wrong to me. Same with fathers; broken on the shield of labor or expectation, compounded by fatherhood. Does still sound wrong to me. Like all the know-it-alls who've not done any of it and say I'm wrong. Or right. These aren't categories, they're opinions.

61. Sometimes I've felt as if my life was a marathon and I was (desperately) trying to become a marathon runner  -  which never happens in a moment. So, one just gives up and breaths heavy, trying to compensate  -  air and airflow, ever important. I admit, I'm now getting pretty close to the finish line, but I somehow only now am beginning to realize : there's no ribbon there to break. All this stuff has been said a hundred times   -   'you can't go home again', 'don't look back', and the rest. Whatever. My reply? 'Lake Mead is man-made [.'Lake Mead - Lake Mead is the largest reservoir in the United States in maximum water capacity. It is located on the Colorado River about 24 mi (39 km) from the Strip]. Which means nothing except 'I'm here, always.' And Hugh Romney was Wavy Gravy [Wavy Gravy - Wavy Gravy (born Hugh Nanton Romney) (born May 15, 1936)]. Those are my answers, for the absurdity of each. No, you didn't ask, but I'm telling. 


It's something like words and images, haunting things  -  the distance between present and past. That gap can never be closed. I'm not lost in it, believe me, but the essential core of my being  -  the 'what' of what I am today, is somewhere within it; dressed in thought, decorated with colors. As such, I address it. As an artist and a writer (believe me, I am both) those are the raw materials I work from  -  not to scoff at pining for things gone, just using it as clay. Not James Joyce's 'Dubliners' clay ('Clay'), just rather, the malleable, the moist. In Freud's words, it is melancholy, or unresolved mourning, that unsettles us. I don't know about that, but I'll accept it.


"The yearning for the past that poets and painters often evince is also latent in the longings of scholars who have devoted their intellectual lives to history writing, to invoking that which came before but is no longer. The poignancy is especially acute for historians of art. In the sight of old objects that continue to exist materially in the present, but whose noisy and busy existence has long since been silenced, there is something profoundly melancholic. Such a state of mind is easier to feel than to define. Many psychoanalysts (from Freud to Melanie Klein, and the object-relations theorists who've taken her up), have explored this quiet, brooding aspect of the psychic life. Some have even linked it to the uncanny phenomenological experience of being enveloped by a work of art, what has been called, by Christopher Bollas, falling under 'the shadow of the object...the sense of being reminded of something never cognitively apprehended but existentially known.'


Of course, I am far from the first to emphasize what has been regarded by many as our quintessential postmodernist predicament. The 'rhetoric of mourning' that has engendered so many late twentieth-century studies in the humanities is one devoted to the incomplete and the missing: fragments, allegories, ruins, retreats from definitive meanings. Yet the practice of art history provides and oxymoronic twist to this by-now-common characterization. The very materiality of objects with which we deal presents historians of art with an interpretive paradox absent in some other historical inquiries, for works of art are at the same time lost and found, past and present. As Martin Heidegger once put it, 'World-withdrawal and world-decay can never be undone. The works are no longer the same as they once were.  It is they themselves, to be sure, that we encounter there, but they themselves are gone by.'...The quest for lost origins, for example, has lain at the heart of the history of art ever since the discipline itself originated. On this ground alone, the typical art historical enterprise seems predestined to be a melancholic one.  It is not just a matter of trying to retrieve forgotten historical meanings or neglected artists.  Seeking to situate provenance, identify individual intentions, relocate physical settings, decipher underdrawings and situate works of art back into their cultural and ideological contexts are all commonplace indications of a compulsion  to recover a certain something long since forgotten or abandoned. The concept of 'melancholy writing' is especially  apposite for reflecting on this  underside of the art historical enterprise....' (taken from The Melancholy Art: (Essays in the Arts) by Michael Ann Holly (Feb 24, 2013) 'Mourning and Method').


So, anyway, I've spent a lot of time reclaiming things. I've enjoyed each minute of doing so, and remain proud of it all, like a sad firestorm, out of Avenel, and place that never really did exist. Commodore Vanderbilt is buried in some out of the way gravesite in the back-bowels of Staten Island. At the time he was placed there. it was a completely different, and far more exalted, place. The gravesite of Walt Whitman is in Camden, NJ, in a rather beautiful location, nestled within an interesting graveyard, yet a graveyard now in a hideous location  -  some of the end-result of America's dissemination of trash and garbage. I wouldn't send my worst enemy there, though I go myself. The grave of Stephen Crane is in Elizabeth, NJ, the grave of Allen Ginsberg is in Newark, as is that of Al Aronowitz. Delmore Schwartz and

Isaac Bashevis Singer are in Emerson, NJ. Herman Melville is buried in the Bronx. That's but a few of the names and graves I've gone to, return to, and can tell you about  -  not one of them is in a place that has remained what it was back then. The cemeteries themselves perhaps have remained pristine and well, but in the getting to and fro of each (for the living, yes) everything has been altered  -  in the space of Time and Place, the origins of these graves no longer exist  -  neither do the ways and means, the evocative associations, the emotions that went into them. If anyone, therefore, says that Time is not a flexible membrane, they are wrong. Things are underway all of the time with alteration, change, and - yes - transfiguration. I have lived amidst at least three or four versions of Time, and the local realities it produces. At least three or four, and that does not include the stranger liquification of reality and all its proofs that took place for me in the hospital, undergoing coma, and reawakening to this field of Life and Time.


One time, out behind my house on Inman Avenue, probably about 1959, we kids found a small encampment of drifters or hobos or bums, whatever the word would be. There were maybe three or four of them and they'd clumped together in a little encampment around a small fire-spot they'd worked. There were a few bundles of clothes and things, as well as a few pots and pans on a string of some sort  -  they carried these things around with them. We were young kids, unsure of what to make of this  -  it was still the days of the many acres of cornfields and the cover and protection from being really seen that the old cornstalks provided. These guys took advantage of the cover and, were it not for our usual traipsing around and bungling about, we'd not have seen them. I guess we were easy to flummox or push off  -  we never told anyone about them, or at least I never did  -  no police or anything ever came that I knew of. We were always told, as well, to be aware of and watch out for railroad police, referred as 'railroad dicks' somehow, but we never saw any of them either. Whatever occurred, or didn't, these fellows disappeared after a few days  -  presumably they just kept going along their way. They never bothered us or scolded us for finding them out, just talked regular small talk  -  probably the same way they'd done a hundred times before to annoying kids who'd found them out. On the tracks, in the section out behind my house, there was, in those days, a railroad call box on one of the electric-power poles. It was for rail workers or conductors or whomever, to use for emergency calls into the railroad dispatch or nearest station yard. 'Emergency phone', it was labeled. I never saw it in use, though I admit a few times we kids pranked it  -  once you lifted up the phone it was live, into some station or another  -  as we'd picked it up, make wild noises, or say something horrible, and then run off. Lucky, in  our way, I guess to have never been caught doing that. But, anyway, if they really wanted us they could have posted a train dick there, watching for us. By the way, being kids, the idea of railroad cops being called 'dicks' was a hoot. Another time, a friend two houses over, Barry Wynne (mentioned earlier in the re-design of the flag episode) claimed in all earnestness that he'd seen a UFO land  -  in those little woods, pretty much right where the hobos had been. We all believed him, and it caused quite a stir amongst us kids  -  sweeping the woods, claiming to have found burned rocks, landing rubble, weird piles of things. It was funny, and it went on for two or three Summer days and evenings at least. Then it was just over; as we'd decided they must have packed up and lifted off again, when we were unawares. You need to remember again that this was the farmland of the Rahway Prison yard  -  a veritable bucolic and agrarian playground for us all. Bows and arrows, slingshots, treehouses and forts, hollowed out cornstalk tee-pees. The place was littered with boyhood anarchy and, if we followed the tracks and the lanes or paths, it all led to the junkyards and the trailer park in one direction or, in the other, the lumber yard (all open and unfenced, easy to access) and the train station. One direction was Rahway, and the latter direction took us towards Woodbridge. I think I should probably mention another direction as well  -  for it loomed always  -  nearby and never far enough away, always too coyly enticing and insincere for all concerned, what I Iiked to call 'the Rackets'  -  these rackets being school and church, those two ever-looming sewers into which all of our waters were being sucked. I want to say drawn, but I say sucked.


It was funny to me then, and still sticks now, how easily it went for us, as kids, boys, to credibly make a case for the appearance and presence of that UFO thing in the rear of our yards. We'd been able to both casually and with some credulity convince ourselves of the 'evidences' we found  -  scorched rocks; flattened and burned ground area where, we swore, the craft had settled; little pieces of this or that left behind. We had everything but the little green men, or the one they'd forgotten to pick up. For the remainder of my life I've found, since, most of the rest of reality (or what it's so-called) has the same traits  -  we harbor faith and find truth in things we're told, without any real evidences at all. From that, we garner and bind up our operative sets of beliefs and notions with which we pass the rest of our emotions and judgments upon the life and the days we lead. Until Death do us part. Fanciful stuff; glimmers of hope, foundations of satisfaction. Essential notions of 'Freedom' and 'Salvation'. It all becomes very firm and very simple because of each interlocking piece which we ourselves have finely connected. It's easy to say it was just kids' stuff, but, remember, it was President Richard M. Nixon (the 'M' stood for 'More of an asshole you could never find') who so profoundly said (and the press picked it up) 'you need to treat the American people as children, for that is what they are and how they think.' Astutely fiendish, coming from a brittle politician, yes, but in ways very true too. Much of that was present in this entire episode. A crafty political type knows soon enough, as if dealing with a child, just how much to 'suggest' or plant the 'idea' of something and let the hearers do the rest  -  'change', 'tax-reform', 'military reduction' and the rest. It's a perfect slide game  -  slide in, never really touch the bag, just let them think you did  -  and they'll deal with the rest for you.


One last thing  -  dealing with this UFO or alien thing. In the same way I've presented it with Barry Wynne as balderdash, there are thousands and thousands of others, nationwide, who would believe this story in an instant  -  because it would buttress and bolster their already prevailing believes in dead aliens, government cover-up, and the rest. [July 7, 1947, Area 51, Roswell, NM  Roswell UFO incident - The Roswell UFO incident took place in the U.S. in 1947, when an airborne object crashed on a ranch near Roswell, New Mexico, on July 7, 1947. Explanations ...]. Now however, I am here myself to refute my own just-reported disbelief. What I just described really did happen. There was a landing, and visages and beings appeared. They spoke to me, and implanted in me some further knowledge and awareness, from which I still source things. In addition, let me add, the appearance of those hobos was no accidental thing  -  they had been brought there, without their own awarenesses of what was going on nor of what was happening, or about to be, happening to them, they had been grouped and drawn to the location they were found at, and were, in a few days time, gathered and taken up from that location I just related, as swiftly and surreptitiously as the landing itself had occurred. A long time ago, in a galaxy far away  -  except it was no 'Galaxy', which is where the UFO'ers get it all wrong. They are still thinking in earthly, provincial, rational and scientific terms. It's not place, or galaxy or space or location. It's dimension; and you can't get there from here, as the old Vermont farmer would have said. Let me add, 'not on your own anyway.'

62. I think I took things too seriously. Maybe. When I learned, for instance, about Capitalism  -  in all those little stupid, school ways  -  it seemed about people making money from and, living off of, product-generated money; income. The basis of the economy was production, small corporate structures, all as successors to Jefferson's yeoman farmers and the rest.  If you know, Alexander Hamilton founded Paterson, NJ at the time of about 1795-1800 and on, as a dedicated 'City of Industry'  -  natural water-power included (all destroyed now and the functioning water power once forming the 'Great' Paterson Falls a mere, power-valve controlled yellowish flow of piss, running through wooded walkways both dangerous and disgusting  -  food trash, used condoms, broken-apart baby strollers and shopping carts). I was there in the 1960's, 1970's and right up to the present day. I've seen all this take place. The death and grime, has been now somewhat cleaned up by Government and Parks Service fiat but yet made worse. Americans, as a group, obviously can't hold well to their tenets. The only functioning businesses now in places such as Paterson are worked-over bodegas, quicki-marts, Hispanic food places, bars, hospitals and a few Governmental and bureaucratic infiltrations, broken-down school buildings, traces of industry, and as many new and 'yuppified', or whatever it would be called, condos and living units built with transformed old mills, factories and silk and embroidery buildings as can be had. A remnant of the past stupidly exists in the idea of the Railroad Museum near the Falls, which blindly celebrates a transportation and power-energy past so long gone as to be laughable. Speaking of laughable, there's a larger than life statue of Lou Costello, of 'Abbot and Costello' fame, who was raised in Paterson, NJ. What's become of the American system of 'Capitalism' is a wreck. There's no longer much capital involved. You were once supposed to get rich and make your way on money made by product, yes, and the profits generated. Made money. Now most of it generated into  -  not Made Money  -  but 'Taken Money'. The American Dream is now to work for the government, at any level, state, local, national. That's where the money resides  -  wages, benefits, pensions, an entire afterlife of living, early-retired and well taken care of. There are hundreds and plus ways of doing this  -  living off tax-generated money, as if there were no end to it. (Powerful unions crank their strangleholds on all these endeavors.) One municipal NYC project now underway, which I have just been reading of, is going nowhere and is way over-budget, having lost all semblance of its original and projected attempt, mainly because of the internal battlings and machinations of twelve (count 'em, twelve) different unions within the one huge job, all operating at cross-purposes to each other, trying to endlessly pad the payrolls, erecting barriers to open-hiring and clear-functioning and efficient installation and completion of job duties and details. Project management has about gone mad, the municipal commonweal suffers, and the project gets waylaid, while thousands make off to the bank with their purloined funds and salaries, squeezed from the municipal fountain, thought to be endless. Add to this cops, teachers, social workers, criminal justice attendants, judges, lawyers, firemen,  advocates, functionaries, and actuaries to the fact. And then add it all again into itself by a factor of two. That' what I've learned of Capitalism in Avenel's fine America. And that was something like 50 years ago. It's much worse now  -  the entire Military establishment has come to be considered a grand job and a wholesome career. That's evil, man, just evil.


We've become a nation of dependents; everyone looking for gravy and glory off the Government. That's 'Government' with a capital G, as in Monster. That's no way to live. That's living off money stolen from others. And at 'profit's point : and they're not even secure about themselves, this Government. Take your car to West Point, and see what they do to you and your vehicle at the main gate. You're suspect just showing up there. This all  began for me with my Aunt Millie, who was a Democrat Commiteewoman from Colonia. For our family and friends, in time, she became  -  through all her references and name-droppings  -  the go-to person for anyone wanting a job. This was perhaps 1963 and on, during the LBJ Great Society years. Right about then there were so many well-padded, make-work jobs and programs set in place that most any kid of age 16 with 'working papers' (that always sounded so strangely collectivist, or something, to me) could be hired, through a myriad of programs with names like 'Project Outward Bound', Project Bowtie, and even 'Green Acres'  -  these were local, Woodbridge Township jobs, and many of these were given out through my aunt, who was more than happy, in fact felt it her duty somehow, to put local kids on the local Woodbridge Township Parks & Recreation program for something like 50 or 60 bucks a week (not so shabby for junk Summer work back then). These were nothing jobs, entailing little  -  mostly as stupid, local-park attendents for daytime kids' programs  -  singalongs, leather weaving, beading, sports, dance, swing and sliding-board programs, coloring and drawing. Essentially it was all outdoor baby-sitting for children, aged maybe ages 5 thru 11. The point I'm making is how many people flocked to this  - no one thought twice about origins, where that money came from, what it all meant, where they were headed because of it. Least of all my Aunt Millie and her local politics nitwit partners. I can recall a few Woodbridge Democrat Committee picnics and parties, at places like Merrill Park and other spots. All these local-booster types would come together, arriving and sitting in as heroes and giants  -  throwers of largesse and money. Hirers of patriotic, idiot kids seeking civic satisfaction through getting paid for doing things like working in the parks, clearing and cleaning townships lands, organizing refuse clean-ups, the whole shebang. It was all more than that, and it was less too. It's a sort of illicit age to have this stuff happen at  -  adolescent boys and girls, of a prime sexual-learning age, as Park Leaders. Right. I personally know of a few happenings and stories of jaunts into the woods between park workers and co-workers, and others, to further the fine quest for civic betterment, while the other kids were on the swings. The potential search for Life's true happiness, inherent in Capitalism always, was grandly served in this manner.


Michael Heizer was represented by the Xavier Fourcade Gallery. That was maybe on east 82nd Street, something like that, right off Fifth Ave. at the Metropolitan Museum. Heizer was born in 1944 and, along with Robert Smithson, who died in 1973, I think in a plane crash over one of his sites, he's one of the predominant artists involved, through the 1980's until now, in a movement which came to be called Earthworks  -  essentially massive and monumental scale art having no longer anything to do with gallery space, canvas or painting. It's a something-else-entire 'art'. This sort of Art (capital A) involves large sums of money, purchases of large tracts of land, moving and changing of earth and soil, through heavy equipment, explosives, blastings, rock cuttings, crews and workers. It's well-documented, and so far abstracted, in a way, to be past the point of abstraction and back again into reality and particle soundness, so specific as to be dirt, rock and soil in someon'e hands. Not always the 'Artist' per se, but someone close. 'Art' per se has had to cross so many bridges over the centuries that it's sometimes amazing to realize that this is so. Almost revolutionary in effect  - original oil paintings, large-size recreations of battles and allegorical scenes, mythologies, religious events and imaginings. These themes were later changed to military and battle scenes used to bolster the State, ruling families and family members, wealthy patrons and Popes. On the other hand, and at the same time, the 'artistic' battle was over representation, progressive means of painting, categories of line and color, perspective, depth  -  everything working directly and hard within the confines, whatever size, of the canvas. The 'canvas' was considered 'space', 'arena'. It was what could be 'bought' by the wealthy collectors of the day. The extremely wealthy, or the 'grand' organizations of church/state could have walls and ceilings, entire buildings, painted or theme-decorated by hired artists  -  allegorical paintings, scenes of victory or advancement. That became  -  for them  -  the 'canvas', in much the same way as stretched and squared canvas was. For a few centuries, that was it  -  then, in its day, upon the arrival of each, changes began conflicting things, sprouting up, causing schools and 'studios' to form around their own themes. This went on and on  -  all the differing viewpoints and opinions  -  selling and being auctioned ever higher, as Art itself became both the endeavor (as usually happens with wealthy idiots) and the commodity or product to be traded, sold, bartered and used for status and display. Voila! We then arrive at the grand 'Museum' scene. Eventually all of this  -  once sorted out  -  brought us through and into the 'modern' day, with its Armory Shows (1912) and all the breakaway and dissenter schools of art. Notwithstanding yet the popularity of all this, and all them, people still clamored for collecting and for possession  -  prices skyrocketed, all through the 'millions' and more. Of late, more and more of nothing and nothing has occurred, at higher and higher acceptance and pricing. One of the offshoot movements which occurred, and merely one, was the Earthworks movement, mostly headed by Smithson (who'd written a grand book early on about this developing 'subject', about Passaic, NJ) and Heizer. Smithson died, some of his works survive. Heizer still lives, with large works underway. (Go to DIA Beacon, in Beacon, NY, to see a splendid Heizer piece, installed in place). What I'm getting at, and need to do so in order to explain my point, is that  -  over time and by detailed effort  -  what is considered "art' has long ago left the canvas and the measured confines of same. I was never with that. It lost me a while back. My days in art-time were spent within confines  -  just like the art  -  and my theorizing and learning and experiencing Art, for and within myself, has always remained within, inside  me. My 'being' associates art with darkness and confines, psychological situations and terrors and doubt and guilt. My artist-characters, from all of the past, are of that type  -  the dark, brooding, strange, psychological character types  -  none of that wide-open, airy lightness of broad, almost random, strokes of Earth-moving and the predilection for all of that odd, theoretical figuring and conceptualization that must be presented with it. Art without confines just isn't Art for me. I need the frame and the space, the confined and the measured  -  it is within that space that best can be played out the creative roam and fronting of the terror that keeps us. It's definable, explainable. viewable, and  -  most importantly  -  with its bordered size, even if quite large, one can still stay with the shape and with that confine and gauge the art within your own self, playing. So, I never learned the 'Out of Confines' art. It gets too mixed up anyway with other things, modern things, complicated things  -  motors and machinery and dredging and flight. In DIA Beacon, where Smithson also is well-represented, there's a pile of thick glass, in ragged shards, on the floor, somewhat in a heap. It's part of the Smithson oeuvre they keep there, and it's easily viewed, as is all the rest, Smithson and Heizer; listening to a gallery talk, fully implemented, on this work, the explanations rang false (there were none) and even the lecturer's valiant attempts at getting somewhere with this went nowhere. The notes he uttered were false to me; no tonality, no harmony, no sense. Was this artpiece, of glass, in the imaginary 'shape' of Atlantis, then, or was it not? Even the questions from the floor, those in attendance, were stark, brief and vague  -  and everyone knew it. There was just nothing to grasp, yet a reputation and  -  in the lecturer's case  -  a scholarly career and articles and a book, had been made from it all. It was strange indeed, for me, to go to Fourcade's gallery  -  and have to read of or see photos only of these enormous Heizer works, while, around the corner, in the Metropolitan, the entire other, equally bizarre world, of ten centuries of 'framed' art, was hanging in rich, wild and blazing glory.


If I took anything from the rather rugged simplicity of Avenel, it was that pretension is the worst thing there is. I left there with the motto 'Simplify' ringing in my head  -  and it is still right. It works in the artworld too  -  stay old, remain outdated, work in outmoded fashion, remain small. All that is the language of Art, not grandiosity and pompousness and grand, enormous outreach. Most of Art today has turned into a public relations gimmick, tie-ins, big bucks and personality cults. It's like a visual rock-music for mostly moronic hangers-on. Now, as I see this, it just hit me that 'visual rock music' could be an art concept of its own any day  -  there's already a place in Pennsylvania where people go with hammers and strike the rocks  - which are strewn about everywhere in a huge-glacial-rock dump formation of about 40 acres  -  and each rock makes a different tone and sound. I had a friend, from Germany, a music-theorist and a music-major, who in fact produced and recorded some sort of 'suite' of this music from rocks (rock-music?) and, back in Berlin, had it performed, or at least played, publicly somewhere, to great reviews. He'd woven in a few other musicians, bass and oboes and the rest. In some strangely connected and tenuous way, the same string connects all these things. But the monumental art of the Earthworks people still strains. I don't know why. I'm from Avenel; I need the tidy frame.


It's always amazed me how I've probably missed the boat on everything that's interested me. Art, music, writing, poetry, and the rest  -  I've got tons of material but just have never caught onto the many-laced strings of going anywhere with it. I can't stand the dealings and the pretensions, the arrangements and the credentials and interviews kind of stuff. I refuse to make a public presentation which would be characterized as 'correct'. I'm handicapped. I should have special license plates. Avenel was certainly never meant to be a home for artists anyway  -  nothing good comes out of Nazareth, and all that. The art frenzy is not Art, it's just a frenzy. All I keep doing is working  -  when you're merchandising, you're not working, producing. I'd rather be doing that (the work itself). Merchandising is business, which blows. They've now even managed to make war and theft into business. So, far be it from me to interfere or even to get involved. I can't stand the 'type'. Let me be discreet. Next year in Jerusalem.


My Aunt Mae  -  spoken of before  -  living in Rutherford and all the rest, she had a neighbor there in which there was a 12-year old kid, named again Aldo, or some one of those foreign kind of names. This was about 1961, so I would have been perhaps 10 or 11 myself. The kid was a gifted classical guitarist  -  suave, Italian or Spanish kid, everyone always talking of his promise and good looks and great future. Little me, I hardly understood what 'classical' guitar was; the music of it, back at that time, never quite carried me  -  I was too distracted. Anyway, I never actually 'met' this kid formally; I'd just hear about him each visit, the girls would be swooning, mothers in adulation,  etc. Then, one day, I was told, just like that it was over. He'd had a brain tumor or a brain cancer or stroke or something, and had undergone serious procedures, etc., the end result of which was that he'd lost, in whatever manner, all the ability he once had for playing the guitar, or classical guitar or whatever, to his previous level of superb promise. In fact, he was now lucky to barely speak and feed himself. That was a shocker to me  -  everyone else seemed spellbound by the medical frenetics involved. I couldn't have cared a whit about that. What held me in place was the idea of an artistic 'gift' suddenly being taken away. If that was so, then how was anything stable and sure? How was anything to be believed? Had Aldo foreseen something and acted to end this himself? Had some eerie subconscious drive taken over him and stopped in its tracks whatever this budding of a creative talent was? Or, since it was, after all, music  -  and the music of others, to be truthful, that had been propelling him  -  was it merely a facile hand, a mechanical propensity of fast fingers, that had been his sustenance after all  -  the rote and the automatism that had him reading but the notes of others swiftly and efficiently, and playing them correctly? Is that creative talent? Or just talent, like someone good at a typewriter has? I was stopped in my tracks, left wondering and left speechless. What was it all anyway? My uncles and father and the rest, they all worked for a living, turning screws, nailing nails, and whatever else they did, machineries and tools, ad nauseum, each day. Was that drudgery the opposite of talent? Were they, without it, then incited to anything by the enforced routine and the pretty-much enslavement to their places and jobs and duties? Had this Aldo fellow had something dear and precious snatched from him? A life of ease and grace, playing music, doing only what he'd chosen, unenforced by punchclocks and responsibilities of a workman's nature? What was it anyway to which all these people were reacting to as if some nasty tragedy had overtaken Aldo? At one level, and one only, I thought I knew, but knew  -  at the same time  -  I'd never attain that level. Just something about it, inside me, didn't set right. I realized I'd probably rather dig a ditch if only those were the options  -  a 'routine' of talent, or a routine of drudgery. I somehow had to find a joy.


Everything seemed false, everything seemed fake. I remembered a Hitchcock movie, 'The Wrong Man', and I knew that, in and of itself, I had to take that movie apart, weirdly enough, just to begin to understand the foppery and falseness of what was going on about me  -  the stark moralizing, those dumb courtroom scenes, the close-up of a hand swearing-in on a bible, the fake respect for absolutely every pre-ordained and agreed-upon assumption; all of that was stupidly portrayed in this movie about mistakes, false identities, the look-alike re-evaluations. I was trying, even at age 10, to learn the world, to understand what was valued, and why.

63. When I was 11, I ran across the phrase 'halcyon days' and never quite knew what it meant. In fact, for the longest time as well I consistently got it incorrect, as 'halycon' days instead. It just seemed easier and more reasonable that way. I'd read it in something of a William Buckley article/reference in the old, early National Review, at the seminary library. It meant, to me anyway, a period of 'the best that things could be', or something of that nature. I never actually 'used' the word, thank goodness, not even knowing its correct spelling at first, let alone punctuation based on that. It was just one of those things, like so many others, that stayed with me  -  a simple occurrence, a phrase and a tumble of words that I couldn't shake. If anyone reading this is not aware, Bill Buckley  -  in the era of the Vietnam and Great Society, and beyond that, days  -  was a 'personality' of the supposed 'right' wing of the Republican Party, an editor, author of God and Man At Yale, in his twenties, about secularization and education, in its way, and eventually a particular character-type with a television interview show. Quite unique  -  prone to big words, convoluted sentences and usages, an interview behavior of affront and directness, with a completely expressive list of intense facial tics that were endearing. As he talked, commented and questioned his guests, all of this was on display. He was also old Connecticut money. His brother, James Buckley, was, as well  -  for a time a U.S. Senator from New York.

---------------------- 

['Halcyon days' Meaning Calm, peaceful days.   Origin:

halcyon daysThe Halcyon is a bird of Greek legend and the name is now commonly given to the European Kingfisher. The ancients believed that the bird made a floating nest in the Aegean Sea and had the power to calm the waves while brooding her eggs. Fourteen days of calm weather were to be expected when the Halcyon was nesting - around the winter solstice, usually 21st or 22nd of December. The Halcyon days are generally regarded as beginning on the 14th or 15th of December.                                                                                                                                               The source of the belief in the bird's power to calm the sea originated in a myth recorded by Ovid. The story goes that Aeolus, the ruler of the winds, had a daughter named Alcyone, who was married to Ceyx, the king of Thessaly. Ceyx was drowned at sea and Alcyone threw herself into the waves in a fit of grief. Instead of drowning, she was transformed into a bird and carried to her husband by the wind. The myth came to the English-speaking world in the 14th century, when, in 1398, John Trevisa translated Bartholomew de Glanville's De proprietatibus rerum into Middle English: "In the cliffe of a ponde of occean, Alcion, a see foule, in wynter maketh her neste and layeth egges in vii days and sittyth on brood ... seuen dayes." By the 16th century the phrase 'halcyon days' had lost its association with the nesting time of the bird and had taken on the figurative meaning of 'calm days'. Shakespeare used the expression that way in Henry VI, Part I, 1592: "Assign'd am I to be the English scourge. This night the siege assuredly I'll raise: Expect Saint Martin's summer, halcyon days, Since I have entered into these wars."   Note: Saint Martin's summer is what we now know as an Indian summer.    The kingfisher is associated with other powers relating to the weather. In mediaeval times it was thought that if the dried carcass of a kingfisher was hung up it would always point its beak in the direction of the wind [don't try this at home]. Shakespeare also refers to this belief, in King Lear, 1605: "Bring oil to fire, snow to their colder moods; Renege, affirm, and turn their halcyon beaks
With every gale and vary of their masters." Our current use of 'halcyon days' tends to be nostalgic and recalling of the seemingly endless sunny days of youth - despite the fact that the original halcyon days were in the depths of winter.]

---------------

At first, I just read his articles and things in National Review. In fact, an even funnier thing was, in 1971 and '72, when I'd moved out to the wilds of Pennsylvania, away from everything and 'out of contact' as it were, my father-in-law subscribed for me to that very magazine, which, incongruously, began being to delivered to my crazy house in the middle of nowhere, delivered, as you recall, by that postman who was the father of suicide-victim David Greenough. Think of all that  -  and how strange the overlap. I remember now, as well, other things that tie in with some of this  -  from my own viewpoint I've always been fairly missionary about my work and my application of 'Self' to what I wanted to be. There never used to be words for it, though now there are. I think 'outsider' used to best sum it up, and damn if now there aren't such things as 'Outsider Art' Shows in the trendiest parts of NYC once or twice a season. The most wealthy and potentially serious patrons and collectors howl about at these shows for the great, new, yet-unbroken outsider talent, the one who's  been scribbling and dabbing with paint for years to no avail on some self-taught mission to outer nowhere, and they've just discovered that person, on their way (not always his or her way) to making big money. Rats, you see, don't always abandon a sinking ship. (Sometimes they stay and just go down with it?)...I myself have always had my reasons for staying with things. Something like this: There is almost nothing worth saying that is not worth saying again.  The wide gamut of opinion and attitude doesn't have room to enter if one keeps the entries sealed by repeating the primary notion. Without development. Sense may be conveyed efficiently, in a single utterance of sufficient clarity; but meaning amasses and accrues, it is not stated but mined, and this requires a return to what was said, and then another return, and then another.  It requires repetition. Kierkegaard remarked, premonitorily, that 'one becomes weary only of what is new.' Epiphanies, our secular mysticism, are barren freaks of experience unless they are made to serve as beginnings, and raptures are succeeded by chores. And yet repetition is an ordeal for human expression, a trap, because what it gives it may take away. Out of revelations it makes regularities and routines. Distilling something down to the fewest words and the least reference, internal or without, doesn't quite work  -  I find myself, in the long middles of explanations, wondering  -  'have I said enough?' What gains by repetition also loses by it. Religious people know about the deadening effects of ritual and liturgy, about the tedium of the holy; they search for ways to refresh their practices and not merely duplicate them. In art, the problem of repetition is dauntingly common. It has been said of more than one great writer that he or she had only one story to tell, and meant as praise. In music, where the problem of repetition found its solution in the form of theme-and-variations (rather like the imprecise parallelisms of Biblical poetry) the attempt to eliminate repetition for the sake of a pure and perfectly concise statement led to the exquisite aridities of Webern, one of whose pieces is thirteen seconds long. Beautiful, but a stunt. A life without repetition is a life without development, a life of itches and inklings, a parade of first times, without commitments and institutions; in its crackling way, a dull and shallow life. We should learn to sustain our stimulations and make our redundancies into riches. Where there is urgency, it is not a sin to be raw or tiresome. It is a sin to desist. Conviction can make one a bore; and in this sense the world is changed by bores. If one believes that the village is burning, then one must proclaim over and over that the village is burning. One must also show that the village is in fact burning. In both those ways, and in all those ways, I drove myself endlessly hard  -  the fact that, at this late date, it has led nowhere is beyond the point. I'm still here, and I'm still doing  -  now, harder than ever. And  -  to repeat  -  the village is burning, the village is burning, the village really is burning.

It is sometimes difficult to realize the proposition that I am stuck; I may be stuck, completed, finished. Age and youth clarify each other only by conflict. In a convincing way, I have wrestled myself to stranglehold, bringing forth only the pain of stalemate and disappointment. Looking at it that way, an exit strategy prods its ugly head up, only to have to be pushed down again  -  another form of repetition. Follow me to this end; stay with me, along this run. I am lost in a mist  -  repeating the same things over and anew, to make what are essentially simple points  -  we are driven to succeed, only to get to nothing. Suicide is the perennial favorite, though I myself have always said 'I want to stay around to see how this thing ends up.' Simple matter, simple material. Most of the people I once knew have settled in or are settled in quite well  -  they made their peace long ago; posting old photos of Avenel places now derelict or gone, asking who remembers what, about this or that. That puts everything at one reach, at arm's length, allowing comfortable distance. And distance, for sure, is what it is. I've never been able to do that; to me it's always been within, inside my gut  -  memories, loss and passion for all that went before. I know myself, as I explained before, and I know what drives me on. Over and again, the same material? A friend of mine says 'get over it', what's passed is past. Maybe so, as he works just as hard to create a present and a future for myself, of ways and means that mean absolutely nothing to me.  Max Frisch or one of those German or Dutch writers, some time ago, wrote something called 'Biedermann and the Firebugs'. I understand that quite well. In this tale, a guy gets a down and out fellow into the attic and the guy burns the house down  -  well sort of, quick and faulty synopsis, but useful for me  -  and it always stood as, to me, a symbol of letting a dangerous element, unbeknownst to oneself, within and then having to pay for it. I made that deal a long time ago. Fighting fires ever since.

So, my few friends become tired of the repetition. I don't. When I took to the mountaintop, this serious, stupid mountaintop, I knew it would be like this. No one wants to hear bad news pelted at them. One of the quietest, most joyful moments I've had happened rather recently to me  -  some time back, visiting the gravesite of Mark Twain, amidst a great and wide morning quiet. It was pretty wonderful, and all it did was give me back the fire I needed, to repeat, to go over once more, to re-sound, endlessly, the message. The message resounds. Someday go read, for yourself, a little-known Twain non-classic  -  the carping, angry and seditious Twain book 'Letters From the Earth.' 


After both my parents had died, by 2004, I was pretty much settled. People have said, or at least I've heard that people say  -  as an adage, all the rest  -  that one doesn't really 'live', or take up one's own life, until both parents are dead  -  it's supposed to have something to do with facing the mortality of one's own self in the light of a crude kind of 'abandonment' and 'aloneness'  -  some crap about being left behind. It never worked for me, and I really do think it's all bullshit; the sort of small-talk one gets into at wakes and repasts, when there's really little else to do except pretend to utter the wise profundities which mark you as the living and 'the other' as  -  surely  -  dead. None of it's true anyway  -  there's no difference at all unless you make it be so. Anything can haunt you if you let it, if you advance there the situation by bringing in suggestion and presence  -  like a ghost story unsound but told over and over until the haunting comes true. Who cares?

 Also after my parents both were dead, I was given a box of photographs, distributed out by my sisters, selectively, a little here, a little there, to whomever was concerned or of whose times and places were in those photos. The ones I received, the ones I cared about anyway, of those that I received, jarred me and pushed my memory. In a strange way. All my life I'd been told about and 'thought' I remembered, or guessed I remembered, from the prodding suggestions, the first year's 'vacation' after we'd moved to Avenel. I've got no idea where this trip came from, or where the money was found or why so quickly after moving. But I thought I vaguely recollected it, and heard many of the stories over and over. I did definitely remember a vacation driving-trip, perhaps two years later, when I was 8 or 9, to Washington D.C. for a week, staying in little Virginia cabins, with my grandmother from Bayonne along (my mother's mother). That was filled with memory  -  I'll get to all that later  -  and I perfectly recalled much of it. But this one (I must have been between 5 and 6 years old) I really can't say I recall anything of. It was again a driving-trip vacation to a place called 'Thousand Acres Dude Ranch', somewhere in or along the Adirondacks (turns out it's actually, founded in 1942, still there, Stony Creek, NY, 13 miles west of Lake George. Somehow, until I looked it up, I'd always thought it was along the St. Lawrence Seaway, in some strange no-man's-land between Canada and the USA. Shows how even late-life illusion can be wrong). My father was never a mountain guy, and never liked fresh water, mountains, rivers, lakes or streams  -  he was usually ocean stuff all the way. I have no idea what brought him there. As I said, no recollection of any of this on my part; yet, there they were. I had been given maybe 15 or 20 photos of myself, in action up there. Each one had been inscribed on the back, in my mother's inimitable somewhat scrawly handwriting  -  'Gary with two Indian guides'; Gary doing archery'; Gary in canoe'; Gary at Wild West Show, in cowboy suit, with camp guides'; 'Gary playing baseball'; 'Gary panning for gold'; and more. And, to boot, in each photo, there I was, just me, (none of them (my parents) nor any of me with my then only sister, Donna). In each photo, I was in the midst of doing something with others  -  the camp had 'character -actor' types evidently running loose  -  wild men, cowboys, miners, hucksters, clowns, fake drunks, pathfinder guides, rugged frontiersmen, peaceful Indians, stage drivers, etc. I was at a campfire with these guys; I was on a wooded trail; I was pretend-shooting a rifle, at a stagecoach. It all baffled me, but it brought it all home. I'd never guessed it to be true, but the photos spoke volumes. 1956. There I was  -  king-prairie-dog-wild-man-camper. It amazed me to see all this  -  let alone the realized fact of my mother somehow actually having kept this stuff in the midst of all the other, regular family-type photos of kids, graduations, Christenings, church stuff, ball games, and the rest. There it all was, in black and white, all processed, dated, marked and saved. I had to sit up and think  -  how much of 'self' then is 'hidden' consciousness, things un-bared, repressed or kept at bay? When do memories begin? And why and how and how important is the role they play  -  subconscious drives, creative impulses, repressed conflicts or rages? What is there, at the limits, that is ever-apt to come bursting or shooting out? Do we know of this, somehow within ourselves, even while it's being denied? What do we do or not do about it, and how does it all mesh? Maniacs and functionaries together, walking through life  -  the one, daily, in any one of perfectly-kept cheap suits and ties for work, going about, dutifully, the tasks at hand (the functionary, obviously), and the other striking out, blind with fury, heaving and hurling oaths and terror. What comes from where, and when and at what time? Was I myself, then, not a thing of what I ever thought I was? Had I, as well, been to the moon, soared through the stars, dived the deepest oceans, walked through fire, murdered and maimed? Was I not just a bundle of recurring lives, running concurrently, all sourcing through me at once and banging raucously off of each other? Was all that, then my pain, my source of rootless abandon, my terror? That, my friends, is really what the loss of my parents brought me. I'd never lived until they died?



It all made me think about my art, my creative work, the source-pool from whence it all comes. What's in there, really, and what's feeding, constantly, the raging impulse which drives me madly on? I don't know. I do know that I have no control, I only do its bidding, take messages and cannot stop. Yes, but what is it, actually, that has taken me over, consumed my life, twisted all my judgments, brought mo to creeping standstills at every practical turn  -  pensions, money, medical insurance, health cares, possessions, travel and wealth itself, all non-existent in my own life. Was that present then? Did I take some sort of youthful notes about all this and conveniently hide them away in some back-lit antechamber of my being so I could 'pretend' to undergo the rest of my growing up in season. I wondered, how did I ever get the knife out of my own back? Or is it always still there, an indelible wound, unable to be repressed or hidden. Am I not, myself, some weirded out, worse Dee Snider version of my own aching, pathetic Twisted Sister moment, forever gouging my own eyes out again each time there's a mere glimmer of light? Are all these things photographed and kept? Signed, marked, inked and sorted : 'Gary, gone crazy again': 'Gary, at the precipice': 'Gary, screaming out loud.'


64. You'll notice that I did use the words 'parents were dead'. I have no reason not to. I notice how the varied euphemistic ways of addressing that fact have crept into our language  -  they've 'passed' or they've 'crossed over', or any of that faded use of  'word-as-vague-suggestion-touch-me-not' stuff. I don't know what people are so afraid of  -  offending others, treading on uncomfortable ground or whatever  -  but it's endemic now. The word here is 'dead'. Got that? Life is basically, no matter how you look at it, a reaction to language. Noam Chomsky and all the others who preach or have preached their 'inborn language' premises, they may not be so far off  -  in some ways consciousness revolves around language, which is first and always is out there  -  we come from it, the ball of cosmic dust/dream which becomes us is in fact, like a golf ball used to be (is no longer), a hard-wrapped and seemingly endless string of rubber bands woven around a tiny, hard and very bouncy plastic core  -  much of that core is language and interpretive potential. We are born with that already instilled  -  for without it there would be no world. Wittgenstein makes this point so well, over and over, in his works  -  he has two distinct sides of his work, by the way, before or current with the 'tractates' and then after the break and after the 'tractates', when he sort of simply rebuked, re-apprised, and re-worked most of his material.  By the way, let me interject here that an investigation into the Wittgenstein family is pretty wondrous  - so much suicide, his brother with one hand or arm who was, at the same time, a grand concert pianist, Ludwig himself as the schoolteacher who stopped, the philosophy writer, doctrinaire proposer of ideas, who stopped that as well and meticulously built instead, for his sister, a hand-built and designed house. And then, after it all, he went back to his writing, re-doing entire premises. The colored-notebooks, the lectures, the Tractates. You'd need a second life just to get into and stay with this well. It's fascinating. So anyway, 'dead' is dead  -  as a wrote it carries along its own entire raft of references and meanings. But, in fact, as with every other word, at down-base-bottom, it simply doesn't exist. The statutory premise it attempts to describe, or bring forth, that itself MAY exist, but only for the connective and interpretive moment we give it. For instance, I give the entire idea for this reluctance to use the word 'dead' in any of its derivations to probably the blunt happy-talk stupidity of TV evangelists, if to nothing else. The whole premise of that approach to false-religion is a basic form of economic optimism preached by charlatans  -  whether wagon-train hucksters traveling from Ohio to the Dakotas way back or today's dick-faced hucksters blandishing their 8-inches from TV screens. None of it is religion in any real sense, but it's the camouflaged and wrenching manner by which things are done today  -  this mis-use of language-as-patter being but one example.

During the later 1960's and early 1970's  -  and pretty much for the rest of her life too, until a late-life form of sentimental dotage and memory, as is usual, took over, (I hadn't really seen her for years) I had an aunt (my mother's oldest sister, Anna) who somehow 'prided' herself on a special, intellectual relationship (all supposed by her) with 'Gary', or  -  as she put it  -  'my Gary'.  To her it all meant that we alone shared some form of intellectual capital that we could talk about  -  books and philosophy mostly. I never quite got it, but went along. Her fixation was on, as she again put it, 'my Bertrand Russell.' It was 'Bertrand Russell' this and 'Bertrand Russell' that, at all times. It never went anywhere and I never exactly knew what she was into or what she meant by such engagement  -  if the acknowledgement of 'Bertrand Russell' meant something specific in her world view  -  some philosophic underpinning, some magical adjunct, something transformative to her character. It certainly never seemed so  -  in the end she was still all about the usual junk : bedspreads and sheets, the telephone, food and meals, who said what to whom, who was visiting or never visited, the manner and means of how someone else lived, all the gossipy stuff of middle-aged ordinary women. Money. Connections. Place. She married her third husband, a pretty cool and dapper middle-aged Bayonne gent from the Bayonne old-times, Joe Pastuzyn. He was evidently some sort of a catch for her -  he had very successful and prospering dry cleaning business right in the middle of town, Broadway and 33rd, called McCarthy Cleaners  -  an old business name, from when he bought it. In addition, he by then owned the building it was in and one or two adjacent apartment building units, 3 or 4 stories each. Nice income, good liquidity, interesting, quiet guy. Out front of the building  -  this was, after all, 'old Bayonne', still existent in the late '70's  -  there were, just across the street and down a few storefronts, two old gas pumps, at curbside. Not a roadside service station, please make that notice, but an actual, along the way, at-curb, set-up of two glass-bowl gas pumps for early automobilers  -  right up from the beginning of the era, throughout the 1930's and 50's, unto the then-present days of 1977.  Broadway was once the teemed thoroughfare of its name; even in old Bayonne. The way the very simple streets and storefronts were laid out was incredibly blunt and basic  -  Bayonne had no charm nor old-world vigor or gentility. It was commerce, straight and in a row  -  cheap stores, live-butchers, fresh meats and vegetables, food to go, sit-down eateries and dry goods shops. Liquor stores, political clubs, bicycles, toys, baby clothes  -  all the same stuff as 2nd Ave or Ave A along the lower eastside of NYC.  Bayonne was all that but without the New York City stuff  -  it was a parochial, ethnic, zone-warding, enclaves of Poles, Italians, Slavs and Germans. And the rest; more severe in the manner of its separation. I used to like to tie Bayonne in with the New Orleans street imagined in Streetcar Named Desire  -  which play and the movies made from it I studied pretty carefully for a while. It was fun to make that tie-in; rather goofy, but fun as well, something like the little bar-crowd scene (playboy house-party scene) in Hitchcock's 'Rear Window' managing to noisily mangle the song entitled 'Mona Lisa, Mona Lisa.' Same sort of loose, Bayonne, cheap and tawdry feel. In the play, all Blanche has, as she arrives in New Orleans, is her sister's address on a piece of paper  -   setting up the atmosphere, she is lost, literally, and has to ask for directions. She is told (the answer sounds allegorical, or even satirical) - 'You take the streetcar called Desire, then Cemetery, then you end up in Elysian Fields.' An itinerary from life to death to glory.

Bayonne was kind of a loose, greasy place of absolutely no glory  -  a sidebar to all else. Not NYC, not even Jersey City, another grimy Mecca of sloth, which abutted it and somehow bled over into it as a bigger-brother, even dirtier and seamier, of it. Both it their own dioramas of truth and vice  -  sex and theater, dark motivations and crime and mayhem. They just read them, each, differently. One was a major city, of sorts, while the other (Bayonne) was a mere zipper, something to pull back in order to reach the more real Sodom next door. I use it here as my own New Orleans, because that's all I had to reckon by  -  we each get the universe we're given with the stars already placed in it, and the mind  -  acting as sextant and compass  -  uses what it may, whichever stars there are,  to do its own dead reckoning along the horrid traveler's journey we're tasked with. Some find the Indies and riches; others wash up on weird and wicked shores, still almost thinking they're right and that they really have found their glory-hole, their own island of gold.

One time we visited the home of one of my aunt's friends  -  a police lieutenant named Jablonsky. Jack and Marge, as I remember it. I don't know where the money came from or what the local 'connections; may have been  -  the place was sumptuous, out of the ordinary, and well past the mark of ordinary status  -  a large, old-style Bayonne house, set high, way back from the street, at a diagonal to the corner it sat upon. A really nice house, high and furnished like that. Evidently my aunt had some sort of friendship here which went back a long way  -  they were seemingly expensive people. Marge was a glitzy charmer; Jack seemed to be a tough hombre, a bouncer, with a badge. I guess to live within all that, and attain rank, one had to be  -  always on the lookout, at the top of whatever heap was in place, and sturdy and rugged to stay there. I remember little else about it  -  my father, as I recall, was not that pleased  -  the usual rancor and stiff jealousy; my mother gushed. Bayonne had many levels of things  -  as another of my aunts put it, my Aunt Mary, the pious one who had sewn my nametags into all that clothing for the seminary  -  'Bayonne never let the 'element' in.' She meant blacks, Negroes. Which was strange, coming from her  -  relief housing, two small kids, widowed, Italian  -  as it all could have been construed by anyone else as an 'element' all its own. We were all 'elements' somehow. I don't know how far back Bayonne went  -  a little peninsular spit of land on the water in the ass-end of NY harbor  -  filled with industry, service depots, a huge Navy Yard, water traffic, tugs, barges, ferries. It had, three hundred years before, been considered a royal pavilion where the NY rich played. My particular project-apartment homes were built on the site of the old La Tourette Mansion, a sort of rich-people's bed and breakfast in the 1800's  -  a ferry ride off from lower Manhattan, beach and water, amusements and banquets, sailing and swimming. The whole coastline right there was famed; one mansion and resort after the other, a mere twenty minute boat ride away, if that. Of course, industry took care of all that  -  by the 1900's it was all gone and by 1920 it had all been supplanted by work and travail. Any trace of the old glory was gone  -  wave after wave of tough worker breeds came in  -  Poles, Irish, Italians, Puerto Ricans, piled atop each other, they each had their enclave. The housing stock was dim  -  no one could ever decide to go urban brownstone style or squat, roomy estate housing. One after the other the numbered streets were laid out, filled in, and the once-quaint named-not-numbered streets of trees and charm lost all that. Until about 1980 one could still find places like unpaved Willow Street and others, at the higher end of town  -  away from the water actually  -  streets named for trees and other geographic and natural things. Paving came late. Those gas pumps I mentioned, they didn't disappear until about 1982. The vendors of goods and food and such fronted the streets  -  simple storefronts, sloppy carts. People everywhere. Yet, never a city, really, just always trying. It was run, politically, by wave and faction after wave and faction of ethnics. For a while the Poles had the in, then the Irish, then the Jews, then Italians. It just kept rolling over. Whatever lawlessness there was had its own ways of justice. Things got taken care off. On either side there was water  -  waterfronts, the running and flushing of bays and streams, places to stash things and hide. Shacks and sheds everywhere. There was a time when things were like that  -  everyplace. Newark and Elizabeth, all up along Hudson County's higher reaches, Essex and Bergen  -  strange, rocky places, distant yet close. Part of a New jersey charm long ago finished up. Bayonne held it as long as it could  -  like a card-players' party that just went on a little too long.

I watched all of this with one eye. At whatever age I was, a lot of this was just rushing in at me, streaming past my eyes as a bright light from a sunlit window, throwing light and angles, shade and blockage all over a room I could otherwise pretty plainly see. I was young, a little kid, but there was something already inherent in me that was old  -  I'd known all this stuff before, had traveled these sensations and already knew the distinctions. What I was doing now was another go-round, a recurrent trip through a Babel of occurrence I had to walk myself through  -  all the while learning to talk the communication of those I was with. It's been said the psyche, the Life within us, is endless, moves along, continues. It's been said that we 'select' the family and situation into which we enter. It's been pointed out that 'memories' are just the accumulations of other lives, all at once, running concurrently, and that Civil War experts are that because they are living Civil War meanderings at another level, that Renaissance science buffs are that because they are there  -  we tap the stream and we write the open language into which we are thrown, backwards and forwards, all the same, everything at once. That's the secret of time and the essence of particularity, the 'singularity' of physics comes from this as well. Nothing can be pinned down, once you focus upon it it flees, breaks apart, rushes into other sections -   feigning movement (which is our interpretation of a phenomenon we agree we see), pretending to another magic. We can only see one portion of it at a time  -  something like a television that presents one channel to you but at the same time has another 110 channels underway, just another level of the frequency, the un-tuned wavelength you're not onto. I think my Aunt Anna missed a lot of this with her stalled, incomplete trek into 'Bertrand Russell' whatever that represented to her and if it really was 'Bertrand Russell' at all  -  or if she just thought it was (her comfort zone, her own creation of a constructed symbolic reality of a 'Bertrand Russell' she felt OK with, a sort of 'Bertrand Russell with a couch' thing). Obviously, she never moved from it. Real knowledge, and real discovery through education, is discursive  -  it all leads elsewhere. You begin with one thing and that leads you to another and then somewhere else. You never know where you really are to end up, and staying in one place (as my aunt did) is really impossible if you are, in fact, learning. Much like the Internet of today  -  all those discursive and sidebar things, all those clicks and then clicks, they all bring you to other things to follow-up on, to see and read or learn. Weirdly, oddly human in the way it moves your brain along, it's an intense symbol of something akin to what I'm talking of. So, anyway, I rather never understood nor believed my aunt and her broad, fantastic psychological searches  -  EST, Transactional Analysis, and the fringe movements that all went with it. I just never saw enough evidence to make it believable to me. Anyway, she was more about drama than anything else; a real dispossessed queen.


I wouldn't, or couldn't know about all of that. I can only use the evidences given to me  -  My Aunt Anna, and all her strange Logistic and Positivistic Bertrand Russell input  -  whatever it meant to her  -  never got through to me. She had another side I didn't really like  -  something harsher and snide, jealous and nasty, snarling and sneering, of the sort whom you knew would be talking about you, critically, as soon as you left the room, and from the entire other side of the viewpoint she'd just presented. It was all too adult for me  -  she began to represent the idea of accumulation and want, not accident and need; which were the forms I liked my life with :  you get what you get, you take what you find. What you don't have, you don't need, and it all works up; now shut up.  It was nothing I had real feelings about either way, just knowing instead that I wanted none of it  -  ordinary, like worrying about couches and bookcases, cars and restaurants. A person goes all through hoops and runs rings and the rest seeking to find and declare some sort of exceptionalism  -  whether it's Bertrand Russell worship, or the entire Positivist School of philosophy, or whatever  -  and then one day you get discovered behind a pillar devilishly reading a gothic-romance novel. It's all just too ordinary. And the other thing I always felt, leastways for myself, was that when you're reading something, learning something  -  as she always claimed to be doing from Bertrand Russell  -  it never just stops 'there'. It leads to other things  -  discursive stuff, diversions, deeper follow-ups, investigations into other connections. It never did for her. She just kind of chomped down on Russell and, at whatever level, never left. I never knew; and actually of all the philosophical study-stuff I did, Bertrand Russell always came across to me as one of the least, or the least, interesting ones. She never explained anything better than that  -  and when I got started, I eventually just ended up deep-ass into Wittgenstein anyway  -  that's where the interesting person was. It has to be totally alienating, almost in an unworldly way, to be caught up in study. You can't just go halfway; it's not about money, or gain or possession or talent or privilege. A real, scratch-off-the-surface inquiry into any of this stuff just does eventually break the world down to nothing, taking it all apart  -  one is left with pieces and oddments to reconstruct. Certainly not cars and couches, routines and television shows and movies. That's frank horse-shit and no matter what abstemious explainer tries to deepen this and explain it better for you, there's no value there. I don't care what your televised special or movie-threshold cinema crap is, it's a ten-mile, back-there, mule stop, where only sluggards and burros end up.
Anyway, that was that. Philosophy in the hallway of an apartment building isn't much fun anyway.  Eventually they split their allegiance and ended up in Brick, NJ anyway  -  a place made of sand and developers, once a long-ago sand oasis but by the 1980's reduced too to a steely row of shopping strips, cute homes, busy and bustling people and second-homers, looking all for something to do. the opposite end of the spectrum from Bayonne, but  -  funny enough  -  so very many of those Bayonne people ended up right there as well  -  transplanted as 'senior citizens' into their second homes turned into real homes. The last time I saw her, she was a'bed, sick and ailing, in a small room at the top of the stairway in their brick, NJ home  -  yes, still talking of Bertrand Russell and surrounded lightly by one or two bookcases with an assortment of showy books, and some not so. she died a while back; her tailor-husband Joe is still alive. A funny story about Joe -   a tale I worked out of him the last time I saw him, at someone's birthday gathering or something, sitting around a table, drinking wine, in a noisy and crowded reception hall somewhere : all my life I was always impressed by his pipe-smoking; steady and studied, serious and right.  He always took great pains with his pipes, and pretty much nearly always had one going. Always appeared wise and dignified. Never seemed to harm him none. I asked why he'd stopped, figuring old age had beat it out of him.  He smiled, and said 'Jesus Christ, Gary, you know why I smoked them? You want the story behind that? I never really 'wanted' to smoke, but I did. For years in the dry-cleaner shop I had a customer, steady, always returned. He never could quite pay his bill, but he owned a tobacco shop. He one day just began paying me in pipes and tobacco. I said OK, and it never really stopped; so what else could I do? I smoked them.' Funny story, but true.

I'm sure Bayonne had its own million true stories, like anywhere else  -  behind each store-front and apartment window there'd be something to find, if one only looked.
I want to get back for a moment to Stella Adler. I've studied her a lot, read many of her commentaries on plays and things  -  tips on acting, strategies and concerns about character, etc.  I enjoy it. From it I learn. One particular lecture of hers I cherish and regard highly  -  and this is but one of many (Ransom Center Archives, Univ. of Texas, edited and assembled by Barry Paris with, until she died, Stella Adler herself) is on the play 'A Streetcar Named Desire' - Tennessee Williams, 1947. It's filled with many of her particular insights and, as much as it is New Orleans, always reminds of Bayonne, and returns me there. 'You have to have a good idea of this kind of life. People are drinking and gambling and fighting and fornicating. The movement, the anger, the tone, are all violent. When a person reaches what he wants in this city, it is all insanity. It is a caricature of how people live. The needs of the people who live are the needs of insane people. It is appetite without end. Even animals rest, but people don't rest here. Nothing rests here; it is always going. There is craziness in their way of talking, acting, reacting. The rhythm is violent. Blanch comes from someplace else; she goes for the poem in life. But in this place, compulsiveness is the regular way of life. An orgy of emotions, without control, everything seems to hinge on sex and violence. Emotions out of control lead to Hell. Nobody is inhibited here. Poker and bowling and screaming and screwing and hitting each other  -  that is their way. They are unashamed and contented with this life. They are driven by debased circumstances  -  the lack of money, the lack of education, the lack of mercy all around them.  But those circumstances create a terrific vitality.'

I never really understood how I made the connection to New Orleans, through streetcar and through Stella Adler, with Bayonne  -  but it always, in so many ways, worked. Remember, I didn't actually 'grow' there, although I lived there for four and a half years-- from young zero to an impressionable four and a half, and I feel I retained a lot, but most of it was 'thematic' retention, something theatrical, accented and bold, meant to be spoken or re-visited by some weird sort of mental film only. That's an essential difference, and one to remember. Never really 'there' there, just rather there. So, in this odd, darkened, nether world, I created this place  -  feuding, fighting, dark rooms, strange social situations  -  and went from there. In my own family, as previously mentioned, there was always seemingly an undercurrent of violence, just out of sight. Most of it took place in Bayonne : my father and my uncle (he'd married my mother's sister Millie), speaking of simmering anger, went at it one night after the wake at my grandmother's funeral  -  my father trashed the place, left a punch-hole in one of the walls, and he and my uncle fought their family version of fisticuffs. Another time my father, enraged over something, stormed out of my grandmother's house and attacked a guy in a neighboring playground over some slight or another. There was always the simmering of attitude and tension. In much the same way as the tensions so well presented in streetcar. Stella Adler here continues (all of this could be Bayonne, 1954) : 'Blanche has the mood of a life which has come down through the ages. She is weather-beaten. Having weathered the storms of life that are found through the entire history of woman, she has survived and she has emerged from it with a weakened body and a weakened psyche. She symbolizes the woman who is not so much sick physically as sick inside. She cannot take being alone, without being taken care of. Aloneness is not a way to live in the world. It creates sickness. Stella, by comparison, is rather indefinite...Blanche is the point where she would need great tenderness to survive. Her pain might be alleviated by kindness and understanding  -  not by the primitive brutality of men like Stanley. That craziness in the way they act, the way they drink, the way they play cards, makes them wild. A case of beer brings out the savagery. Tennessee feels the common people are full of depravity and that even their normal sexual behavior takes on a brutish, degenerate air. Blanche arrives and must suddenly become the fighting force against this mob? It is too much for her. It is asking too much to bring these two classes together. From Strindberg on, the mixture of two classes  inevitably leads to disaster. She is hysterical, weakened, half gone... The masses from Ibsen on are in deep, aggressive ignorance and anarchy, with no desire to get out...the overall vulgarity of the masses, represented by this man Kowalski...Tennessee is giving you the two big forces in America and the impossibility of their coexisting peacefully. Stanley represents the seductive male force, born of primitive instincts. Blanche represents the aristocracy of the mind, clinging to her strength in judgment. She at no point gives that up. Stella is caught in between Stanley's battle for life and Blanche's need to understand it; it is not an even match. Realism in the theater means the search for what is absolutely true in every situation.  It means giving up the romantic or idealistic way of portraying things, no matter how romantic or idealistic certain characters might be. In Emile Zola's book 'Germinal' about the working class, Zola said 'I have to show people what life actually is, not what they'd like it to be.' He shows you the red goo dripping out of a package  -  what's coming from there? Oh, that's meat with the blood running out of it. That is naturalism. It is for you to see life as you'd see it in the emergency room at a hospital, with someone's mouth smashed open, gushing blood.'

65. There's a far station somewhere, with trains always arriving and leaving. I was glad for that, and  -  in my symbolic way  -  I was just as glad I lived on the railroad tracks. In Avenel, as a kid, I used to scramble out the window of my little upstairs room and sit on the lower roof, the portion of which was extended out behind me. From it, I could see the remnants of the old prison farm and, later, the State School (described previously) - all those mad, bizarre adjuncts of supposed 'imperfect' humans, tucked away for no one to see. The name 'State School' used to give me shudders. Who did they think they were? 'State' taking people in and shuttering them up   - it was like some mad Russian novel from two-hundred years back  -  asylums and exiles. Apparently, it was OK. No one ever said a word, nor seemed even to think about it. In our elementary school, right down the street, I'd be exposed to children's grammars and reading books wherein there was always a mother and a nicely illustrated kitchen  -  school-book illustrations  -  with a window or a door which always showed a scene of some pastoral or farmyard setting, a rail fence, a meadow, old barn, a few cows, a  big tree  -  while the mother and kids went about their tasks. Day by day, all around me, in my life, that was disappearing, and no one cared. It always seemed a quiet conflict to me, how trees and woods and forests and meadows and streams could all be disappearing, farmland down the drain, no one saying a word, while all this older idea of 'place' was somehow still being peddled and taught. It was devious. I pictured the evil men in suits, ledger books and clipboards at hand, figuring their profit margins and quotas, as they bought, sold or stole the lands and places to be destroyed (for, oddly, people like me to end up in). It was all profit and money, greed at the churn-wheel, spinning. Yet, the schoolbooks and the sentimental foppery taught, seemed never to catch up. Why was that, I wondered? Which world was I supposed to be in? What was wrong with these people? It was something strange, parts of which I only found  out about later anyway. What does a child know? Whatever it finds out or stumbles upon, whatever dawns on the brain, still has to fit  -  at that point  -  the parameters of childhood, which are mainly soft and frivolous and sentimental. There's way too much ahead, at that point, to really make determinations about the now. Society's ideals permeate people who strive in the outside world  -  to survive and get ahead. But it never really works. They just get wrecked and ruined. It's an old story. Money people swoop in, take things over, and just - continually - think that way. I knew I wanted none of it; I swore to be an artist, to create, even early on, though it fit, at that point, nothing. I didn't even know where to begin or what path to take  -  the world always treated artists badly, or so it seemed. Those frightful ogres,' industrialists', managers, financiers, bankers, always looking for return and money, the lucre-gang, affects the artist badly; makes him drink, stumble, think he is a failure. Anyway, that was then, and that's how I felt. Maybe it's different, a bit, now. Maybe not. I don't readily care anyway, nor give a fig to what suits the moment.

Society's ideals, all those false 'to do it right' things, they permeate people who strive to get ahead, to prosper in the outside world. 'Social' writers write about this, engaging in some way the very society they are amidst; doing their work, as it were, for the benefit of others  -  though no one listens. Society never says 'You're a failure' to rich people. That's why writers, artists, playwrights become political. In the Depression, people were so destroyed, desperation was so widespread, that people began being able to understand a politics behind it. They saw that while we were going to war, we were selling Japan scrap iron to make the arms they'd use to fight the boys we were sending there. It was the unions on the west coast, even as they realized it meant work for them, who said 'No, we will not ship it!' The working class finally took control over the situation.  Creative people, then at least, were always fighting that kind of lack of ethics in government, in industry and the arts. No longer; now it's all been co-opted and everything's been sold down the river and is judged by money, by 'how much'. Even back then, I had a glimmer of all this in my head, growing slowly as I was, to the realization of being, basically, lost amidst a splendor of nothing. My father, or my mother for that matter, never let a smattering of concern through  -  they were pretty mindless of anything societal going on. My mother was always just naive; my father was just (usually) harsh and adamant. Once or twice I detected a twinge of some form of romanticism coming through him, but it never stuck and was always shocking. Perhaps the Brooklyn Bridge, Roebling and Mauthausen, in Germany. That was pure fact. But the real romance of Roebling, and the bridge, Saxony and then engineering and river locks and metals in the old iron and steel industries of Pennsylvania, the romance of Brooklyn Heights and the construction processes of the bridge and the city itself, that never entered. The small wire-rope town of Roebling, down by Trenton, NJ, and the Roebling factories there and in the Trenton, the use of the waterways, etc.  -  any of this was open to investigation and even visiting, but it never came. That would have been the real romance for me; I do that sort of thing all the time, now. My father never showed any aspirations for that sort of basic discovery stuff. It went, for both of my parents, the way it goes for most people : nothing's 'special' unless someone first tells you it is, makes an event of it, a Colonial Williamsburg of sorts, some selected place which merely becomes an apparatus to play act and pretend.  It's totally lame.

All of that has to be separated out  -  art and creativity, and the romanticism of all this way of seeing  - must be kindled and cared for. Society, by contrast, is due for its appointment in Hell  -  the politics and the militarism of Capitalism that says 'We'll make lots of money selling armaments and the rest to anybody who wants them, but no money for artists or poor people.' I used to think the more people suffer, the more they will revolt. I never saw any of that  -  nowhere did I ever really see unhappy people in destitute states. Even if poor, they all seemed wise to it and satisfied enough. Part of those things I could never add up together; it sort of never made sense and I concluded that the system had found ways of trickling just enough to people to keep them duped perhaps, but happy. In actuality, the place I lived  -  all of that Avenel and Inman Avenue and suburban stuff  -  was all about that. The happiness quotient and the duping quotient all at the same time  -  the old men, not really old but young fathers and veterans, still talked of the war, of their de-mobilization, of what they did, where they once were. Everything was still close enough to be real  -  things were still hard, metal, steel, wood. Not yet an age of plastic and imitation. That was soon to come. I can remember when my mother and father used some of these odd new products which were supposed to be 'making' the modern world 'better' : wall coverings called' Sanitest' and 'Congoleum' plastic based stuff, shiny and glossy, easy for wiping down and cleaning and covering bad or bare old walls with something new and shiny; my mother's use of something called 'Similac'  -   a baby formula of sorts, instead of breast-milk. ('Simulating lactation,' I guess).  Karo Syrup in water,  to sate the baby sucking on a bottle filled with this watered down syrupy sweet, instead of real, milk; sugar-water to keep the baby quiet; Tang; an astronaut's imitation orange juice. There were many other things of this nature. It was a peculiar way of life, and  -  as witness to it, and partaker of it  -  I did come away at the least with my own unique spin on it.

I think we live anew in an age of barbarism. The barbarians have taken over. Culture and learning are shot, belittled, and cast-off. We've given over society to ne'er-do-wells, stringers and losers of no value. The import of 'Life' now is in bringing into our midst a yet lower rung of the dumb and the stupid and the destitute, and catering to them. Hordes of myopic little landscapers, destroying what they touch, and breeding profusely. Pretty much, it's over. We've let it go. In my small life, the people around me were all 'mass' men, without knowing it, without realizing what they were. They did all things in tandem  -  lived lowly and miserably, in tandem. Rooted, cheered, pretended at understanding, functioned and though as one. It's still like that, yes, and in some ways worse, down even a few more rungs. In certain ways, let me think, they were all like men on a picket line  -  but blind and unknowing of why. It was the family, it was the class. Everything about them. These sorts just go on, they rue the day, and yet they go through the day. Among these people there's little 'un-natural' death, or suicide; they just, instead, all run out the clock and die that way, later on  -  after being dead for so long anyway. There's nothing really individual about them. There is no sense of personal catastrophe, within the group, and  -  as well  -  no sense of personal privacy. It's as if these folk never had any place where they were just one person alone  - it was certainly true in the back-rooms and bedrooms of Inman Avenue and Avenel, and even more viciously so and excitedly darker, in Bayonne. It was adventure, through a dark, smoked glass -  something one could see but not so clearly delineate. The quest was in starting out  -  getting some industrial job, not learning or knowledge, just a job, wages, maybe then a 'fine' union job with scheduled wage increases, structure job categories, benefits and pension  -  then all that came later came as reward for the darkness. The thing you get from such situations, the picture, is family interiors and picnics, or things like that anyway. No real 'place' for two people, or even one, to be together. Every 'personal' moment has to be a stolen moment. Why? I never knew. I sometimes think that the silly drive that brought me early to the church and all that seminary stuff was that very search, of finding of, the personal moment and the dark, silent space that such an idea of paltry 'religion' afforded, or offered, or appeared to. Now it's all different  -  I live silently and I live alone, as with one arm, tied and tethered, within myself. I broke away from all that  when I realized it was all a sham  - family, religion, business, profit-motives, duties, regulations, the details of psychic exorcism everywhere. Garbage. Instead of covering and getting over all that, I realized I had to go into it, find it, delve, mine it, get from it and produce. Fuck it all, I'm my own CEO in a 'business' far bigger and greater than any I've ever found before. My product is gold. Nothing about the 'men' of my youth, these 'big' men  -  fathers, the cops, the Crilleys and Jablonskys of the past, was human. As a class, they were all wounded, clubbed. Scarred men, and scarred men's women too.  Senses of wounded, beaten-up, mutilated folk. It was all just like that. That's the reason for suburbia  -  that's the reason center-cities were destroyed, abandoned torn down, left to crumble, given over to the new rabble and indigent, the newer slobs who took it over. Regular 'Man' fled  -  tore down rail stations and roundabouts, plowed over central squares and town centers and gazebos and platforms and vegetable marts and terminals. Destroyed every fabric of urban living and wealth. Why? In a search for sameness, and in a flight from reality. In a feared, nervous assault against themselves and all they should have stood for. Much like my own father  -  never investigating, never seeking out, never learning of or from things  -  they all just went to the seashore, went fishing, played dead (not that they even had to). They let the moguls take them over  -  peddling drivel, entertaining the slobs, publishing cant and rubbish, filling their heads with crap, using them, lying to them and stealing from them. Hollywood? Bullshit. Glamour? Bullshit. Industries of entertainment, style and fashion? Bullshit. Sports? Bullshit. All of these were high-wire trapeze stunts for 'Others' to make their money and careers lording over the rest. We've been run by bastards and creeps for so long we no longer know it, certainly didn't then. I was a child, and I forced myself, quickly and hard, to stay at least one step off, away from it all, and I swore it would never touch me. These people has a mass energy, perhaps; pathetic but there. Any mass has that  -  but as individuals they were wounded or dead already. They possessed instead a feebleness, a supposed mass uprightness but they were broken, destined all for personal violence and for getting themselves messed up. The individual, to them, was not a force  -  only the mass was a force. Crowds and features, mobs and noisy rule. They tried underscoring all that, first maybe with Korea but most certainly later with Vietnam. Ruining more and killing by their committed satisfactions to fantasy and falsehood, false politics covering over the stink of Death and misery. The dangers of success are as great as those of non-success. Only an idiot takes success personally. Learn first from a master, whatever it is you study, whether painting or architecture or music, and  -  if done right  -  originality will come of itself. You can't try to fake originality.  That's the 'mortal' sin the Catholic Church long ago missed. Thy faked everything in order to make their own incredible and incredibly stupid bureaucracy, and they  let other religions behind them all do the same, and based it all on fakery and disguised secularism. Now they're as dead and lost as any 'Dad' I ever knew. Thornton Wilder said 'I consider it best to write about things that lie on the boundaries of the unknown.' Interesting.

He also said 'For God's sake, live your life! Live it with as much joy as you can muster because it won't come around twice. There will be sorrow  -  but pass on the joy!'  That's why he puts in, in his plays, the milk and beans and cows and the horses. He says life is made up of small things, all the things people take for granted. If you remember my note about the Barron Arts Center, when we stage-read 'Our Town, parts of it anyway, all that simplicity and local joy were really, at base, what we were after, what we sought to put across. Worrying about how to properly stage-pronounce the word 'erudite' was only a most-insignificant part of it. (Wilder didn't like living in America much. He lived minimally here. He said America was dominated by an elite that posed a danger. As much as he loved the American way of life, he said Americans don't really know who they are). Wilder's idea is that man has to have a mind. He must develop his mind. He has to love in every way he can, but just as much he has to lust   -  making a world psychologically, and then being responsible. Use the feelings, the heart and the mind. That's the part of Mankind that's determined by the psychological dimension and  -  because of it, Man makes mistakes (see 'Bayonne'; see 'Avenel'). He makes mistakes because, inside, he's very confused.

I always thought it was funny how people adopted everything they heard from the so-called 'experts'. They took everything at face value, and if it was said by someone portrayed as an 'authority' then all the more was it true and perfect. Unfortunately, it was all mostly deluded. Once you got to the core, tore away all the rippled onion skins around it  -  words and meanings and concepts  -  it was 'nothing' at all. The 'experts' hadn't a clue, and there wasn't any 'authority'. It was all just words and empty, assumed concept-matter. One was forced  -  in order to stay with and finish the concept  -  to go along with all the words and ideas. That's what I saw, and you now must try and consider what it meant to a ten-year-old or whatever, to realize these ideas. It meant that the world was nothing and that the unspoken truth of matter was that the goofy words and ideas of adults had to be humored, at the least. One had to go along, to get along. Just like that stupid comment from Congress I used way back in the beginning of these chapters somewhere. The entire thing was about assumptions; people went to years and years of school and expense and toil so as to reach the area of some prime, perfect adjustment to assumptions. That's what Success was, and that's what money repaid. That fidelity to assumptions. (But they didn't always work : remember, the ancients kept most of their ancient secrets in caves). As a child, this stuff was most basically and most simply found  -  blatantly symbolic as it was  -  in the way even science fiction movies ended up being, at heart and by the end, romantic shoot-em-ups with old-fashioned girls and guns. You can simply have inserted aliens, Martians, Indians wartime, or rebellious cattle rustlers  -  they were all interchangeable and only some of the table-setting changed. All these plots, reflecting reality, were the same thing. The multiple choice part of the assumption was in selecting which group you wished to feature  -  aliens, monsters, radiation-infused ogres, or cowboys and Indians. There was no progression or advancement in the thinking; it all remained tied to the same assumptions. If you wished to visit the future, or time-travel in some way  -  a cumbersome  and primitive rocket ship, advancing at warp-speed through some form of graphic nothing  -  eventually got the travelers there. All the very same mannerisms and assumptions, just underway in some other manner. I saw all this and chuckled. One of the reasons for this, I noticed, was that in every transmutation, evil and madness, wrong and error, were considered always to be the same  -  assumed wrong. Presented as wrong, portrayed as wrong  -  and wrongly too. That was why society failed. It failed because the very same rudimentary people behind all of this advanced nothing. Nothing so much as hoping for worldly gain  -  money and fame. It was pretty ridiculous. When you insist, with layers of falsity, that there must be a 'right', then you've already established that there is also a 'wrong'.

Two other things still jump out at me when I think about Bayonne : my grandmother always had a fear, or made a mention of, going to 'the poorhouse'. A real place, not just a state of being. And, in the same way, she and others would always be talking of the place where poor people lived  -  sort of ad-hoc settlements of shacks  -  as shantytown. Pronounced, oddly enough, 'Shandytown', as if a real, tangible post office place or something. To me it was always very old world  -  just like when she'd derisively call her ex-husband, or any other immigrants, 'greenhorns'  -  as in 'what did he know the difference, the greenhorn, he'd just arrived himself.' Evidently the 'greenhorn' was always a newly-arrived foreign rube, most apt to be taken advantage of or fall for stories; something like the derivation of people selling one another the Brooklyn Bridge  -  'if you believe that, I know a bridge for sale that I can sell you.' Greenhorns bought, I guess. Living in a foreign country, sort of, fathers deserting children and wives, etc., it's all a terrible burden. One does the best one can, under trying circumstances, I'd guess. 'Stinginess is just a fear of death', I've read  -  a fear of going to the poorhouse. In England, I found, and Ireland too, poorhouses were real, functioning places. People would have rather committed suicide than go there. It was an institution everyone feared more than death. Or so I've read  -  without really knowing the truth of it or even its comparison to what went on here. My grandmother had somehow tapped or been tapped into this undercurrent, whatever it was. In England poorhouse people were hired out for five cents a day for manual labor, children and old people included. They were frightened and hungry and terribly mistreated. It was considered unbearable. In this country, all along the lower eastside, the crowded families of immigrants, stuffed by the tens into small ghetto apartments, labored at home or in locked lofts in sweaty garment shops, factories, sweatshops and dens, mostly under a form of lock and key chattel. Not much to be done  -  seven and ten year olds, ripe young girls and boys in their teens, crusty, worn old people and regular family men and women, all working together  -  fabric, buttons, cutting sewing, stitching, trimming., It was hot and hard work. Yet, it was not the poorhouse, here, whatever the difference, I guess the idea was that they'd at least 'chosen' the work themselves. My grandmother at least had kept her little family of three girls together, in one place, raising them. By comparison, in the same Bayonne, my father's mother had lost that power  -  being driven by despair, a suicide attempt, head in the oven, led to her being taken away by the state, deemed insane and kept for the rest of her days in a ward at Greystone.  Her family of five was scattered, and foster-home'd out, all varied and shifting locations. I'm told my father used to shine shoes up and down the avenue, with a little shoeshine box, and at the end of each day or few days, walk all the way to the other side of town to give some good portion of earnings to one of his sisters, for the others to share. Being scattered like that was just another form of abandonment, I'm sure  -  tough on  unity and schooling. A verve-killer to be sure.

I never knew what any of this had to do with me. These were stories, things kept deep and dark never pulled out of the back-closet of family history. When you're a kid, about 5 or 6 you begin slowly waking up to things, you hear things, stuff dawns on you. It's a sloppy, loose world, a world in which you're not yet sure of the rules, or what rules, to operate by, what words to hear or ignore or listen to. It's just an idea that 'everything' can't be exact and right because it's all too conflicting; things crash, roll around, smack into one another. Any one person can't believe everything. there's a point when, as a child, even a kid has to make decisions. It was like that for me  :  who was crazy, who was wrong or right, who did what, why? Who to really believe? What are they all saying anyway, and who's that angry one? It's like walking on glass, not wanting to be cut underfoot but knowing still that you've got to get to the other side. So, in my own family manner, I had to see and listen to many things that seemed very stark, and I really didn't like it that much. Uncle Ray, chopping live eels into chunks and throwing the still live, quivering chunks onto a hot fry pan  -  I guess it was  -  where the pieces, like live nerve endings, still jumped around. Doing this, in fact, while he and my father were still loudly arguing over something. I couldn't grasp that scene, ever. I could never understand the undercurrent of dark sexuality with the 'dirty' jokes the women would hate and the men would love to hear and tell. The deep river of something that ran beneath it all. The distance that kids had to keep. Never knowing what it all meant. Ideas of reverence and respect, rightness and wrong, they were just bandied around like jellied fruit or some measly holiday concoction thrown on a crummy kitchen table. Argumentation, crisis, and shouting. never any sense or deliberation. I wanted, sometimes, a magic bicycle, something to just ride me away. If these were painful things, I guess I had to internalize a lot of that pain. If this was normal, then maybe I was just really normal. But I knew I had my own path, and this wasn't going to be it.

The morning I landed on the streets of Second Avenue it was like a billion degrees; the street-tar was sizzling, bubbles welled up and a hundred bottle caps seemed stuck in the old tar from ages back. The heat was palpable  -  real city heat, hot, viscious, nasty. Radios played, loud, out shabby storefronts  -  tiny, ridiculous places selling the simplest of items, almost a dime at a time. How could anyone make a living selling candy, newspaper and ice? Gum and plastic combs. Baseball cards and showlaces. Totally strange. For the first moments and hours, New York City meant nothing to me but a tomb, newly presented and cut wide open. What was I supposed to do now? Here? These were violently noisy and normal people  -  walking around, talking, sweating, but in all other respects the same as anywhere else, except very localized, far stranger. Many of them seemed already dead, caught, in a trap of, somehow, something.  Nonetheless, I'd made my choice, my bed, so to speak, and now I had to sleep in it  -  as my mother would have put it.



66. The first thing you learn about New York is that it's not 'New York'  -  it's Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, Staten Island, all those weird places with even weirder sections cut out within them: Gravesend, New Lots, Bedford, Riverdale, Todt Hill, Williamsburg. Each one  -  and those are but a few  -  a grimy enclave of self-possessed and ever changing and rotating groups. You can read about all this  -  stuff like 'Gowanus' renaming itself because of the negative aspects, into 'Boerum Hill.' Jonathan Lethem writes about a lot of this, nicely  -   if you ever pick up, say, 'Motherless Brooklyn' or 'Fortress of Solitude'. They're both OK books, and I enjoyed them except for the two banes of modernity which I can't abide : the use of irony , which I detest, and the now-rather-common use by contemporary young writers, of all that superhero bullshit stuff. I can't stand that reference either; it's frothy, childish and juvenile, yet it's more and more prevalent. Too bad. It's all very boring and just makes it apparent to me as the reader that the writer has nothing more than kiddie nostalgia to fall back on. Talk about manchild in the promised land. I always think that a writer has the responsibility of forging onward, past things, not back into them  -  he or she must take the past and molod it forward, so to speak, re-translate those lost moments into a newer and more powerful present; change theworld, in a Rilkean way. it can, and must, be done  -  otherwise who really would want to live with this? So, I do it.

Being plunked down in the middle of all that, (1967 Manhattan) as I was, young and brash, shattered and shocked, was a complete and total new burden. It was heavy. The simple weight of Manhattan alone is enough to weigh down five lifetimes. I felt it immediately  -  coarse people, trucks and cars blaring at all hours, no regard for light or day, shattered gloom and shattered silences, people cavorting, walking about, sleeping, dying, drugged out, doing their business  -  on curb and stoop, in alleys and walkways. One of the most vital keys, of course, is money  -  and I had none.  Manhattan thrives on money; otherwise it's not 'Manhattan'  -  that glittering place of class and adventure that decades and more have taught us of, the style and glamour and good life. Without it, it's just 'New York', a dirty place where you have to find a way to get by. You yourself have to turn dark, learn to wallow, steal, trade, finagle, make strange deals, ply your own talents, so to speak. New York can kill. For me, there were, at most, 25 cent muffins and ten cent cups of coffee. Dumpsters of fresh refuse  -  restaurant food, throw-outs, all perfectly good. Clothing was often found, mostly available. People leave things behind everywhere. Change  -  even dollar bills  -  are found on the street, in gutters and empty lots. People lose money at parking meters and such; never stoop to pick it up, leave it where it falls, even if they do know about it  -  and they often don't. Small-time hustling works, stealing, thieving, taking things. Every sort of trick was out there. The truck lots along the west-side waterways (all gone now) would pay day-work, nothing much, for small tasks. Changing tires, dropping oil, moving things, cleaning. Garage yards and gasoline alleys; they were to be found  -  it wasn't like today, where every liveable space is pretty much lived in, apartments, condos, fancy studios, re-used buildings, old factories now teeming with apartments and tenants. Back then there were blank spots everywhere  -  barren lots, fenced and weedy or open and bare, oily spots with wrecked cars and trucks, piles of refuse and old things  -  beds, mattresses, cans and bottles, junk-heaps of thread, tires, clothes and metal. Nothing much mattered and everything was everywhere. It was 1967, a big, wide, crazy city just entering its own dark ages  - the next thirty years, or twenty anyway, would see grime and infestation close in on New York, slam shut the trap door of deceit and mayhem. Neighborhoods, as they were, fell apart. People took to the streets, living as indigents, winding up anywhere, finding ways to get by without solutions. Rats proliferated, pigeons and dogs and cockroaches and everything else that prospered like that in the grime and filth that became, as well, my home. It was stuff you just didn't think about. I remember, at one point, thinking to myself that, my God, it had been an actual year since I'd washed my hair. I don't know how I remembered exactly such a fact, but it dawned on me at one point. I was pretty messy, but most of what we 'think' of as 'hygeine' is just advertising. The body gets by  -  there are fountains and basins and sinks and bathrooms  -  personal cleaning is easy, my body was fine. I simply neglected my hair, except for the usual rain and wet that took care of what it had to. After a while, I got clothes and shoes and stuff from the draft-dodgers who'd crash on my 11th street floor and leave stuff behind on their trek to Canada from our 'safe-house'. Whatever I needed was around. That didn't matter, and it all went well. Andy Bonamo provided enough change for any real money if it was needed. We never used the stove that I can remember, and I'm not now that sure there was one. There was a filthy old cast-off refrigerator I can recall, but it was rank and nasty. The three rooms were just 'places', much like New York itself  -  just 'Place'. If a mental map was set up, a person could really get by. I think, for myself, between walking and bicycle, I'd gotten to, after some time, most everywhere  -  at least to see and smell it all for myself. I was unconnected to anything, so nothing mattered. There were kids and runaways, hippies, cons and theives everywhere, probably just like me, roaming, fiddling around, sourcing their 'new' lives out of the gutter of the old. If I were to start now re-telling half the things I did or saw, we'd still be here six months from now, and your jaws, I'm sure, would be gaping. I was a soldier on a new divide  -  a new Civil War, and a new Revolution, was raging  -  within me, and without, to steal a phrase. I was right in the middle of whatever I wanted. That's how it went  -  no identification, no name-tags, no way back home and no home way back. Primitive life is like a soup  -  with a taste and feel all of its own. You throw things in, they mix and steam, change the overall flavor a little bit, keep it all grueling around, and it makes, well enough, a sensible slop to eat. I used to think, back then, of my father and my family, neighbors and all those other people with whom I'd grown up; how effete they were, really, even in their own lower-class stations of life. One hundred and fifty years previous to their time, would they have really survived? Wood fires, cutting, hammering, clawing, building, hunting, finding and making food, drink, outhouses, travel or the lack of it, animal husbandry, no outside entertainments to waste them away and fiddle their time to nothing, their brains in shreds, no trips, no returns  -  all was hardship and all was work. Would they have settled in and prospered through all that? I thought not, or I thought anyway that they were too innured and softened up with all their stupid suburban insanity to figure out the leap they'd somehow made  -  shelves of Campbell Soup and shelves of bread and water. I felt, as I waded through all the stories, tales and places of old New York, that I was closer in everyway to the real past that they'd willingly missed. Knives and steel, cutting and taking, were all part of it. Like Villon, I was a master thief by necessitiy and  -  almost  -  a killer just to live. I'd leaped a gap, a gap they couldn't fathom nor understand. Soon enough, the dumb, commercial bastards behind it all would even steal that phrase  -  selling hippie jeans by the cartload as 'The Gap'. I had to wonder to myself, what the real-fuck was going on? The wonder of it all is in how greatly everything changed, and how swiftly. It was like a complete turnover  -  the only people cutting woold now were the rich, who would use it for their trophy fireplaces in big homes; probably purchased (this wood) by the cord and delivered, for the most part, but perhaps cut some by them too. The regular, small people, the proverbial peasants, wouldn't any longer have the gumption or patience to do that  -  living in swell shacks, oil-heated and gas-air heated. Any aspects of 'primitive' had long ago disappeared. I can well remember, in 1971, of learning that the vast percentage of household heating in Iran was then still done by kerosene heat  -  which is really no big deal and not unheard of now  -  and being amazed at the rank primitivism of that. It's just how it sounded and how it stood out. It stood out because all the USA modern materialism had been drummed into our heads for years. The grand 'American' spirit has always tried to encompass these great, old ideas and ways, all the things of a 'gloried' past, of free men speaking their minds and standing up for things, to hold onto them and pretend they were still operative.  That's a lie, and always has been. By 1965 the lie of it all had grown to such proportions as to be insufferable.



There were, as I said, parts of New York that were still amazing  -  the far reaches of Brooklyn were still very cool and solid; old. I want to say primitive but I've already overused that. Red Hook, and all its deck hands and stevedores, tough gang-men and workers, street-thugs and coarse, wizened strongmen.  It was killer-central too. Rubouts, maulings, hurtings, whatever you wanted. That was a place where you went if you really wanted to find out the 'real' of anything. One wrong move and you could be wiped off the face of the land forever. Gravesend. The far, marshy reaches of places like City Island and Breezy Point. Things just went there to die, stay forever. Every so often I'd read of a writer from the past  -  Hart Crane, Albert Pinkham Ryder, Walt Whitman  -  people with somehow 'Brooklyn' connections who in the dark nights of their souls went way out to these places  -  on the ends of subway lines, at the ends of long stretches of dubious roadway  -  to face their demons, to sort out their crisis-moments, to muse on Death and taxes, so to speak. It was all there. Money held no place in the battered wallet of this existence. In Avenel our next door neighbor, Ralph Miranda, and his family, were transplanted Brooklynites who somehow managed to end up on Inman Avenue, in Avenel. Ralph went back to Brooklyn each day for work at the Schaefer Beer plant. How and why he did it, I never knew. They never really seemed like Brooklynites to me, but that was their deal. I used to look at them to try and figure out a place and a means. They had in-laws and parents who would come to visit in big Pontiacs, with those strange, ochre-colored NY license plates I'd always loved seeing. Brooklyn always seemed so odd and awe-inspiring. Now, by 1967, there I was, wandering; with Brooklyn too, spinning and wild, all before me.

The only thing not spinning wildly before me was wildlife. DDT and a complete profit-induced disregard for Nature had pretty much undone everything. There were no wild animals anywhere  -  the land was clean and still. A raccoon was unheard of, as much as any other ground creature. Development had killed them off, their habitats were gone and chemicals did the rest. No deer, which now are pretty much once again plentiful. That's all a revolution unto itself that is little remarked upon  -  as a people, some force anyway, has reclaimed a part of the naturalness of life, allowed things back in, replenished the urban and suburban lost. Groundogs, egrets, terns, deer, possum, any and all of that - at least  -  are back, if not happily allowed back. The dark side of the human spirit would still prefer these things undone. but Life proclaims itself anew. I say thankfully. The rank sterility of those 1950's and 60's years was startling  -  then and now too. The sky was always steely gray, the clouds and formations usually masked by smog and soot. Factories (when we actually 'made' anything) just inconsiderably belched their smokes  -  it was considered a necessary adjunct. Much had been sacrificed to make the greater industrial good bring us the products which people somehow thrived on and demanded more of  -  tars and macadams, and their smells; fumes and diesel, gasoline and exhaust; noise and the rest. It was all pretty incredible  -  so much had been sacrificed. But no one had ever really been asked about it first, it was all just taken. Along Hudson Street, people like Jane Jacobs and the good, staunch, brash Village crowd demanded take-backs and retrievals, Dorothy Day and the Mission crowd fought for goodness, at the least. The Bowery crowd staggered into its own dark field of interest, yet out of it came some good, solid voices and movements. Art and power were trying to join together and bring things back to a better equilibrium. I was there, and I wanted part of it  -  Judson Church, the anti-war movement, the Living Theater, and the anti-Monsanto poison movement too. Entire hillsides and geographic areas were being decimated, here and all over the world, by the nasty poisons and killing sprays of that big, filthy company right beneath the Skyway. The ground was foul, no one cared about Death and its minions  - a war was being (yet again) fought  -  somewhere else and, hopefully, as far away as it could be kept, but it was underway. Fortunes were made, groups pillaged and controlled. Corporate good demanded  -  always  -  expansion. Parts of the metropolitan area had become so foul that, from a shoreline, you couldn't see a skyline, a vice-versa. That there was a silent revolution underway  -  against the media snobs, the sickening merchants, the talk-show idiots, the political types went mostly unremarked. It was a silent war, and I'd say most of it worked. New York City was the belly of this voracious beast, and it had to be stopped. At the same, parallel time, the anti-war and anti-militaristic faction fought its own more noisy revolution  -  not near as successful was that one  -  but we live with the remnants. Awareness and better life-quality, at least in that manner. There are animals. There are fish, and water with fish in it. And they thrive where before only Death and Suburbia existed. The stupid, plodding dumbness of endless growth still goes on. It's a constant, steady battle. But there is a place in Hell already provided for developers, and sold-out politicians too. I always felt ready for, and I always felt as if I'd like to be, a Revolution and a revolutionary firebrand. It would not have caused me one minute's blinking to have gone at and killed people  -  a bullet to the forehead would have been fine enough  -  every shit-squandered  politician and organization-mouth I ran across. I wouldn't have thought twice about taking down the super-structure of whatever it was. Nowadays, terror and revolt have a different face  -  it's all been painted as vile and weird and nasty and evil. It's not, and that's the sort of propaganda that the 'other' side has to effect in order to keep people in place and stay where it is. There's always thinking going on. They're all on top, and they mean to preserve that on-topness. That part of mass-revolution is long over. The heart and soul of Mankind has long ago been killed off by Evil, in corporate suits and ties. You can argue this shit all day long, for as long as you want. I know what it is I'm saying. I'll stand by it. They all deserve death.


My own dreams of grandiosity had always involved cleansing. I really never saw horror in that, and  -  truthfully  -  probably still don't.  The world would be a lot cleaner and more sensible place with a few less hundreds of million of people.The masked fact of everything is that there are far too many of us, the control types have been allowed to take over  -  which is a paradox and a dilemma of its own  -  and nothing much gets done over it except exploitation. Once they were allowed  -  over the ages  -  to define the problem and write the narrative, all on their own terms, we were stuck with it. Government. Rulers, popes and conditions all came at once  -  secularism masked as religion, and the rest of it all. People seem to think that this Life goes on forever. They tend not to realize the futility of their ventures; how it's all over in short instant, how the amassing and keeping of valued items, signs of success, money and goods, all goes for naught. The want of something is not the having of it. The wish is NOT the deed, no matter what others say  -  for their own benefit. I used to dream of straightening things out. I don't any longer  -  having moved on past the remnants of that pallid reality which always seems ready and barking on about something, like some old, black dog thoughtlessly tied to a post in the yard at an old, dirty doghouse. Untended and growling, this dog just continues. It really needs, instead, a mercy shot. So, anyway, all that love and peace and goodness stuff that was marching around me in New York City in 1967  -  from Judson Church, yes, to all those crowds and wailings at peace marches and campus hoo-hahs, all of it went on, and I understood and saw clearly what it was and what it was for, but I never really shared any of it. The top, as I saw it, had to be pulled down, destroyed  -  as well as the bottom. Pretty simple. The shock of one assassination after the other  -  it wasn't really much, 3, 4, 5 maybe  -  and was just media stuff anyway. There was no shock; just a more 'resigned' attitude over the pathways that life takes. It's a tough gamble.You stick your finger up, in the wind, as it's said, and sometimes it gets shot off. Live with it, get over it. Life goes on, the shock and the stoppage of sorrow or awe does nothing. Murder and killing have always been with us, over all of America's years  - all those strange dudes in Congresses and Statehouses everywhere in the early years of the Republic  -  duels, murders, betrayals, whippings, bludgeoning, etc  -  that's how they made their points  -  Thomas Jefferson's whole idea about the renewal of revolutions every so often, just to keep things straight and squared up. Sometimes it just gets more brutal than others. I liked all that; to my mind it kept things fresh, gave some resounding meaning to the junk I'd been taught since 6th grade about what we were 'supposed' to be about as a nation. By 1967, everyone was afraid of everything  - no one wanted a line out of sequence, the colors had to stay within the lines. I saw that, but I remained adamant in saying 'why?' People were idiots, still are  -  the mass of men lead lives of quiet consternation, mis-information, disinclination, and - yes - desperation. Thoreau only got a quarter of it all. 


In fact, in my reckoning, the choice I made was pretty simple, and probably life-altering. I'd had to decide, just about that time, Summer '67, what it was I was going to do  -  I could have, with and among the people I had become part of, turned towards the violent and the revolutionary  -  the guns, the shooting and looting, the 11th Street bomb-making, all those plans for disruption and injury, but I didn't. I walked away instead. There were all the others, doing what they did  -  I just watched. A wary eye, a distance, those were my best connection. I just had not the energy to put up with the excesses and the baiting, the control and management necessary. Anyway  -  and I may have said this before  -  what was most apparent to me was that this entire anti-establishment thing, the whole peace and love apparatus burgeoning everywhere, was really at heart just a Jewish excess. Inspired by a very seductive, mama's boy sort of familial acquaintance with a thing like 'My son, the revolutionary! Now he thinks he's starting a riot, to change things!' Like some old Mrs. Goldberg routine. That's not anti-Semitic, by the way; my saying that is a simple reflection of reality, the way things were, and my realization of it. Start with Mark Rudd, add Abbie Hoffman, and go on from there. Sorry. Who else, after all, could be so possessed as to the turning of things around? What better commitment was there to this than the strait-jacketed management of repressed adulthood. For myself I found that there was a greater alternative, a severe 'other-side' to it all. I dedicated, lock, stock, and barrel, any and all of that I was going to do, to Art instead. Fuck the Revolution. It wasn't going to be my place. I could have taken that step, I could have crawled over other bodies, been a murderer, seduced by the tone of the musics around me. There already were dead bodies, and I wanted no more of it. Naivete itself had been killed in me. By contrast, Art reserved a place for my heart and soul to stay. And my mind. It gave me separateness, distance, and a refuge wherein none of that crap mattered. That was it for me on 11th Street. I once left and never returned until it was over  -  when I did return, I advanced backwards into a barren scene, of desolation, of a police-ribboned, empty apartment  -  not a thing left but an old refrigerator, somehow with the carcass of a stripped turkey still within it and no electricity to cool it. I went to the Studio School's basement, where I lived the rest of my time, unknown to anyone outside. I had now to pretend to know nothing. That seemed easy enough to do. Had I not gotten out then, when I did, I'm pretty sure that entire grimy system would have taken me in, ground me up, and spit me out the other end, from some nasty conveyor of sausage. Or I'd be in prison with the likes of Bernadette Dohrn, Cathy Boudin,  Bill Ayers, and any of the rest of that crowd. Or dead.

I always did find a lot of the problems of 'society' had roots in sentimentality -  of the most simple sort. And it's, as well, the most fundamental and the easiest thing to do in order to slog off responsibility or problems to be faced. All one needs is just to go to 'sentiment' and the crowd is won over. Which is why politicians and all the creeps of that usual stripe revert to it primarily and foremost. Stand in front of a crowd, with dreams of word-tyranny and personal predominance. The most open route is, of course, the route of pleasing people, telling them what they wish to hear or that which they already believe. Reinforcing, as it were, their stasis, their fear and refusal to move. Think of any of it  -  Great Society, New Frontier,one-fourth of a nation unclothed and unfed, all that gibberish   -  all the way down through American politics, from the start  -  and you can see its prevalence, even while  -  behind it all  -  Evil lurks and polishes its shiny head. Thus always, and thus now. There's no difference.

Sentimentality and its attendant smoothness were allover Inman Avenue and Avenel, It was easy, and it was how things ran, how all the assumptions went. Once I got to New York, one of the first things I realized was that all of that was over. It was gruff. It was barking  -  a harsher by far, more feverish activity of cutthroat survival and materialism with all else at bay. On the lower, and lowest rungs anyway, survival is what counted. Making sure the deal worked, finding means to get by and stay alive, if not 'solvent'. New York City solvency is a relativistic term anyway, as the entire city is your warehouse  -  for things, goods, food and money. If you are not 'solvent', five minutes later you'll run across a means of being so again, quickly. Coal mines and steel mills, Pittsburgh and Gary, Indiana and the Haymarket people, all that rest, they all had their leaders and union-busters and thugs. They were focused and simplified on one project  -  the one at hand. In New York it was broader than that  -  there were handlers everywhere, all over the place; whatever hustle you got involved in could easily lead you to five more  -  what was left of the 52nd street jazz clubs and jazz lofts processed small drugs like honey-water, the east village tramps and runaways gobbled up marijuana, LSD, STP, and anything else brought their way like a tap at Niagara Falls  -  full of constant running water, over and on top of any obstacles; drowning people. The hot-ass rich people up in the 50's and 60's east, they wanted gentility with their proper drugs. They wished for delivery, and total discretion. They sought couriers. The bag men and paper-money people had to be always kept off to the side, please. Guys would drive in daily to work, from places in Long Island, and under the guise of business they'd juggle both the legit and the illegitimate levels, never caring how and when the two passed. As long as their cash value and liquidity remained OK. Small men and big men were both the same  -  active, on the make, and uncaring. I almost want  to say everyone was crooked. I almost want to say Business was crooked and all America is in on it and on the take.  (OK, there, I've said it. Let it stand). That was how skyscrapers got built and plots of land got deeded  -  old brownstones and strips of old buildings, down in a minute, replaced  -  for a few years  -  with a crummy parking lot and Puerto-Rican hires as attendants and cash runners for prostitution and drugs and stolen goods  -  and sometimes dead bodies too  -  until a new deal could be made to put up a big building wihch would amass and make legitimate even all this scrambling and double-dealing, The city was corrupt, and as busy at it as mice. Mayor Wagner, what did he know? Actually, no, the question should be  -  for all those guys  -  Mario Procaccino, Ed Koch, Abe Beame, and all the rest  -  what did they not know. There's no question mark because you'd never get an answer anyway. New York was always run by names  -  The Dukes and the Biddles, the Astors and the Beekmans, Frelinghuysans and Morgans. In my days there, many of the very old names  -  and some not so old  -  were still around, and flippant. Abraham Ribicoff, Henry Barnes, John Linsday -  any of those people were east side royalty. Something like that, when you live there, you just get used to. Riverside Drive, from the 60's up through the 80's, was big time. Each block represented and held something else, eastward, was on walked across towards the park. It was another world  -  and then you to the real gold world in the east  -  Sutton and Beekman Places, for starters. People th
ere wore their famed garters on the outside, letting everything of themselves glitter and shine. It was their moment  -  soon enough it would all come crashing down.

Clifford Odets wrote something of that difference between 'creativity', the artist, and the rest of the world. He said, of the writer or the artist creating : 'I am part of that universe, that tradition. I am able to create. Only God can give you greater harmony. And since we don't deal with God in the modern age, Art is the biggest satisfaction that man can get out of life. Every author and artist knows that and tries to express that joy of creating.' And Tennesee Williams wrote : 'I'm not alone when I'm alone. I didn't go to the moon, I went much further. But time is the distance between two points.' Stella Adler said, of this : 'Who the hell knows what he's talking about. He knows, but it's hard to penetrate. He's trying to tell the truth, which involves trying to express the inexpressible. 'I'm going to tell you how I feel inside' is impossible to do. But he has tremendous passion. He's the artist versus the warrior. The two strengths are in conflict.  Please take note  -  I put that in here quite deliberately.


68. I still remember the virgin snows of my youth  -  those prison farm fields, after a nice 5 or 6 inch snowfall, sometimes enough to cover the corn-stubble left, would seem to stretch endlessly as a new, cold, white sheet of reality. I'd trudge mercilessly through them, leaving alone only my own footsteps behind me. I always wanted to walk ahead, going forward, but realized already that the only trace of this you can get is when you look behind. 'The future's uncertain and the end is always near' - in a few years or a decade to come, those silly words would be on the lips of all of the 'youth'   -  uncertain for sure, but relevant to what I was, way back then, trudging through. It's funny how things work. Also, in years to come, those prison fields would be long gone  - replaced as I stated by the atrocity of the State School and that entire idea of putting people away, no matter, in this case, the reason. My point is not about that. That construction took place, as it seemed, in  a whirlwind - no one saying a thing. Since I was mostly away during that time, the few periods I'd be at home all I sensed was noise; back there the operation underway was too sad to even watch. Huge platoons of earthmovers, cranes and tractors were assembled to level, cut and parcel out the fields and tree lines. Everything had to go and no one cared. The world seemed truly insane to me. Then, slowly and one by one, these bizarre George Jetson inspired, futuristic-like space-pod huts were erected. Not in any way the normal, institutional, age-old architecture known, these instead seemed to be inspiring an idea of modern, futuristic efficiency. It was incredible to me. I couldn't believe somehow the brashness of the idea of a 'Government' entity stepping in like that, dictating both the exposure and style of its project  -  all the while insinuating its right to take people over  -  acres and acres of huts, food-centers, boiler buildings, parking garages for equipment, a hospital building, a morgue, and officious 'Administration' building  -  seemingly staffed, as I'd later learn, by puffed-up autocratic despots and rank filers and check-listers. It was pretty horrible. Macadam roadways and parking lots came next. It became strange to look out back and see  -  instead of stubble and field and distance  -  cars moving about, strange people hanging on the fences, just staring out, grunting or involved in their own conversational dramas, and the entire array of concrete and brick. As if everyone had just given up, ceded their territory, all of Inman Avenue just seemed to have stopped looking out in that direction. What is it that makes these sort of things happen? Progress, back then, was the word used. Nowadays no one even uses that word, which has fallen away as if it were Olde English or something. There is no 'Progress' anymore. I think we've reached saturation on that point. Everything now is far more ethereal, 'virtual' as the word goes. Things have simply been 'reached', in the real world sense  -  there is no more to go in that direction. All movement now is towards things that don't really 'possess' a reality  -  it's all concept and theory; assumptions you need first to assume. Which is pretty much what I've always said about reality anyway. No one knows it, but now it's everywhere. We are what we are not  -  and that's seemingly what everyone is now busy chasing or seeking to have, the 'are not'. That's my discovery, my contribution to the New Physics. Higgs Boson, meet the 'Are Not'. Nobel Prize here I come.
A curious thing about the State School was its architectural idea, considered very forward-thinking in 1963 and that era, of satellite pod buildings, all separate and free-standing, yet connected, invisibly, underground, out of site, by the basic infrastructure of tubes, wires, conduits, etc., for heat, power, water, steam and all the rest. There was a certain modern magic involved, seemingly. Now, even that seems archaic, and looking at those structures today makes one shudder at their base and primal institutionalism  -  no matter the style and the attempt. As I think about it, it so resembles  -  in spite of all things  -  the way of the virtual world and the Internet confederation supplying information to everyone. Scary, in a way, to think how that too will all look in forty years. As archaic and primal as these huts, doing the same thing in their desultory, physical and wired  way?
In the fall of 1966, in spite of all else, I decided that I would write a book, or at least a long, detailed treatment, of Eugene O'Neill's life and plays, amidst the social environment of his time. I never completed it, but spent much time that Fall and Winter delving into O'Neill  -  libraries mostly. It was a detailed, youthful quest for something  -  we all have them  -  and I grafted my own onto the back of Eugene O'Neill. What started as an idea became something of a localized obsession, stuffed in between the cracks of my time. Really, what did I know? It all began with my interest in The Golden Swan, in Greenwich Village, :  "[Golden Swan Garden - Situated on the southeast corner of the intersection of West Fourth Street and Sixth Avenue, this newly created viewing garden rests on what once was the site of the Golden Swan Café. A gilded life-size figure of a swan was perched outside the three-story brick building, which was constructed in the mid-1800s. The operator of the Irish saloon—known to regulars as the Hell Hole—was Thomas Wallace, a former prizefighter who also lived upstairs. Wallace died on the premises in 1922, but not before his tavern became the haunt of neighborhood artists and writers including the American playwright, Eugene Gladstone O’Neill (1888-1953).
As a member of the theater troupe the Provincetown Players, O’Neill was often at their playhouse on MacDougal Street and frequently dropped in to drink at the Golden Swan. In a 1919 letter to his first wife Agnes, O’Neill recounts a trip to the Hell Hole in the midst of the Prohibition era, where he says there was no whiskey at the time but sherry was still relatively cheap at 20 cents a drink. On hearing that a song by Lefty Louie, a Hell Hole bartender, would soon be performed on Broadway, O’Neill wrote, “I think all the hours seemingly wasted in the H.H. would be justified if they had resulted in only this.” His astute observations about human nature came to influence his many works and brought him widespread recognition on Broadway and around the world. He won the Nobel Prize for literature in 1936 and Pulitzer Prizes for four of his plays. In fact, the Golden Swan served as part of the basis for the setting of O’Neill’s The Iceman Cometh, first produced on Broadway in 1946 and later revived in 1956. With a cast including Jason Robards, this production was directed by Jose Quintero at Circle in the Square Theatre’s original location at Sheridan Square, not far from this site. The play’s main characters were modeled after people O’Neill knew and met at the saloon, including Harry Hope, based on real-life proprietor Wallace. O’Neill was one of many writers, artists, intellectuals, and activists who were attracted to Greenwich Village, its cheap rent, and quaint brownstones in the early 1900s. It was here—nurtured in its sundry cafes, taverns, and restaurants—that a unique, revolutionary spirit of creative energy and freedom of thought blossomed and shaped the Village’s bohemian character. The Village’s first tearoom, called The Mad Hatter, once stood directly to the east of this garden at 150 West Fourth Street. The site of this garden was also inspiration for painter John French Sloan (1871-1951), who came to New York in 1904 and worked for some time as a freelance illustrator. With Robert Henri, he organized an exhibition of a group of urban realist painters, known as “The Eight” or the “Ashcan School,” who challenged traditional notions of art. Having moved to the Village in 1912, Sloan lived with his wife Dolly at 240 West 4th Street and at 88 Washington Place. He also had an eleventh-floor studio at 35 Sixth Avenue, a triangular building on the southwest corner across the street from this garden. During a clandestine midnight picnic at the top of the Washington Arch in nearby Washington Square Park on January 23, 1917, Sloan and a group of actors and artists including Marcel Duchamp went so far as to declare Greenwich Village its own independent nation. The scene depicted in Sloan’s Arch Conspirators (1917) is one of his many works that give a glimpse of city life during his time. In 1917, Sloan also made an etching of the interior of the Hell Hole, in which Eugene O’Neill is portrayed sitting at a table in the upper-right hand corner. His painting, The City from Greenwich Village, includes a view of this corner, looking downtown toward the financial district, with the Sixth Avenue elevated train crossing the scene. In 1928, the Golden Swan building was demolished for the construction of the Sixth Avenue subway. On June 8, 1934, by permit from the Board of Transportation, Parks was given jurisdiction over this parcel of land, and a playground was opened to the public here on October 14, 1935. The property was officially assigned to Parks by the Board of Estimate on August 27, 1953, and it is one of several small parks in the area that line Sixth Avenue—including the adjacent West 4th St. Courts, Minetta Green, Minetta Square, Minetta Lane Playground, Churchill Square and Charlton Plaza. Continuing in the innovative traditions of the neighborhood, the site was used as a recycling center in the 1980s. The Village Green Recycling Team held a champagne reception here on January 6, 1984 to kick off a program of collecting newspapers, glass, aluminum, and tin for recycling every Saturday. The recycling program ended with the advent of large-scale recycling by the Department of Sanitation in the 1990s. In 1999, Mayor Giuliani contributed $80,000 for a Requirements Contract to begin to turn this formerly bedraggled open patch of asphalt and concrete into a garden. Council Member Christine Quinn allocated $158,000 in additional capital funding to complete the renovation of the garden, including the installation of new granite curbs, an ornamental steel fence, a toolshed and a jardiniere urn. Completed in winter of 2000, the garden also features bluestone and asphalt block paths, and a number of trees such as the Japanese dogwood ( Cornus kousa), Flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), Serbian spruce (Picea omorika), Japanese maple (Acer japonica), Dawn redwood (Metasequora glyptostroboides), and Saucer magnolia (Magnolia x soulangiana). ]"  I never did get to any conclusion, as I said, but this little project kept me going for a while. I was fascinated somehow by the dark family connections O'Neill seemed always to be writing about. Long Day's Journey Into Night; Desire Under the Elms; the Iceman Cometh, and more. First off, I was fascinated by how people in the profession referred to these titles as 'Iceman', and 'Desire', and 'Long Day's Journey'  -  as of a coarse, quipping shorthand for only those in the know. How fascinating must it be, I thought, to be within a small society that had such familiarity with something like that. How wonderful to be a part of a group that had no cares, at the same time, for the commonplace stuff of driveways and possessions and homes. These were bohemians, of the sort that acted; itinerants, bounding from playhouse to playhouse and stage to stage  -  black-curtains, blacked-out sets and scrims, high-up lighting bars and stools upon which to sit and proclaim lines and diction. The rest of the sorry world  -  to Hell! It was already forty years ago then, but I sensed I knew exactly what O'Neill was doing, was up to.  I was fascinated by the Provincetown Playhouse I saw on Macdougal Street   -   that Georgian-looking, staid almost, playhouse. It was right up there, for me, in righteousness, with the old Northern Dispensary not far away   -  where even Poe had puked his brains out. I found myself loving that stuff, and just wanting to run away forever, backwards in time if need to, to be there, to be somewhere else, to be anywhere.
And then I was there. Right plunked in the middle of it all  -  NYC and Greenwich Village, both the old and the new, the changed and the unchanged. I had a go on my own proclamation. Yes, looking back I knew I'd never finished that O'Neill thing. O'Neill was all family  -  issues, fires raging, doubts. 'His issues are large : But he is pessimistic. He says there is no way out, every man is groping blindly, nothing and nobody can save him. That's why he's so passionate. The thing that holds you together is smashed. There's no religion to hold onto. This is writing with tremendous energy, tremendous darkness, tremendous pessimism, tremendous hope.' That's what was said anyway  -  I was near to starting that but I never got clear or sure of the posits used. Futility was one thing, but O'Neill was something else  - 'He vomits it through layer after layer until the deep sickness finally comes out. He digs and digs and digs until the person says 'Yes! I want to sleep with my mother!' and has to kill himself.'  Do you see what I was up against, at age 16. I was sort of frozen out of my own realm : I have to admit, stating categorically, that no matter what the head doctors and analysts and the rest say, I never, ever wished to sleep with my mother, and actually never gave it a thought. I neither knew where these ideas came from nor what sort of freaky individuals came up with this stuff. That was my stumbling block - I couldn't see myself furthering an argument or even an approach to something coming out of that. First off, that was way too much volume for anything I wished to do. Second, I almost kept getting offended by the anguished assumptions. My approach was different; I posted my flag more in the direction of old, bohemian stuff, weird and jagged lifestyles amidst the dangling and corrupt past of New York City. None of those psychological approaches meant anything to me. My idea of this work on O'Neill was a dark, deep portrait. That other stuff was more like neon and glitz.
Too many distractions are deadly  -  60 years ago, one would think, there were fewer. That's not the case. They were just different  -  on all levels there are always distractions, dream-things or people drawing you away.  Trying to reach through Eugene O'Neill was probably one of the bigger failures of my life. I just let it go  -  all that precise darkness and anxiety. I don't mind any of that, but it's the 'preciseness' of it that finally got to me and drove me off. The unwavering concentration on bleakness  -  through soul, through family matters, through lineage and legacy. I just never got all that. I felt, by contrast, happiest and freest when I I knew that I was breaking all that, getting away, leaving all those ratty encumbrances behind. For O'Neill they were deadly, cast in stone. For me, they were nothing; I knew I could break free. There was a certain era of American society when maybe all that was true  -  which is what attracted me in the first place, as I've stated. But not the dour, unending, trapped darkness I saw. The teens and twenties, those Greenwich Village and NY bohemia days, they were like the barracuda swimming through my waters  -  what I watched for, that which I examined. O'Neill was in there, but I'd lost him. Sometime in the early 1980's the movie 'Reds' came out  -  I found it covered some of this, and O'Neill, in ways I'd been trying but failed to finish. O'Neill's people are full of anger  -  no creative spark, no real 'moment-wonder'. Even if that anger isn't much 'motivated', they are, in and of themselves, trapped by it but only because they won't let go, won't see past it. Being angry or disappointed in oneself is an internal thing  -  no matter what else you've been given or achieved  -  and it stays in place, leaving one disappointed and dysfunctional. Unable, if not disabled.  O'Neill's people were all disabled. I wasn't about that. I don't like disabled, functionless people  -  the ones who have to find their shortcomings, the whys' of why their stalled  -  finding medical excuses for this and society's mistakes for that, it's all the same, I say  -  screw 'em, let it go. It makes you mad, makes you love and hate without reason  -  you go wherever it leads you. That's O'Neill; almost like a blind man pretending at seeing, or maybe the other way around. Darkness, screaming. It's said it's all Irish  -  O'Neill's family matters, his lifeline. To me, in the same way, it was Italian  -  those screeching emotives, those whining, super-intense aunts and uncles, always going on in dark rapture about this or that disappointment. So anyway, you look at things, you find what doesn't fit, and you throw it away. That was my viewpoint.

'What O'Neill does more than any other American playwright before him is delve into the inside, which is complicated. Although his speech is vernacular, down-to-earth, with no pretense, the text has something mystic about it...' I'd read that, but I couldn't get past what it was trying to say, and anyway the point was missed. O'Neill was about the old trap, the family sewer, the people who continually squiggled in their cages. He wrote as if there was nothing real outside, but that's where I meant to be  -  out there, somewhere else, in the fog.

Long Day's Journey Into Night, (O'Neill), Glass Menagerie, Streetcar, (Williams), Death Of a Salesman (Miller), and perhaps even After The Fall (Miller)  -  the more I studied all of them the more I realized they were each pretty much about the same thing. Personal traps. I never liked personal traps. The entire idea of a play anyway  -  from script to through production  -  is about skeleton. The playwright writes the skeleton, the rest of the people provide the skin. That's what you see and get  -  the accumulated effort of the artifice. You've got to be willing to go with it, suspend a disbelief, as they say  -  movies too, probably moreso. It' s set-up for you to believe in for two hours or whatever. I always wanted to move on  -  knowing that every chair, every light bulb, every aside, burp, shuffle or bend, was put it specifically for its presence; to go on that journey, for the viewer, the journey I was never willing to take. Plays are too literal. If they're not, they're instead just pretension; a gobbledy-gook with lighting and action, and an audience which thinks they're something else.

All these plays just mentioned, for example, well at least they still had a footfall into reality  -  situations and undertakings, with feelings behind them, that could be explored.  Through the period of time I'm here talking of the plays themselves advanced towards yet another point  -   into an almost-absurdity that became hard to defend, or understand  -  past narrative and places entire of the grounded world and into a must more precious world of simply theatre-going and pretension, with the puffery of those attending taking foremost position. Stella Adler put it thusly :  'Samuel Beckett had a kind of pretentious audience. When Waiting For Godot opened in Florida, they had a lot of trouble because nobody understood it. So they brought it to New York, and the New York management very cleverly said, 'This is a play by Samuel Beckett whom you don't know, and it's only for intellectuals.' The house was sold out because the management said, 'You're not going to understand it.' People still don't understand it. That's how you know it's a masterpiece.' That's what it had come down to.  Isaac Bashevious Singer once said, 'If you want to read Proust, open it up and read two or three pages, and if they don't give you great stimulation, don't worry about it, put the book down. You're not supposed to read the whole thing, Everybody says, 'Did you get to the fourth volume?' It's pretension.  To get through Proust you have to have nothing else to do in life.'
By 1962,  that's where I was headed, mentally; that sort of thinking. By 1967 it seemed, on the other hand, I had exhausted that one avenue of thought  -  that sort of linear thought most visible in the work of plays on stage, or plays being read. It's all very simplistic  -  you get what the writer is saying, all those old themes, old quarrels, etc., and you get it because the very structure of the writing is harsh and linear  - thus reducing its themes and actions to the same. One person says this, another that, and a third interjects, all put together by speakers' names, lines and stage directions,  with colons and parentheses and asides. Taxing. Rough. Most of the people I met in the drama world were  -  by the way  -  of ambiguous sexuality. It seemed to go together with the very substance of the theater  -  all that fussy worrying about fabric and set and lighting, approaches entrances and exits, lights and shadings. The emotive aspects of voices pealing. In hindsight now it's all easy to see, and most very obvious. Back then, a lot of it I glossed right over and it went unnoticed. It's just the theater world. It's all very ill-defined anyway  -  no one cares much what you're doing. Back in those days there was, except in the outer world, no real care or distinction of who was doing what with whom, and what equipment was being exchanged. Artists and dancers and actors and musicians; that entire world overlapped : queers, homos, lesbians, and the rest. It was under-board, not so pronounced as now, and everyone got by. Believe me, anyone researching any of this down through the last three hundred years, ending with NYC, would be surprised at what they found. Walt Whitman was not alone.
In the seminary, Father Alexander was my drama guy, my New York representation of all this, in 1962 and up. He was like the anti-church, dressed up for church (as a priest) but bringing everything the church  wasn't of the church at all. All that theatrical fussiness I've mentioned, the odd turns toward glamour and glitter, the twists of language and the very way things were spoken, it was all a captive  -  and dare I  say  -  gay paradise. Nothing else to do except discuss how to say this or how to phrase this; practice that diction, re-work that entrance. It was like being a florist and living all day amidst flowers and blooms. It came, and then it all went away. The entire atmosphere was suspect, but only if you looked it through, carefully, and were willing to accept what you saw. The most incredible part of it all, to me, was the odd acquiescence of parents, almost sacrificing, willingly, their young boys to this arcana of psychological debauchery. Many of the parents that I saw  -  visiting days, shows and the like  -  were first or second generation Europeans; lots of Greeks and Italians with all that old-world tradition and hardness still in place. To them it was some sort of miraculous enterprise that they'd be getting a direct line to God, conceptually anyway, by having a child within the church. That made them overlook everything else. That crap still held meaning for them, like traditional foods and native feasts. The door to the stairway to Heaven had been opened directly to them, because of their son's 'vocation', and nothing else was going to detour that  -  sacrificing the human manliness of being a regular man was not a problem. In a way, it was sad to see, and I wanted sometimes to slap them awake.  Also, funny to me  -  and this happened only a few times  -  were the families to whom this whole 'church' thing by their son was the hugest, most demoralizing step downward they could imagine. These were usually the succesfull executive types  -  the white men and their proud wives, with money, perhaps lawyers or accountants, industrialists or somesuch. Realizing what their son had gotten involved with seemed simply to mute them, and they either humored him or just let it happen  -  the black-sheep kid, the one with the odd proclivities. I knew this from the few, mostly Monmouth County professional class people, whom I'd see waltzing in with their child. Thus, of the two extremes, I was firmly on the side of the first  -  enormously obscure, enormously naive. Yet, my secret weapon was my alliance in sum with Father Alexander, with the entire other side.

69. This is one of my end-results, as described in the last chapter, of my own drama-writing. Based on what you've just read, take it as you will  -  the total end-result of the fruition of this effort:

HOW I'D BEGUN
WRITING DRAMA:
Part 1. It started:
"('Yes' - he stares intently while speaking forthrightly,
 'I would imagine that you've already taken your share of that
fortune, no?')...When I read something old by LeRoi Jones -
Dutchman, Toilet, Urinal, I forget - one of those things - I
realized that people talk even as they walk. It happens, and
not just on stage. (Marginalia : instructions for the stage, small
notes about this and that. Yes, it has its moments, interesting,
fun).What is this guy thinking about? Getting at? He speaks
flatly, while moving one boot up onto the shelf. He begins to
lace it while propping himself up.
-
Mark Twain Tonight, Hal Holbrook. A Doxology plays in
the background as the stage lights, at first quite dim, come
up slowly - all we hear is Holbrook's voice mimicking
Twain : 'I don't care about a God-damned thing. Lands!
This world is full of shit!'
-
Analysand-office scene; wood-paneled, a few fine
leather chairs and a glass-topped desk. Couch.
Hourglass. Chimes. 'I sat down with my analyst
- Dr. Fredric Kerner - for the 71st visit. Oh, yes,
he keeps track, as do I, and he verbally logs each
session. I get to hear myself back whenever he or
I wishes - and the notes he wrote too about each.
Once a week, with three skips in a year. That means
I've been doing this now for near onto a year and a
half! Egads! What dedication!'
-
'This life with you makes me want to be an exhibitionist.'
(Carnival background, calliope noises, a stage set of
carousel horses in motion. A fake full moon hangs
precariously over the scene). 'I walk like a jester
every night, and still you take me down a peg. Is
there nothing more to do? This is too big, this is
too small - my God, how should I feel when that's
about me? Or is it then not. Is there any farther
we can go. Good night, Applewhite. It's all I can
remember, you've beaten me down so.'
-
(Stage goes dark. The pealing of a lone, somber bell
is heard from somewhere off. Repeated. Then, also
from off-stage, comes faintly a siren and another
(clashing) bell) - 'If I've ever attained anything,
it was no attainment at all. Or do I mean otherwise
this - if I've ever achieved anything it was no
achievement at all. Which is the better word
anyway? I'll not know. She was just a heart
from the riverside, probably why I loved her
best. I remember I told her 'I've got my own
story, babe, and I don't need yours.' Really
stupid, that was, now looking back. What a
jerk I could have been. I ain't got no breath
to go it alone. Highways and byways of a
never-ending grace.' (Stage goes silent and
dark...).
-
'Nature invented hunger, we invented bullshit.
He had a good vocabulary, except when he was
talking to someone. A disease-artist, like begging
us to send money to his afflicted children, to care
for them on the Anzo-Borrea Desert border. This
'true-life', I'm finding, is not reducible to words,
either spoken or written, not by anyone, ever.
The true life takes place when we're alone, thinking,
feeling, lost in memory, dreamingly self-aware, in
all those submicroscopic and personal moments -
that are better than all the rest.'
-
'Damnable situations, plebeians routing the horse-farms,
free'd slaves burning down the barns and houses.
Manumission, I think was the word we were taught.
Lincoln maybe freed those slaves, but no one ever
freed Old Abe.' Sliding back in his leather chair,
as the slow lights once again come up, the analyst,
it seems, has fallen asleep - until suddenly an
alarm-clock goes off on the edge of the desk.
'Oh dear. It seems our time this time is over
for good. Or have I myself been dreaming?
How curious, how tiring, how mysterious
now this all is.' The stage goes dark.
Part 2.
I am sitting lazily thinking about what I'd
just heard : the guy going out, he said, to 'have a
cigarette', to which I responded 'no, no, you're
going out to NOT have a cigarette, because when
you get back in here, that cigarette will be gone.
You're really going out to NOT have a cigarette.'
He laughed, although I was dead serious.
(The distant sound of a streetcar is heard,
the little screech and whine of metal, and -
once more - a bell. Bright yellow lights go
up slowly, denoting sunrise, perhaps an
early morning daybreak (same but not).
The loud caw of a morning blackbird is
recurring). 'Ah, another day. Everyone
here seems so willing to get up and go out.
Amazing, how we awake each day to a new
batch of some day's energy. How and why?'
A hand is seen rubbing a neck - long, slender
fingers, a girl's hand, with well-cared for nails.
Two voices, muffled, can be heard nuzzling, as
if heads together. The backdrop here changes -
a woodsy, dark stand of trees, with the sound of
running creek or stream water, over rocks. 'I
love how you looked at me, even when I was fifteen.
You drove me crazy way back when. Little did you
know what that did to my nights.'
-
One time I remember. He played a bunch of
stuff back to me, things I'd said but forgotten I'd said.
I guess. He sat there placid like water, which drove
me crazy. (Lights turn purple, stage darkens, a recorded
voice is heard trying to get past itself speaking).
'Speak to me, something. And I am trying. Shovel
like a plane, one flat surface drying, now bent in a
gutter near where the old churchyard sits, Spiegel &
Vine Aves., I think. And, and yes, I remember the
girl, the girl who came over to me and said 'last
shift of the year for me!' She says to me. She
was really happy. And then, also, I remember
fishing in the ice. I never liked that much -
the doughty fire blowing cinders along the surface.
The attempts to drink coffee where no such
attempts should exist. The black dog barking, outside
of the lighted circle, just barking at the night, at the dark,
one dumb bark after the other. Weird. Long, fire-thrown
shadows moving everywhere. And the other men, with
bottles of brandy in their pants pockets.' (The Doctor,
in shadow, is seen getting up to walk around the desk,
retrieving something, and then lighting his pipe.)
-
He came over to me, I remember, and asked what I knew (?)
and then he said 'have you ever found completion?' and of
course I had no idea what that meant except that it
sounded the equivalent of some frothy insider's talk,
some lawyerly frieze in a barred-off courtroom, so I looked
at him and said 'Well, no. Actually one of the things that
bothered me the most, as I look back now, was the guys
with the booze in their coat pockets - all those bottles and
I could never tell the difference, and still don't know. What's
Scotch against Brandy, what's Rum against either and anyway
what's Whiskey, plain and simple, by itself? And what is it
that men would drink alongside fires on the ice? As a youngster,
what was I witnessing?' (a serving-woman walks in, as the lights
go up a bit - she's carrying a tray of cookies or cake. She wears a
big flouncy house-dress, an Aunt Jemima type head wrap, and speaks
slowly in a (yes) southern drawl : 'Does either of you gents want
some biscuits or cookies? And I've got tea here, or coffee, whichever.'
As she turns about, she places the tray on the desktop, and is
seen slowly walking away - faint music begins playing, Stephen
Foster, Sewanee River, but then stops abruptly as the lights go dark).
-
(Wind blows, and is heard loudly outside the window. A set of
candles now flickers on the desk.) 'I want you now to listen
carefully to me; this is a sheet of notes you gave to me,
if you recall, last year : 'My horror of unbearable things; watch
with me. Come see God in the role of Destroyer. God is horrific,
as Joseph Campbell put it, and I'll buy in. The monster of
horrendous apparition exploding all standards for harmony,
order, and ethical conduct? God in the role of destroyer, that's
all I see; going past all sound judgment, wild, crazed, ancient
and unsatisfiable old ways. A vengeful, forgetful old man -
that's your God! Precisely made crazed by a total effectiveness
producing ineffective, flawed beings. Even I can see now the
exposure God's facing or, well once did anyway. See, now,
God is really dead, and you are made free to fail ! (where
failure's no success at all). Multidimensional and omni-present?
What a crock is that! The real is that which swallows it all,
and it is, as well, the Real which sustains us all.' He seemed shaken,
even for a doctor, as he read this. He went on. 'And then, for whatever
reason, can't remember, we were talking Valerie, you added this -
'Listen to me. Your bedsheets are stained. Your panties are stained,
your drawers are unimpeachably stained forever, and you are
liquid running out, yes! you are liquid running out.' He seemed
agitated by these words. 'I will need to know, now, as we review -
what were you meaning here? What were you trying to say?'
(A noise is heard. The candles blow out. Room, dark).

Part 3. Notes from the record factory : Just because I
wrote it, doesn't mean it's true. Or could that just
as well be - just because it's written, doesn't mean
it's true. Leaving me out of it. Of course. Like a raft
on the blood-red sea, is that body upon it seen alive
or dead, asleep or just resting, floating and drifting,
or floating and drifting with a purpose? And then of
course, if a large fish came abreast of it, could it be
'drifting with a porpoise?' You see the magic?
DO you see the magic in words?
Or anyway, is there?
-
(In some form of fog, the bare lightbulb is shown
alone, is if illuminating a cell. Another distant, bleating
bell drones on, its sound oddly elongated by echo
or something to suggest the 'stretching' of time or
the moment. From the left, in comes, slowly and
with difficulty, a soldier, an old apparition of a
soldier in any case, dressed in Revolutionary War
uniform and rags, tattered and beat. Behind him
can be heard the sounds of fighting and struggle.)
'I'm the last, I'm survived. Just to say I was so
brutally cold, all this time. My feet were both frozen
frozen to black and rags no longer did the work. The
snow along the river, the freezing water, all that. Gunfire,
struggle, fighting and death - all nothing, I don't want to
live it again. I am dead now you understand? I am dead
and yet you see me. Do you want to come to this? Listen.
I tell you now - none of this is going to be worth it. Nothing.'
-
He fades away and the light returns to show the same space
as previous. Kerner still sits. He's looking through a pile of
hand-written papers, the same ones from which he'd just been
reading aloud. He randomly reads out: "'Got nobody but the word
she shielded...self-deception is like the copying of a status given
by one's shadow...the map has many directions, while the legend,
along the bottom, shows but four...all that pleasure, all that pain.'
I can't for the life of me fathom what you were thinking. Do you
wish to go on?" I take a moment, and then respond 'As you like. Of
course I'll go on. You're not fooling me with that feigned reluctance.
This is your method and your whole reason for being here - this office,
your world, your life, your very career. I have more substantial stuff to
stand on than you do - all this professional crap, you're not fooling me.
You'd collapse in a minute if it was taken from you. This is your facade.'
-
'Couldn't dream of dreaming any more. Walked the highway, just
looking forward to something. The old sick Rahway Prison dome
reminded me of death and sickness and control and all bad things.
Even the new white snow couldn't prettify that mess. I thought of all
the people inside there - every qualification of negativity one could
think of, even the guards who, to my knowledge, first-hand, were
equal to or better than any of the inmates in their peculiar perversities.
I've been told stories, accounts by sick drunks behind bars - the other
kind - and straight or drunk it's all the same. Guards are assholes
just like inmates are assholes and no one's every innocent of anything.
It's at the lowest level of society, the mis-education of time and property,
that you get the functional perversion of geeks with unions and all the
job-guarantees that carry them through the day : cops and guards, firemen,
teachers, all the rest of authority - priests and nuns and all that - pure, vested
perversion given a place, put in place, and then paid well. You see, that
soldier guy knew well what was to happen - Capitalism is destruction. It
has to spread, and own everything. It produces its perversion so it can 'own'
it. It peddles sex and advertising, so it can 'own' sex. If it doesn't 'own'
something, it's powerless - so it constantly has to throw all this gross
perversion out at us for reasons of its own power : the drive for control.
It needs to 'own' - as I've said over and over. Authority thus reinforces
the very 'crime' it supposed to be in place to prevent or avoid. That's
what that poor guy was trying to say - you and your fucking illusion
be damned. I got his message perfectly.' (A blazing forest-fire is
here shown, silently, projected on a large back screen. The image,
in silence, remains in place and is seen steadily for a few minutes'
duration. Slowly, the room darkens, and blackness ensues).
-
'So, wouldn't I like to read that there wasn't ever no
sacred harp, no large mountains whereon the Gods
dwelt, no land's edge from which crept great monsters from
out of the sea? Yes, of course, but no, as well. I want everything
all mixed up, see, this life as a long-boiling kettle of things and
possibilities. The wars along the fringes of countries where they
still believe in ancient Gods? Sure! All those Jews and Muslims
fighting it out, while Christians the world over change every belief
they ever had as quickly as Science tells them go! Catholic charnel
houses and bathrooms with glass walls where priests watch nuns
masturbate to liturgical chant? Muslims feasting on the hands of
little children? Women stoned by the crowd, with only their heads
protruding from the ground while the rest of their bodies are straight
down in the hole just dug. Their exposed skull getting battered - to
Death mind you, to Death - by the heaved stones of vicious and
sickening Allah drones? Is that all you want to hear, over and over the
dolloped outpourings, the muck of disgust and disaster? I can serve that
up to you, no problem! (The sound of water, flooding in, is heard. the
Doctor is swept off his feet by the current, and two men in a boat
float swiftly by while fighting that current with their feeble oars.
The lights then come back up, somehow returning us to the
carnival grounds from before. Children are crying on swings).
-
(Lights still up; stage goes clear and on walks the speaker, standing
before the cleared desk of the Doctor. Sitting on one side of the stage
are the Revolutionary War soldier, the Aunt-Jemima style servant, the
guy with the cigarette, Dr. Kerner, and a prison guard type.
The speaker, alone at center, begins reading):
'At the readymades where really there was nothing :
car tires and truck tires piled together, and the countless
juices of whatever slips through as rainwater and grease
and seepage and toil - all of that stuff below filthy windows
through which one could hardly see; and I knew that as I knew
the forcefield that kept it all going - up above the elevated highway,
falling apart and crack-crumbling, where the vehicles flowed like
emanations from Lothar's Evil Kingdom or somesuch drivel by
a rabble-rousing fate. But within myself I felt nonetheless settled
and in one place, where I wanted to be. And the river-wide smokes of a
few fires and factories - the sort of stuff that fouls a river drips its poison
into the water uses the water as a runoff stream of filth and vile -
they curled over the mad Hoboken horizon far across from me
and even though now maybe it's all gone, back then, back here where
I'm speaking of, the Vietnam-killer-force incremental dread and
and all its matter ran on through morning light and afternoon brilliance.
The slow shading of dusk like death towards evening - nothing left but
loud voices and he enchantments of anger : girls in crystal berets
parading from Canal with fatigue-wearing guys as fatigued as their
clothing : weaponry on display and all that mad revolution in the
air going nowhere and the shouts and slogans of idiots countered by
the shouts and slogans of idiots from the other side. I paraded Broadway.
I got dragged to Whitehall. I was tortured and taken in and then
thrown right back out. Incendiary 1967 nighttime daytime unreason
kill-a-cop torture-a-prisoner wipe the slate clean reasoning, the
kind the Government would use to make a point. But without
involvement I walked away from everything unattached and I
cared nothing for the makers nor what it was they made :
train tracks lying in wait, the daily commuters hoarding
their briefcases, time struggling lowly over stairways and
doorways and stepping over whatever in the way could
hinder them. The fine sheeted girls who passed by, looking
for all the world like young mirrors of lovely time, while the
men dragged through their muck carrying both their
own time and the maggot-infested regrets they kept :
slime-ridden memories, military-cap-wearing soldiers, on leave,
playing something, anything, along 42nd street bowling lanes and ski-ball
outlets; walking sideways through the hookers and fags and whores on
display, while cops twirled their sticks and the maddened black-Muslims
hawked their papers and scorched their pavements, and in that
dark December night it always seemed that -
no matter where I was in whatever part of town -
what came to the fore was the Lie that all existence was
NOTHING more than a Lie shading and wrongly filtering
everything we think and do and assume to be,
and all that's left when the final dawn does
finally break is the strange confusing red
sky of another morning just waking to be.'
(Stage goes dark, to silence).
-
'In the long, intangible night of silence which I undergo
there is nothing ever that brings me back to face the true
reality, or what it is, at least, said to be.' The Doctor is
sitting by the desk. He speaks 'That's complete nonsense and
you really must think - where have you been and what have you
done to warrant these types of feelings about yourself and onto
yourself. It's not clear to me that you're not yet simply striving
for a greater acceptance.' This sort of sparring seems to go on
often enough, and I'm never sure by it if he's really trying to
tell me something in a professional manner or just squirming with
the idea that he feels, instead, that he has to have something to say.
If that's the case, of course, it makes a mockery of his entire and
professed reason for professional being.
-
(Darkness remains on stage. No lights, no sound. Carrying
a lit candle, a form enters from right, muttering and talking
to, apparently, only itself. Wearing the robes of an ermine-clad
King, apparently crazed, the figure stalks about, muttering and
stammering. 'Form, matter and meaning. Oh, no, nothing of it.
Why am I here walking about in this strange darkness? Alone,
yet I feel so many things, as if a crowd myself. Oh gibber, oh my!
Maddening all this is and, yes, yet, no had I been born a pauper
would I feel these same things? So dark, so needless. What's the
why and why's the what? Need help! Need help! Can't be saved!').
-
Sometimes it just got like that : we'd talk past each other, seemingly,
both intent on getting across some pre-determined point and, in
doing so, never really listening to the other's words. 'A mechanism
in place of an organism' - I'd found that one day in a book I was
reading, and it was from a letter written by Neal Cassady to Allen
Ginsberg, and I mentioned it to no real avail, even though Kerner
dd ask me to bring it back whole the next time I came, which I did:
'Scientific psychology has worked out for itself a complete system
of images in which it moves with entire conviction. The individual
pronouncements of every individual psychologist proves on
examination to be merely a variation of this system, comfortable
to the style of their world science of the day...like everything else
that is no longer becoming but become, it has put mechanism in
the place of organism.' Well he didn't think to much of it, but why
would he? It was in fact targeting his very operational outlook. It
took full aim at his school of thought, all these psychologist and sit-down
psychiatry people going about their business. To me, however, it did
then and does now make perfect sense - and in fact seems to have a
nice grasp on the matter. Yes, things go dead, become static, once
established. Just as any revolution, after the revolution, is by
definition in real trouble, so too the vibrant and swelling school(s)
of psychological thought and procedure has stultified into frozen
patterns and sects of their own, places from which each participant
(doctor, psychologist, psychiatrist, social worker) carefully operated -
in a strict and laborious adherence to their chosen field of reference
and sect. No further magics sought or included. I understood all that.
It was perfectly clear to me. Why the good Doctor Kerner could not
was clear and understandable to me. 'Defensive mechanism', let's say.
-

And oh by such provincial thoughts did I get by - reading about Indian
occupations of 1964, Alcatraz's first invasion, the budding movements, the
expansion of federal grip - all of those things just then slowly started :
(a curtain comes up, with music playing, broad, sweeping music, while a
travel-film plays - vistas, crops waving golden in the sunlight, in the
distance hills and mountains, rivers and streams, a few cabins along the
wooded edges. The voiceover intones Robert Frost and Robert Service,
words about great places and sensitive lands - 'we were the land's before the
land was ours' and all that. The scene shifts then quickly to rice-paddy
Vietnam scenes, rapid machine-gun fire and the rotor-slap-whine of
three in-formation Huey helicoptors coming in) : 'This is all I have to offer,
America! The sewage of Europe does not flow through these veins.'

-
Doctor speaks : 'Your nice little vignette is very nice indeed, and - oh by the
way - you've got that Frost quote exactly reversed, do you know that?
It's actually 'before the land was ours, we were the land's' and I do
hope that would make some form of a difference to you in this telling. No?
Then no, OK. I guess that's alright with me as well. Frankly, I wouldn't care.'
-
A roiling rainstorm is heard outside, the lights flicker.
'I visited the quarries outside my hometown. The digs still
go on, almost in secret they pile drive and blast the nearby
hills and in so disfiguring them they truck away countless tons
of earth rock. It's gets chopped and peppered into all sorts
of various sizes of landscape rock and the usual stupid-size
boulders you see placed around parking lots and architectured
office buildings. Supposed to add genteel charm and class
to the surroundings. It's all garbage, but no one cares. When I was
young, it used to make me sad to sit and watch from a distance at
all this work - ripping the earth for nothing so much as another form
of human junk. I'd sit in secret places, unseen, through holes in the
off-limits fences, and just watch. Sometimes with others, but they
all thought it was fun, an adventure for kids. I saw differently. It's
the entrapment of the human spirit in the activity of destruction
and clamor - the complete opposite of why we're placed here, to
safeguard and husband the land and places around us. But no one
ever cared. If the morons ever reached Heaven, they'd blast right
through it so see what they could use. Is that the human spirit? Is
that the essence of life? I hope not, and if it is - if this quizzical,
mechanical curiosity is to be counted as a plus, then count me out.
I want nothing to do with that. Additionally, if it's your domain, and
the one you're defending, then screw you and screw your silly
profession. You're sitting here trying to delve my feelings, and
in turn disprove my sensitivities because they don't fit your
patterned narrative. Forward motion. Progress. Advancement.
All that.'

Part 4One time I really did have to ask the doctor how to make a part, a 'section',
how to, what I meant, 'separate' the sections and he said 'Just keep on going
like this, you're doing fine.' You see, he had been having me turn in to him
each time whatever pages I could write during the intervening week which
would touch upon things we'd been or would be talking about. He really had
no idea about how simple that was for me (since I'd always been doing that
anyway
, unbeknownst of course to him), and I'd surprised him both
with my regularity of writing and with the length and volume of it. But, I
always did think that was one of the faults or stupidities of any of this
'therapy' stuff - the notion that someone outside of you yourself is able to
sit in judgment of the 'you' of you merely by observing and listening, from
'outside', to what 'you' say about yourself. There are too many intervening
concepts involved to make that really work, and besides that it's really
all conjectural and cerebral anyway. There are too many assumptions
underway at any one time to make it work. Like, what is the 'you' of 'you'
which is supposed to be getting examined anyway? And who is this rather
presumptuous professional fool who assumes the rule of self-law so
as to represent the 'judgment' over which you yourself then are to show
some form of allegiance? And what is 'judgment' from outside anyway (and,
Jesus, has not all Mankind already had enough of that crap all these years
over?), and what is allegience. And when I talk about something,
when I say 'water' or 'glass' or 'doubt' or' fear' or any of that, how am
I sure he means the same thing that I mean by referring to the concept
I'm meaning? It's all fakery anyway - he's involved in some ridiculous
form of false pride and professional lordship over an assumed underling as
myself, and I, in turn, look at him as a mere representative of an entire adult
and professional world and culture and worldview and even 'religion' which
has done nothing but screw up reality all these long years anyway. So, I
went, I guess, along for the ride and had a hard time not smirking,
not being arrogant, not throwing the saddle over the log-fence and forcing
his ass to ride instead of mine. I mean, let's really look at all this.
Let's, really. (Light cuts to bright yellow, with ominous music
welling up as scene changes to a medical table with drills, saws, knives
and medical apparatus. Scene fades away, stage goes momentarily dark).
-
'I am not a carnivore no not at all though there are moments my
crazed hunger for meat and animal flesh leads me to kill stalk and
pester and what do you think of that?' (Crazed noble doctor stands up and
declaims 'a part of me, sincere, wants to see you as crazy and past the
safe edge but another part - the twinkling part the part with interests
everywhere - keeps me right here to merely listen - you see stupendous
things as you are trite and dangerous at the same time.
Quite the intrigue this is, to keep me here.') ...
-
We see the stage open to a daylight scene,
a small general store, simply lit, with candy and small goods arrayed and
a small boy reaching up for penny candies, a handful. The boy says 'I have
to get a newspaper for my Father, 5 cents, The Daily News, he wants to
read the baseball notes, like he does every day.' The clerk reaches over the
boy and grabs a paper; giving it to him he says 'Tell your Dad I said hello;
boy that Maris and Mantle together they are some team right!'. The
boy nods and quickly goes off. The scene darkens. A voice is heard:
'That was me, for my routine, I'd do that all Summer long back then.
'Dad had no work, it must have been 1960, '61, I can't remember. All
we did all Summer was look at baseball and scores, and then I'd run off
with the kids and we'd play more baseball down at the school yard; block
against block, different groups of kids stupidly vying against one another
for no real reason - just like in the Winter, with snowball fights block
against block - though they were really different, more like warfare,
we'd slaughter and maim and really go nuts with the ice and snow. It was
perfect, like having a murder weapon that no one could trace, it would all
melt away, the icicle you maimed with, just melting away.'
-
'Are you sure you recall the things you are saying, or have they been
added afterward, based on your life experiences since?' I was
flabbergasted just in the hearing of that question. 'I can't believe you're
going to sit there and tell me this.' I wanted to go on and tell him
lots of other things, but at that moment I was too beside myself to
argue correctly about anything. (A bell rings twice. Lights remain on once
again; thin, weak yellow, but steady light). Speaker walks front, center :
'I have determined this to be a self-perfecting reality, one that we are engaged
in constantly by the simple fact (not simple at all of course) of our creating,
each moment, the reality-progression we seek : self-healing skin, a cocoon
around us both pliable and strong enough, holding in everything needed
and, at the same time, able to regenerate and repair itself in due and
ample time, mostly unbeknownst to us - all this working and changing and
healing, the substance of our own presence, the fabric which holds us.
Consciousness does not precisely take this in, so that we are for the
most part unaware at any one time of this substance being and occurring.
That is but one of the 'magics' of this life - an illusionary passage through
structured totality which is completely unstructured until we make it so,
or bring it forth, by cooperating with it. Even if so unconsciously. It blossoms
invisibly as the flower blossoms from bud to bloom.' (By this point, they are
both sitting separately on simple, hardback wooden chairs placed alongside
each other at center stage. The speaker continues...).

Part 5-Recitatif-

-(Annihilating all that's made : a green thought in a green shade.)-

'The horror of unbearable things is that one comes to see God as Destroyer,
in the roll of some horrific force out to avenge, in the most petty way, codes
not enforced, or crazed, psychotic rules not followed. Why would this be so
except that - as a tribal, war God - in its earliest attributions this is how
that concept had first been visualized by Man on Earth; followed later, of
course, by a completely different and more societal version of a civilized
'God' much more serene and orderly, far less rapacious, far more comforting
and sorrowful. Instead of the old warrior/avenger God crazily going after
rules of Its own making, we have the other extreme, the sacrificial-lamb
God, laid back and comforting, who has - supposedly, in this narrative -
given back of Itself to the benefit and Mankind (and then of course, just
as mysteriously disappearing from the affairs of Man, having been curiously
supplanted by Powers of more secular and temporal natures with their own
boffo and curious claims to things : Kingship, Rights of Kings, Royal Lineages,
Fiefdoms and governmental forces and decrees replete with all the trappings
of power and enforced the limitations of Religion). Don't you see, Herr Doktor,
how it is all THAT which is truly crazy and out of order? Men being asked to
sacrifice their lives for endless layers of conditional bullshit?'
-
'I wouldn't want to break you, send a fist right to your face, a brutal boot
deep into your ass, but very often it occurs that these things become
necessary and the only way by which to impart not the values themselves
but the way in which they are being violated to the mind of another. It
a very direct way of experiencing the task at hand; something like 'do or
die' and, don't get me wrong, again those old, tradeworn cliches do manage
to give us a form of the manner in which old thinking once operated : the
force of the cannon shed, the power of the assaultive indictment, the force
of absolute and final result, and I use them only as example, for these
are more exalted times and we live with different brains now and a
consciousness totally transformed. I cannot tell you how it breathes,
but perhaps your gloried 'scientists' can.'
-
A screen behind them begins projecting a noisy, almost riotous, crowded
bar scene; the two turn about, entranced, to view it, without speaking.
Viewing the projection, they listen to all the noise and bustle and song:
-
'Who remembers where we're going?'
'Chocolate broom? Paulette wanted to beat it...with a broom, but
who said what about chocolate? She wanted to beat all things,
even those impaired; false idols and the saints at their grottos.'
-
'The imperfections of man are such that I could probably
understand; even those guys back at McGovern's in Newark,
remember those assholes, sitting in their union meeting room at
the back, all kingly and shit, 30 men all nursing their beer? A real
falsetto contingent of gangsters, they was, sitting around pounding down
the swill all the while thinking of all that they have and still wanting more :
money and dues and each other's wives and pathetic second homes at
the Jersey shore where their filthy sons and daughters hang out.'
'Hey, hey, you know that little dead-end street Eddie lives on? I
just found out all his neighbors call him the Japanese Landlord, but
nobody knows why! What the Hell's with that?
......(end of Act One).....
--
ACT TWO

Stage opens on emptiness, with a few bare lightbulbs shining
on the bare, wood floor. A few people scurry around and leave,
and an Italian man, using a broom along the floor, begins to talk
of his earliest days as a youth, coming to America. A simple,
old European music plays in the background, soothing yet

morose, carnivalesque, yet dour..... 'Gone then to America so
as to be a crook, the big American kind, the kind of crook
that's a hoodlum big enough to take a ferry boat and run it
and then own it and then own ten and then control the
ferry service all around and then own as well all the booze
to serve and all the women to bite to boot -
that's where I always said I was going and that's where I
got and that's where I am and that's the ghost as well of
Giovanni Malicendo known to you as John Maylicint
Fairweather III, if you don't mind, himself reporting
back to all of you somehow on all of what's occurred and
I'm going to live some days in a bawdy house the kind
with curtains and windows and the women who cook and
clean and sew and do all the rest too and they sing all the time
and I'm coming to America just like I said just to do those things
and see the big money and the statues on the wharves and the
military guards who stand in the harbor watching - for submarines
and fire-boats and puffs of deep-sea smoke the monsters rising
up from the old and ancient and European oceans - no more
of the old stuff for me and I'm taking a field-house maybe
in a watery Mountainville cabin where I'm going to live
on a farm or then maybe a sea-shanty shack along the old
Jersey shore with an open sand-pit front and a fire-pot out
back and I'm going to live for all the tar and strangeness in
the world to find me - those midnight fires on the beach
of stone or the mountain walkways and a hilltop home and
just like the American says 'I choose' this place this day
this freedom this space and all its wide and open happiness
wherever it is found and anyway I'm going to America for that.

-

Set goes dark, a quiet music plays in the 
background over a dimly, half-lit stage. 
These voices are heard, with the title '(Perambulator)':
'I've found the very best spot to be,' the man said, idly sitting down,
'next to the barrier, next to the Plunkett tree. And I've meant every word
I've ever said, and just as well, too.' I myself had walked over from
Lance Grove, just to wonder about things  - how'd I ever get in this 
location, what is all this infernal noise and words, ever, everyday
and always. Mexican midgets and their leaf-blowing trees, these
killers crawl on their hands and knees, cutting things and trimming with
noise while they know not a thing. That  yapping tongue, that laughter,
all that need and use. Like the landing of an alien nation. "Yep, seems
they're immune to all that they ruin  -  they don't know the land yet
they come here to wreck it.' It was the comfy-man again, talking wildly
now and reading my thoughts. Speaking to me. 'I've been in places where
they'd be jailed.  Cutting the King's tree is a crime, trimming on his land,
poaching his stand. Truly traumatic,  y'understand? If these bastards
only knew; they'd run and hide. I was actually an  executioner
once  -  they'd never even be tried, just cut and parceled and killed 
by a lance. King John never cared. They wouldn't have a chance.'  I
located his image in my chamber of horrors glass  -  it was old
old Malcolm Furit and it was (as well) 1218. These were
actually people he'd really have seen. 'I sit down gratuitously and I 
hear your tale,' I said. 'I'm nodding and listening, and then
I realize  -  once again  -  I've crossed that little cone barrier past
where I've seen your face, and entered your visit and
entered your space.' A spat of silence followed, then this - 'Well, yes, 
yes, your multi-dimensional aspects once more have come to the
fore  -  sit back now with me and let's watch,
and I'll talk as you listen....all this, you understand, goes on at
once, concurrent, with no real time or sequence. That's all false,
you see.  Time has no limits and just runs on. It is not fixed,
not a 'set commodity', you see. It changes its own perception,
elongates, and doubles back. But anyway, it isn't really 'Time'  - 
what you call it  -  it just is its own limiting presence,
something that goes with all the others, takes its pride 
 in blending in. You read it as a line, but it's more like a wave.
And it brings us to this pass; another place, indeed.  But lo!
We can talk here at least. We swim through it, we speak it,
we dream it, and - move along - let us watch - for we are, you see,
both the actors within the play while yet, the writers of all we say.
Remarkable moments,  all these. And look - from what lineage
does this gardener girl come? Her father was a mountain man, her 
mother baked cakes. Her brother, in fact, right now, is a lighting
engineer  -  just goes to show. She wheedles the loves of leaves
and flowers with those two quite tidy hands. Takes care of these
lands. I often sit and watch her, why just to sit and watch  -  all the
makings of a talisman, here to stay. Just as quickly,
then, it all disappeared."
..END of that piece ('How I'd begun Writing Drama').  end of chapter 69.

70. Some time about 1969, deep Winter night, The Studio School had as a 'guest' speaker Buckminster Fuller. Dymaxion Car. Geodesic Dome. A few other gadfly-type ideas that society never could take seriously. I attended this, and brought a few other people in too  -  this was at the same time as the Twin Towers were going up, seriously up, and the International Travelall vehicle we were driving in had its rear differential broken on one of the rutted and temporary wooden-beam trucks roadways which twisted through the ten or twelve blocks of the construction site   -   all temporary barriers and barricades, detours and side rails. It was pretty messy. We weren't aware of the extent of damages  -  the car continued running OK  -  until the next morning when we realized a prodigious leak from the rear differential/axle area.  Fuller's talk was pretty interesting, well-attended, informative and all that. Fact is, I do not readily recall much of it all these years later. I recall vividly the scenes of the construction site, the stops and detours we made (having wheels in the city right then was very neat), the activities in the Village where we hung out. We also  -  I gave  -  took a deep tour of the Studio School as old Whitney Mansion  -  basement levels and all that cellar stuff, the old shelves the catacombs an all that odd but beautiful colored paper left around.  I had a guy with me that night, Jack Manick, who was sompletely bowled over by my 'tour' of those old buildings, given to him and the others. I took them down into the catacomb-basement areas where i basiccally lived and haubted, and they were amazed. Later that evening, Buckminster Fuller came and went. I recall him being a rather bland guy, not really a spark at all, almost a scientific type, humorless, like a business person or an insurance guy. Something anyway. He certainly didn't bowl me over. Actually, it had always been my way to lose interest and connection to someone like him  -  someone who represented a scientific and deliberate approach to things, facts, conclusions, etc. School had been filled with those sorts  -  administrators pushing rules, teachers yapping about the 'truth' of things, with all their superior airs and faux wisdom. This guy, as I recall, wore a thick tweedy gray suit and even a bowtie! He pointed to things like lines and figures, and talked 'potential' and 'percentage' while already inhabiting a world of some form of conservation and economy, world consciousness, and an internationalism of means. It all lost me, and was lost on me as well  -  it wasn't magic, wasn't art or spark. Perhaps to some, but not me.  One of Fuller's big things to me, probably to me alone, was his verbalized idea of 'God', his God, being a verb and not a noun.  The first time I had heard that, I was floored, struck by its import and meaning. I loved it, I bought in. After some time, I hear it in a few more references and was struck anew each use. Looking up to follow the idea, I once found : "The center of Jewish religious experience is, in fact, the God who is unfolding, who is in the process of becoming. That is what we worship...A central lesson of the Torah is that God is present in every place, in every moment in all the world, above us and beside us.

I'd long before been thinking on this  -  activism within the world  -  trying to figure out what the best ways were to achieve it and, even moreso, how to personify it. This seemed, in that instant, to do it for me. The 'God as a verb' thing did it  -  which is pretty much why I ever cared about Fuller in the first place. The rest of any of it you could chuck  -  cars, design, new forms of housing and living, the domes, geodesity. All blather and science. It never made much sense except in the intangible sense of reasoning. I even liked the idea of a God saying he was to be called  the equivalent of 'Whatever'. I liked it. It took the air out of so much of the flim-flam and the pretense which so drove the world forward  -  smoke and mirrors had nothing on it. Looking back on it all now, it was nothing more outlandish than was the rear-end of a 1959 Chevrolet  -  a crazy, overblown and bizarre idea which everyone just accepted and took for granted. If I close  my eyes right now, and think back to those days, that's what I see  -  a  bizarre agglomeration of words and a world all resembling the hundreds of back ends of '59 Chevies parked one next to the other  truth, as it was once to be represented. That was a 'fixed' God, in-place, structured, and running things. I had another, fluid and running, idea of things, one which I was determined to be carrying out.

The whole idea of R. Buckminster Fuller was, back then, pretty novel. He always reminded me of C. Wright Mills anyway, Mills racing to and from Greenwich village on his BMW motorcycle in the 1950's, while writing and working on his books like 'The Lonely Crowd' and 'Organization Man'. That sort of stuff, I loved. Inside grizzle that got to the center of what lives other people were living, or thought they were living. It all opened up a whole raft of 'social-work' ideas for me  -  social-working being, back then, one of those gauzy areas where the social scientist had begun making careers and livlihoods for hundreds of thousands of people who started grubbing off government funds to make their livings  -  all those case workers and poverty survey people. Lillian Wald on steroids. It all did turn to shit soon enough, but there was a brief glimmer, in the early 1950's, sort-of a post-war, post-Depression blast of new energy, when it all could have gone right. As to Fuller, (never found out about that 'R' fronting his name), he for me became an offshoot of that  -  some weirdly, curious anti-TV assemblage of a weirder America existing beneath the current. What he was ever doing at The Studio School, as a matter of fact, was beyond me : I saw him as representing 'Engineering' not 'Art' and never the two were to be crossed. Engineering, anyway, was more Cooper union style, a few blocks east. I guess that was disproved later on anyway. He'd invented, in the 1930's this car, called the 'Dymaxion' (see below):

Dymaxion Car (you can look it up/find a photo0

The Dymaxion car was designed by R. Buckminster Fuller in the early 1930s. The car featured highly innovative, and ultimately influential, features compared with the common car of the day including: a three wheel design with rear wheel steering and front wheel drive, a longer body (20 feet), and a highly aerodynamic design. Success of the design was realized in its performance efficiencies: the car could transport up to 11 passengers, reach speeds of up to 90 miles per hour, and ran 30 miles per gallon.
........................... That was pretty odd in and of itself, and it all certainly took the brain of an engineer, not an artist. Yet, there's a place where this overlapped too  -  I found something of William Blake in him, all those pithy little aphorisms and mottos, the idea, like Blake, of ingenuity, studying something and then making something else (etching/engineering), design to accompany vision, so to speak. He'd had hundreds of comments and statements gathered and published. I read as much as I could  -  some were interesting, way more than others : 'Dare to be naive.'; 'In order to change an existing paradigm you do not struggle to try and change the problematic model. You create a new model and make the old one obsolete.' How like Ezra Pound's 'Make it new!' is that? The most famous one, I'd suppose, was always 'I'm just a passenger on the spaceship Earth'  -  from which Stewart Brand then picked up the shtetl-ball and went running, after which all his 'NAIVE' followers clamored up the same mountain.

So, I was lost amidst everything  -  following a star. Using the word 'lost' here is relative, and painful too. I was not 'lost' in the sense meaning useless and without direction. Rather, I was lost within the great world of the Past, which world a worshipped, as opposed to the shoddy and disreputable world, right then, of the 'present' which I saw continually trying to close in around me. it eats you up, if it can, the present. It doesn't allow remnants to live on; fighting all continuation, the 'Present' is a monster wanting a clean sweep. I knew that and I declared my intent to keep it away from me. What value could it have? I'd already seen destruction  -  paddle boats full of it, places, forests, woods, minds, people, lands, stories, nations and all the rest, just gobbled up and obliterated, spit out like yesterday's goo. I knew I could beat it. I knew I was  -  as well  -  ready for the fight. And I found no one ready to talk for the other side  -  that voracious pumice of black death called the Present. The Present was already getting set up to produce the Future  -  oddly enough, which is where we are now. Do you know why? Because it's all created in the mind  -  every thread leads to the next, killing off creativity and washing down the real flavors of goodness and wonder. The world grows dull and weary now. Just looking at it hurts. No one ever really took the proverbial 'bull' by the proverbial 'horns' and twist-snapped its God-forsaken neck. Talk about worshipping Baal and all that 'Golden Calf' stuff. Shit, the world lives it.


Buckminster Fuller did have a way of going on. He spoke at length, running off, intensely absorbed in what he was presenting. I found a certain pride of proof in just being there, regardless of what I retained. All these years later, it's really only what I look up about him and read to see that makes any sense. Surface tensile rigidity, the mass and preponderance of he idea of geodesic, all that exists, but just is nothing I really care about. Funny thing was, a few years later Elmira College itself, switching over from female-only to a co-ed format, males accepted, built a 3-geodesic dome sports complex at their satellite campus, about 10 miles from Elmira, in Horseheads, NY, in order to 'attract' the male student input they sought  -  somehow thinking that sports and indoor ice-hockey was he way to do it. Buckminster Fuller was never really 'mentioned', but this cutting-edge use of his ideas  -  strange looking and startling  -  became the Elmira College Sports Complex, referred to as 'The Domes', though actually it is the 'Murray Athletic Complex.' It seemed unsavory then, and still does, but, whatever  -  the use of these 'domes' for athletics is probably what makes them so unsettling, more than the 'domes' themselves. All the cinder-block and concrete inside, beneath the exterior, quite ordinary, aloof, cold and damp/moist, from sports and ice and dampness. It just never seemed to work well. I suppose a man, an inventor, however you'd refer to it, loses a good part of control over the idea he or she has developed once it's out there publicly, for use and refinement. Supposedly, the strength and the free-support standings of these domes will live forever, maybe as an idea, but I'm not sure as a physical complex. Things have a way of just falling apart. Good ideas turn bad over time.



Fuller's Dymaxion car thing  -  the entirety of it all  -  had a long life. It was strange how it must have occurred to him  -  a big, blob of a car, three wheels instead of four, 30 miles per gallon, one-hundred miles per hour attainable, all as if he'd somehow been able tap all the attributes of some idea of 'future-car' back in the 1930's. How it all went, I really don't know  -  production facilities, paint shop., etc. I don't even know how many were produced; and I think he had some sort of Dymaxion houses going too.  The funniest thing was that the night of attending his lecture/talk, as I stated, the Travelall in which we were bouncing around NYC broke its rear-end, so to speak. A Travelall, back then, was something akin to a Jeep wagon  -  a large, lumbering Land-Rover sort of vehicle, made by the tractor people, International Harvester. Fine choice for a rough city vehicle. The roads in the downtown area we frolic-drove in all night were actually once regular streets, except that the entire area (once a predominantly Lebanese and Middle Eastern section of lower Manhattan) had all been displaced and torn up, and down, for the World Trade Center Twin Towers. The construction project was huge, and it took at least six years of heavy activity  -  temporary construction gullies, wooden ramps, huge mud holes, rutted, beaten trenches. We bounced and raged around all night  -  the waterfront back then was still all accessible and mostly barren and open  -  sand pits, truck docks, wasted areas, all neglected. They'd pretty much destroyed what had been an area of Lebanese immigrants and rows of electronic stores  -  radios, vacuum tubes, repair shops, TV shops, all that. Just as had been done in west-midtown, in the years of Lincoln Center's construction  -  displacing the area once known as San Juan Hill  -  thousands of Puerto Ricans and Hispanic immigrants just moved out. No one cared much, especially here, downtown  - all the powers in place had made sure their steamroller would run through everything. The people of San Juan Hill at least had West Side Story filmed there, among the  ruins. Others got nothing at all. There's a great photography book, still around, still available, by a guy named Danny Lyons  -  he photographed lots of things back then, simple, eccentric, charming black and white photos, no conscious 'art' stuff, just great shots  -  of this old, abandoned, derelict, and 'in the midst of teardown', shots of this entire district, all taken as it happened.  Check it out perhaps; well worth it.



There's a way of turning the world around as you live within the world  -  people do it all the time. Here, in that miserable confine of a changing financial district in 1968 and the years following, they were doing it anew and they weren't really even aware of it. At the more spiteful level of engineering, construction and design, yes, of course they were aware : that was Fuller's domain, sort of. Yet, what consciousness really is, undergirding all the rest of Life and Experience, is the transformation of things. Consciousness fully changes the world, re-edits its meanings and baggage. People go to sleep one way and, some time later, they find that they've awakened in another way entirely. It was like that when, for instance, all those silly and stupid public figures, in the earlier sixties, realized that youth culture and the society around it had overwhelmed the lazier mentality of the 50's and even the Kennedy era. There was something new in the air and those people realized they'd need either to get on it or be lost  -  so have all those faux-hipster slimeballs turning over a new leaf on the morrow  -  sideburns, Nehru Jackets, boots and new haircuts all of a sudden begin showing up, ridiculously too, on the likes of Andy Williams and Sammy Davis Jr., Jerry Lewis grows a beard. Everyone is hip, cracking sex jokes and double entendres, living the 'Laugh-In' life of quick-cut stupid humor, aware of themselves at each turn, riding the crest, going public, switching allegiances. Of course, the entire society fell apart  -  the war effort was finally picked apart for the crap it was, The idea of schooling and rigidity and society's mores and mothers and manners too fell away. 'You've got breasts, well then, God-damn it, let's show 'em.' That's how low to the effect of getting under the ribbon, lessening ground clearance, all things got. Manson murders and political murders. Madness in front of the screen and behind it. Fast, quick, undiluted, and un-examined too. The entire edifice crumbling away  -  what slowly arises anew is another horizon, another glimmer of what could be. I think, by that time of this last talk, the likes of people like Buckminster Fuller were over. He went pretty much unheard after that  -  he represented something other, the old, the elder, the traditional, the more strict form of logic and learning. About these days too, I remember, it took Harry Truman like a hundred days to die  -  each morning some radio geek would, upon reading the text, have some form of 'lying in bed while dying' report on Truman's condition. I used to imagine that the reason it took him so long to die was because, one by one, before he could die, his spiritual affinity had to meet, one by one, in some strange ether of the portal to the 'other' world, each one of the people torched by the two atomic bombs. A stupid idea, yes, but that was my idea in' 72, or whenever it was. Made no sense, but so what  -  by contrast, Hitler died in an instant, disproving my case. I had this example at hand, and I was determined to lead by it. In fact, as I recall, Eisenhower took a long time to die as well. Those years were all swallowed up by these weird political echoes of nothingness  -  Nixon and Johnson, two stupid, nasty, tumbling bears in a ring of no dimensions and no perimeter. Ho Chi Minh and DeGaulle, Stalin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev, Willy Brandt, U Thant, Kenyatta, Nasser, Ben Gurion, Golda Meir, Dubceck, it just went on and on, covering decades. Madness and eccentricity, at the very time of a crazed, crumbling world. Truly, by 1975, it had all fallen apart and had to be slowly picked up again and put back together, somehow, into something. No semblance. No model except the model of 'do it again' sameness. Buckminster Fuller went out with that wind. Just like Bertrand Russell did.

The Electronics District was gone  -  that same new wind that had swept in had killed it. The resultant edifices of two coarse, bare, ugly Twin Towers resembled nothing to me so much as the streamlined looks of Emerson 12-transistor radios, a big vogue in the early sixties  -  hand-held, miniaturized and transistorized. Small radios for everyone. I remember one time I saw a guy walking with a radio in hand, near to his ear but still hand-held and public, just listening as he walked. You'd see that often enough  -  another time, oddly, I can recall the fellow who later became my brother-in-law doing that, listening each day in that walking manner, for some reason, to Dr. Joyce Brothers' radio talk-show on some AM station. Bizarre behavior. I asked why? He shrugged and said to me, even more incredibly, 'if they could just get rid of the time and the news announcements, this would be a great thing.' Whatever that meant. These Twin Towers were nothing if not brutal  -  some Japanese architect, Yamasaki or something  -  a relatively small-time name actually, had been selected for the design process. He'd built one or two smaller variants of this design elsewhere around the world. He had a reputation of sorts already. This was a gamble  - the height, the rigidity, the interior chambers, the mixed use, the plaza-plan, the hidden infrastructure, the location, the subsoil, all that stuff was important, precise and incredibly variable here, and different. Nonetheless the towers went up  -  it took a long time. It reduced that southwest corner of Manhattan Island to a no-man's land for years, but it got done. It was what it was, as is said. Untested. Tall. Stark. Two of them, in fact. It was always said that New York City was so great they had to name it twice ('New York, New York') in the address. In the same vein, these things were so tough they had to build them twice, adjacent, side-by-side, twinned and paired forever. Even in the falling. Even as they crumbled.

It's sort of like you first envision the world and then you make it. Solipsism perhaps. It can't be the same for everyone, or can it? When you say yellow, I see yellow. Are we both seeing what you say? When you feel pain, I understand pain; but is it the same. Who knows? All that crazy, blind stuff leads everything astray  - the world was envisioned anew and the resultant environment is the one we lived with. Lower Manhattan eventually got fixed up, turned to rot, changed over again, transformed, then got slammed again, and is now once more undergoing a renewal. People forget, things change. the canyons and roads of those old days are long gone. More vivid than anything else, however, are the memories. I know they're there, and I know that place still exists  -  you can take your God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost stuff and shove it. Put it right beside my memories, and I'll discuss what's more real. Another time once some guy was telling me about the World Trade Center, Twin Towers, as they were being built  -  his friend was a truck driver from Hoboken, and to and from Bethlehem Pennsylvania he drove, each day, maybe two trips if possible with traffic and waiting. He drove a large flatbed, oversized vehicle, and he'd get to the steel mill in Bethlehem, PA and pick up one, or a few, I forget, enormous steel beams for use in the superstructure of the Twin Towers. This guy said his friend (he referred to him as 'Petey Bananas', his nickname from having the first and last name of 'Peter Bonnano') would get the truck loaded at the Bethlehem Steel Mill with beams that were still warm  -  not hot I guess, just 'warm'  -  from the pouring, and that they'd still be warm a few hours later upon arrival. A pretty striking image, even if untrue (I never knew if I was just being bullshitted), this idea of the freshly poured beams being loaded and used; all those hot rivets flying as well?
 
['Everything you've learned in school as 'obvious' becomes less and less obvious as you begin to study the universe. For example, there are no solids in the universe. There's not even a suggestion of a solid. There are no absolute continuums. There are no surfaces. There are no straight lines.']...R.B.F.
Had I ever awakened on Inman Avenue, at any time point in the time I lived there, any of this discovery and thinking would have been lost. It would have been washed sway, forced off me, by the pressure of the great stupidities which prevailed there. Just the unquestioning assumptions by which people lived all things; all simple and good enough for nothing more than ruining most lives. I realized I had learned another language, and it made it difficult to go back to that foreign land of 'home' and try to begin anew. Didn't wish to, so just never did. Like a distinct 'Grammar' which is forced into your head by stupid and dense English teachers filled with and peddling their rubbish, my view was separate and far different  -  my grammar was quite legible and literate to me. It involved few of the rules by which 'sentences' are made up and put together. You could diagram or parse one of my sentences, I made sure, and be led far, far afield from where you'd 'thought' you'd be going. That's exactly what I wanted and that's how I planned my life.

71. My Uncle Walter, from Germany, about 1956 or '57, had purchased a parcel of land in the northern hills of NJ  -  wooded land, with a small, twisty dirt road leading up to it along which one or two other huts or country homes. It was magnificent, his idea. I don't know much else of it  -  what it cost, how he'd arranged it, what his precise plans were, but I knew I loved it. They lived in Union City, NJ, at that time  -  an apartment with a grand view  -  of midtown New York. I was just as equally captivated by that, and oftentimes from that Union City between-the-buildings sights of its streets. It all seemed as massive and close as to touch. And then, on that plot of country land, atop a hill, in West Milford, NJ, he proceeded to build a home. With the building of that house my Uncle Walter presented me, at about age 9, the first direct approach to deliberate thinking. My Aunt Mae, his wife, my father's sister, always said things like 'He had his mind set, he loved that place -  it was a hilltop after a long, unpaved driveway road. I was always getting stuck in the snow, skidding up or down, having trouble driving in and out  -  we had to drive each day, remember, some forty miles to work. It was no picnic. I loved the house, but the place, we just had to after a few years, let it go.' (They did. Some years later they were back in an even nicer house, to me, in Rutherford or Lyndhurst, whichever. The borders crossed right there and you could simply walk from one to the other of those two towns beneath the rail overpass). My aunt and uncle both worked at the Bendix plant, Hackensack or somewhere, and that's really all I know. I was not aware of their work/jobs, don't really know what they did, etc. I just know that, right near there too, next to the Bendix plant, was a famed little diner, often now seen in any of those 'Diners of Note' books  -  quaint, small, cut, old. The Bendix Diner. She told me they would often take their lunch there. For many years my Uncle Walter kept  strange, small, totally rugged and reliable mid-size FIAT, upon which he doted. it wasn't one of the small ones, Topolino, or 500 or whatever the famous one was, but a larger, 4-door sedan. Evidently quite reliable. He had it well into the 1970's, as I recall, still equipped and running well. The other car was always something in the series of Nash Ramblers  -  strange, hulking, almost fat-cheeked, bug-eyed looking large cars. I loved them, they were great fun to ride in and look at. For my grandmother's crazy years, at Greystone, I'd occasionally be driven there for a visit, and always requested her big car for my ride. My Aunt Mae drove very slowly, wincing and peering through her funny 1950's jeweled glasses  -  pointed and peaked. She looked like one of those 1950's caricatures you see now in the old ads, reprinted. The 1950's were strange times.







My Uncle Walter, you may recall, was the German seaman/merchant marine, in New York harbor who was alerted by his brother, while on shore leave, not to return to Germany on that Hapag Lloyd cargo ship because he'd be inducted into the German (National Socialist) Navy, or so the story went. He stayed in Yorkville instead  -  the German district of NYCity, upper east, met my aunt, learned enough rudiments of English by going to endless westerns and other movies, and simply stayed here. They married, and moved early on to Union City, NJ, across the Hudson. Much more than that  -  of their late 1940's life, and the earlier years of the 1950's, I just don't know. They had two girls, wonderful cousins to me back then, Barbara and Christine. Walter purchased this property, and built this home  -  over time. I remember my father, and my other Uncle (his brother) Joe, spending weekends sometimes up there working on this house. It was built, turned out well, and was great  -  a real house, not a cabin, on a wooded lot at the near top of a dirt-road incline with a few other shabby shacks on it along the way up. The point I was making originally was in the 'deliberateness' of his approach  -  one slack piece after the other, note by note, so to speak  -  planned out, worked over, formulated and executed; done. It was a wonder to me. I always saw it as one person, one man, against everything else, setting out to do something that only he saw, and getting through it, finishing the project  -  which then became tangible, physical and real. People lived in his idea! I visited. My cousins grew up in. There's so much there, many other memories and thoughts, which perhaps I'll eventually get to. Suffice it to say that  -  to my continual wonderment  -  it had been done. Many years later, long after he'd died, I had a dream of this place  -  out of the blue, no real reason for it. As vivid as it was in real life, I envisioned a stone roadway, a gully, a walking path, all lined by rocks  -  round, smooth, dark-colored rocks  -  everything leading up to the house at the top. We were walking it  -  myself and I think it was my aunt, but who knows  -  how dreams go  -  and everywhere I looked there was a sign attached  -  'made by Walter', or 'made by hand by Walter', on most everything. And along the side of the road, was a stone pyramid-shrine sort of thing, beautifully made, of stone, and topped with a sign-plaque reading the same 'Made by Hand by Walter.'  It was only many years later, 50 years almost, that I learned the to me curious fact (it didn't really change the equation much, but, still) that this house was actually a kit house, purchased from Sears  -  a large, elaborate project, and a large home to boot -  built by plan. My aunt told me that this lumber came, each piece and section bundled, wrapped and numbered, by truck, in stages, for use and assembly  -  the project guidebook referred number-by-number to each board, plank and beam, with sequence and instruction. One piece by one piece, after having poured the footing and foundations, digging the cellar, plotting the land, etc., the house went up  -  windows, eaves, chimney, rooflines, etc., one section at a time. I was amazed, and only after that, doing some research, I found that many of the older homes we still see today, in town after town, are Sears kit-homes. There were many and varied styles, expense-levels and layouts available; and that's how so many contractors back then got their start as well. I need not reiterate that it was, obviously, a different world then  -  much different; smaller-scale, slower and probably wiser. My aunt said Walter kept notebooks of the entire step-by-step process  -  writing down all along the way each step as it was done. And  -  a last note (here, by me)  -  on the means of his death and that 'made by Walter/made by hand' dream : when they finally retired, my aunt and uncle bought a retirement-community home at the Jersey shore area. Some 'golden-age' community of nice, secure single-family homes. They were supposed to live there, quietly, easily, in their retirement, with little to do. My Uncle Walter, in his eternal and frenzied work-energy, found a means of machining lawn-sprinkler heads, and a design for installation and proper-plumbing of these, into a lawn-watering system, automatic and timed, on his lawn. It worked so well he eventually began doing neighbors' homes, one after the other, small-scale work projects, for payment. Never stopping, endlessly at it  -  which is how my aunt rued his passing; the idea that, even in 90 degree heat 'Walter's energy kept him at this work'. She'd say she told him a hundred times to stop it, give it up, it wasn't needed, the heat was too much, he was too old for the digging and installing. But anyway, it's how he died  - at work, not having taken his 'medication', in heat, stricken on someone's lawn. I never knew, by the way, how he felt about having had to give up that country hilltop made-by-hand house because of my aunt's travel complaints. It was never mentioned again  -  except when my Aunt Mae would say   -  'Oh, Walter so loved that place.'


It was Delmore Schwartz who wrote the phrase 'In Dreams Begin Responsibilities', and I guess that idea is pretty much true. My Uncle Walter's situation being a case in point, it could be argued that his failure was in keeping his 'dream' controlled enough so that it didn't kill him. Which it did  -  that, and his habit, according to my aunt, of never taking his medications. Whatever that means. Old people prescriptions lead to the equal responsibilities of doctors to quit herding people into pill-popping corrals merely for the benefit of the doctors. And, it's the equal responsibility of the 'people' to quit having so much faith in doctors so as to constantly run to them and take their prattle. It's all a scam. There are few salient points to make : the human body takes care of itself, oftentimes even in the most extreme conditions. Time heals things; it takes a few days, or longer, but the essential internal medication awareness level and power of the body to maintain itself sets in. It's all about 'Harmony'. A harmonious relationship between thought and action, outlook and awareness, routine and habit, make the difference. Most people are crippled before they even begin. The Medical Industry is a sham. People fall for it, and the industry itself is, in turn, reinforced by most every other aspect of the society around us  -  the directors of which are all co-conspirators in the same wicked weave. When my mother was a young mother, first landed in Avenel, and my sister and myself were the only two kids, those early days, 1954 through 1959, let's say, she was totally in thrall to the availability and presence of the dawning 'medical' industry. Unwittingly. She fell for it all, not knowing any better. To her, it was the height of ease to be in a place were the local pharmacy made house calls. A phone call away, the doctor-patient-pharmacy connection was made. My mother was  totally dependent on all this  -  it pretty much destroyed any self-reliance that there could have been. Too bad  -  every child's ear ache, every cough or hack, ache or pain, brought a doctor's call and then the stupid little pharmacy car, driven by some efficiently polite high-schooler, would pull up out front and the pills would be delivered. The doctors were all in Perth Amboy  -  adjacent to the hospital. A real business hub, to be sure  -  little black bags, house-call-days, office visits, and  -  as needed  -  hospital room but a half block away. How quaint. This all retained, in its way, an urban idea of nearness and service, I guess. I never knew what they thought  -  my mother was constantly on the talk about ills, medicine, doses and doctors, in the same way she was enamored of priests and events at the local church. All together, wrapped as one, it was simply a case of dependency-necessity (my phrase). She was hopelessly caught up in the idea of 'needing'.

There's a small book called. 'Surrealist Intrusion In the Enchanter's Domain'; a small, interesting volume, from D'Arcy Galleries, sometime about 1966. I know of it (have it in my hands right now), because I stole it from the Studio School Library, about that time. It still has the distribution or circulation card in the back, due date Dec. 1, 1972. On page 123, the page for Surrealist artist Mimi Parent, (born 1924) there's a great but tiny and pithy little quote  -  'Knock hard, life is deaf'. I always adored that quote.

A while ago I touched briefly on another matter  -  the idea of God as a verb, part of that Fuller thing. The American Constitution, the deliberations, declarations, and all the rest, only dealt with this subconsciously  -  and even now most of the time it is referred to obliquely, in terms of slavery and slavery alone. The simple phrase 'All men are created equal' is never really joined with the premise of separation of church and state, but they are entwined. Part of the misleading myth of the American system is that the premises involved somehow overlooked the fact of an ongoing slavery. I dispute that  -  in addition I believe that Slavery as an issue was never considered. It was part and parcel of the American business system, both as it was then and as it was growing to me. The might and power, economically, of the new United States  -  and everyone knew this  -  demanded and accepted a continuation of the planter/slave mentality. No one had it, then, as an ongoing issue, and it only became one later. What the phrase 'All men are created equal' really referred to, as I see it, after study and after consideration of 'broader' issue, is a response to the exceptionalism of the Jews, or, at least, the supposed exceptionalism. I'll be brief  -  you can scoff, call me a bastard or a fool, I don't care; I'm from Avenel. Before their was a USA, Pieter Stuyvesant refused to allow a shipload of Jews to dock and settle in New York (Niuew Amsterdam) Harbor. He was over-ridden and did the bidding of others. I myself feel it was a grevious error. Look at what we have now  -  but, whatever.  "[1654 On this Rosh Hashanah we remember the year 1654 or 5414. It is without doubt the most important year in American Jewish history, for in September of that year, 23 Jews arrived in Nieuw Amsterdam after leaving Recife, Brazil. Recife is located in the Brazilian state of Pernambuco. It is on the Atlantic coast and therefore a good deal east of North America. The Jews who had lived in Recife came there because the colony was in Dutch hands and the Dutch were Protestants. Therefore the Inquisition was not known in Recife. However, on August 3, 1645, the Portuguese won the battle of Taboca and thereafter succeeded in pushing the Dutch out of Brazil entirely. Nine years later, in January of 1654, the last Dutch left Brazil and sailed for the nearest Dutch town in New Netherlands. Included in that Dutch exodus were the 23 Jews fleeing from the Catholic Inquisition, as the Portuguese were Catholics. Having arrived in Nieuw Amsterdam they found that the governor, Peter Stuyvesant, did not welcome them. On the contrary. He thought Jews should not be allowed in his colony. However, he asked the Dutch West India Company, who owned Nieuw Amsterdam, whether or not Jews could remain. The company told him that the Jews should remain and that led to the establishment of the Chosen People in America. Nothing more fortunate ever happened to this country. Surely, all of history shows that whoever treats the Children of Israel with dignity, honor and respect is rewarded as have been the people of the United States. Conversely, those who persecute Jews design their own destruction, as can be seen by the examples of Spain, Germany, Russia and, next, the Arab Jew haters. They cannot survive. Once the Jews had settled in the Dutch city they opened retail shops or practiced crafts. As usual, the government would not let Jews serve in the military but taxed them for not serving in the military.]" My point here is that the Founding Fathers, or whatever we call that bunch of guys, stipulated clearly their opposition to the point of Jewish self-awareness partaking of its sense of 'Superiority'  -  they would not tolerate that attitude, in fact, made sure to say 'All men are created equal'  -  no one is special of God, no one or no group has the inside track of the 'Lord's ear', and they were not about to tolerate any of that gimcrackery. Of course, it arrived anyway, money reared its ugly head, lucre and search for glint and gold and profit, followed by the usual Papist stupidity and all the other rank religions of Europe and  -  well  -  here we are today. I will move on. If you go around making a real point of stating 'All men are created equal', putting it right out there for all to see, believe me, people have a very good idea what you're stating  -  and they did then. The currents of religion in those days were, and always had been, pretty tired of chasing around the idea that there were two classes of people, and the outrageous theologies which had built up around that idea. Here an entire 'race' or tribe or breed of them, however they termed it one week or the next, made claims of a 'touched' and sacred superiority over other men, made mention of being selected, addressed, desired and chosen by God. That was irrational in and of itself. It was then, and it is now. The rationalists, in ascendance, were sure to put an end to it  -  designing a new society, one free of the rabid constraints of the sort of class and breed claims, the twisted logics and must-beliefs of 'religion', the claims to holiness. This was to be a clean, clear, free and revised place. All men are created equal...endowed by their 'Creator'...life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. See ya', get outt'a my way, leave me alone. Thanks. Anyway, that's how it began; didn't last, got twisted itself, grew into way too much, fell apart, lost its wind, and took up the slow, sad walk of slavery again.

About 1960, give or take, there was a lot going on, even for a little kid, to notice. I've written before about the crystal radio thing stuffed in the corner of my attic, near the room I slept in, and all that U2 spy-plane, Francis Gary Powers and the Eisenhower canceled summit with the Soviets; I've written about Sputnik and the two competing space programs of the two competing 'great' powers of the day (where they got that idea from, I never understood). Everything was lies  -  we inflated the percentage of the GNP that the Soviets put towards their 'Defense' programs and military ( we called it that but meant 'offense'), and they, in turn, inflated all the relative merits and evils of what 'we'd' done. False and stupid powers, both, but, whatever  -  I'd grown up thinking 'we' were better just by the fact of 'US vs them' always meant 'us' to me and not The United State. It was sad how all levels of schooling and public information and deportment swayed an slanted all information towards that dichotomy. It was never spoken of as 'Propaganda', but it was, in all essential ways and undertakings. We lied to ourselves. During those years, very meany things happened, and a lot of them I still remember clearly. The 1958 model-year cars came out with dual headlights on either side, a new thing and a first, making four headlights total. Still round, yes, and just plain headlamps, but doubled. It was weird to see and it was notable. Then the further development, with like Lincoln and Buick, was to slant the headlamps, 2 together, on two matching sides of the grill  -  meaning the cars began to resemble these oddball monsters with weird, crooked eyes. Then there was the Edsel introduction. We heard it was a big flop  -  and, yes, it was ugly  -  those big, pursed lips of a vertical grill, looking like a big you know what waiting for entry  -  the media more politely referred to it as a 'horse' collar or an 'oxen' collar. What's a 10-year old know? The only people I did ever knew with one of them, bought new and fresh, was the Bertini family, about 4 doors down from my house  -  who later left, shortly after that anyway, for their relocation to Alhambra, California or somewhere near there. I never heard from or of them again. And then topping it all off, was the somehow staggering yet obscure news that one Albert Eichmann had been captured in Argentina and smuggled or stolen back to Israel to stand trial for the killing of Jews  -  countless only by seeing numbers, and the evidences and explanations of what was going on, which were huge and bizarre to a ten-year-old mind. Little had really ever been imparted to me about what really had occurred  -  we all knew our fathers and such had fought in the world war which had ended just our births, more or less, and we'd heard of Hitler, and all the horrid things he'd done. But always pushed in our face was the Soviets, threat from Russia, Marxists, all that 'we will bury you' claptrap  -  washing machines and Dick Nixon kitchens and not much more. The German were our friends and the Russians, the Commies, once our friends were now out enemies. It made little sense and  -  like everything else because of this stupid fact/fantasy twisting  -  just became foggy, hazy and confusing. What difference any of it made, I never really knew  -  it had no reality. Was I to suppose those poor, oppressed, backwards wards of the Soviet Union had no life of their own? That there G.U.M. department store in Moscow sold only haystacks, shovels, hammers and sickles? There was no modernity there? Children had no fun? Parents did not make love? Joy had no handle in dark, bleak Russia? The picture seemed all wrong, no matter how else it was painted or sketched. America seemed too headstrong in its brash, lying way about representing what was, and I was already growing tired of it.

Adolf Eichmann was a Nazi officer who rose to the rank of lieutenant in Hitler's army. The rank seems modest in the light of his later notoriety, but then again, what is a rank and what does it signify anyway? A combination, in a way, of following orders, doing a good job, and time. His task, largely completed, was to move millions of Jewish people and a small number of others, from their homes to the death camps where most would perish. Following the end of the war, Eichmann slipped out of Germany with forged Red Cross transit papers and made his way Argentina, where he worked as a foreman at a Mercedes factory. In 1960, Israeli agents captured him, took him to a 'safe house,' interrogated him, and then smuggled him out of Argentina to Israel where he was put on trial for crimes against humanity and crimes against the Jewish people. After a year-long public trial he was convicted by a three-judge panel and sentenced to death. He remains the only person to suffer the death penalty following conviction in a non-military court in the history of Israel. When all that news broke, it was like  thunderclap went off inside my head  -  there was really still a Jewish presence and a question? There were remnants of NAZI and Hitler stuff still around? Splattered all over the news, these tendentious articles, florid portrayals of Death and its sufferings, accusations and demotions  -  all those Eichmann tales and pictures. For a moment, the world seemed to revel anew in the review of past and cloistered moments, as if all those skeletal phantasms of the dead and dying all had come back to life to breath their old air back into the present. I was young, but I took this all in. It startled me how people used words, hard words, to portray others, rightly or wrongly, and to counter their supposed right and fixed and concrete versions of the 'world as is' with the contrasted pictures and portrayals of some other sort of vermin-world with which the globe had recently been affected and then cleansed. It all came back  -  new German might? Just a filth. All those German 'everymen', walking around, making their new, friendly and strong and 'right-with-America' country (whom we'd helped and salvaged and given countless fundings to) ALL guilty, ALL in hiding. Just a filth. I was baffled.

The Columbia University writer and political philosopher Hannah Arendt penned a truly interesting account of all this, covering the trial for the New Yorker magazine (and later collected as 'Eichmann In Jerusalem', her book - subtitled most famously as 'A Report on the Banality of Evil'. As all this unfolded, I was fascinated, intrigued and enchanted, and totally taken over by what I considered here as truly intellectual endeavors on her part. She presented Eichmann's trial as a national event  -  in Israel, filled with survivors and a country itself only thirteen years old. The entire nation was caught up in this mirrored re-run of recent and still-raw history. They seemed, as did the rest of the 'media' in general, truly interested to learn about this man who had run the railroad carrying Polish and Hungarian Jews to death camps. If Mussolini had 'made the trains run on time', Eichmann, in his way, had kept other trains filled. Even unto the very end of the war, his efforts were unceasing, without slack. Crowds out side the courthouse would yell for his death. He'd become the embodiment of all Nazis, the monstrosity's concentrated essence. Paris Soir declared Eichmann had 'snake eyes.' A Dutch newspaper wrote: 'Adolph Eichmann...had become a non-man, a phenomenon of absolute godlessness and non-humanness.' One Harry Mulish, paraphrasing the prosecutor, wrote 'it is no longer possible to believe in God; now let it at least be possible to believe in the Devil.' Eichmann was even portrayed as ;worse than Hitler'. With a cool aplomb, Arendt kept writing  -  Eichmann was not a monster, not a freak, and not a man apart to any degree at all. He was, instead, strikingly similar to the ordinary people who walk the street of any city in any nation in the modern world. His failure was to be all too ordinary. He did what he did because he was a conformist, a man demonstrating the qualities of likeability and respect for authority that at most places, at most times, help men get ahead and make them respected members of society. He did not say no to his superiors. He did not question the larger institutions and communities he was a part of. He worked diligently to perform his duties and to help those who worked under him perform theirs and accomplish their task. He sought the greatest possible efficiency  -  in a sense, the Nazi in a gray flannel suit; a thoughtless, modestly cheerful conformist. She wrote "Despite all efforts of the prosecution, everybody could see that this man was not a 'monster,' but it was difficult indeed not to suspect that he was a clown...The judges were right when they finally told the accused that all he had said was 'empty talk, - except that they thought the emptiness was feigned, and that the accused wished to cover up other thoughts which, though hideous, were not empty." She was arguing the opposite: he was empty in the specific manner of the functionary, the booster of organizations, the too-loyal citizen. This was a rejection of the moral judgement of Eichmann among the Israeli public. By labeling Eichmann a moral monster, Israel's press and political leadership established the first part of a two-part drama: to isolate and capture all that is evil.  The second step is to destroy it. But she understood Eichmann's significance in different terms  -  she was linking what was wrong with Eichmann to what's wrong with everyone, including Jews and especially conformist, institution-minded Jews. She, in fact, particularly went after the leaders of the Judenrate, the official leadership organizations of the Jewish communities throughout German-controlled Europe, empowered by the Nazis to exercise a bit of control over the ghettoes. These bodies were called on to provide lists of Jews, to keep order on the Nazi's behalf, and on occasion to organize the assembly of those scheduled to be deported to the camps. The leaders of these groups, she wrote, were the very essence of bureaucratic morality  -  always compromising with evil, giving up their claims on decency inch by inch, heads held high all the while.  The light she thereby chose to shine on this sort of complicity was not particularly welcome among the Jewish public in the early 1960's. Interestingly, as I tried keeping track, it went on and all these cross-currents and battering-rams of words and argument flowed everywhere  -  over a place and a situation I'd had no part nor knowledge of yet one which held me in its grasp nonetheless, even young and famished for anything as I was. The crazy house in my backyard, and the prison just beyond it, held nothing over this drama, new drama, with old words. Some people who held important posts in Jewish organizations and in the Israeli government itself, and reparation-groups, included, were the very same people who had run the Judenrate. In a new age of organization and bureaucracy and institutionalization, a critique against the very people of Israel itself was bound to make enemies. I felt, within me somehow, that the people among whom I'd grown up  -  all those still-current Inman Avenue and Avenel people I knew  -  were themselves just unthinking order-followers, folks always ready to just go along, cease thinking, and get by. Their assembled and societal outrage against anything non-conforming  -  from Beatniks to McCarthy's victims  -  proved it all for me.

So then, back to my uncle, those years, and myself. It was more than building a house I suppose; that's fairly obvious. Such as it was, there was a time in the mid-seventies when I studied Yiddish  -  not so much as language but as history, and from that I got a few things I always liked : in the book 'The World of Our Fathers', there are some grand pages on old Yiddish poetry and the writers of same. I was trying to mold all these things together. Kissinger was everywhere in the news then  -  a perfectly ordinary Jewish-secular dolt, doing his statesman stuff, kissing the boots of the likes of Nixon and the rest, but he was, nonetheless am embodiment of the secular Jew in the world, maybe at work, transforming things. I took it that way  -  suddenly I was interested again. I wanted to be a Jew. I considered, really, a conversion. I considered learning Law. The laws of Deep Religion, in a Talmudic scholar's way, the perfectly obtuse laws of the secular, litigious world too. It all passed, but there were parts of it everywhere. I somehow found myself, by 1978, transforming into some other sort of diffident, perfectly precise and burdened Holy Man Writer, wanting by those effects to change the world myself  -  but, more importantly, to do it all alone and only by the fire of a pen while I worked in the world, a hidden man doing a simple job. Mani Leib  -  not experimental in any way, a perfectly ordinary Yiddish (Jewish) poet, spoke to me : 'But blessed be, Muse, for your bounties still....I am not a cobbler who writes, thank Heaven, but a poet, who makes shoes.'

I used to walk the streets of the east side  -  the low east side, where real shabby people lived, where Death was always present and things were always running out  -  running out of time or money or good sense or luck or fair deals or chances :  'Of all rich streets, most dear to me, is my shabby Jewish East Broadway. Graying houses  -  two uneven rows; frail, restless and exhausted bodies.' That's all gone now  -  all those places, the two-deep tenement-crumbling hovels packed and smelling of people. It was all going when I was here, though pieces and remnants still existed. Now it's all gone, mostly forever  -  plastic shacks instead, of Chinese shit, cheap goods, on the move eateries, finger foods, jewelry, hair and nail salons, two-window leftover hardware and pet stores. It's crazy. The Spanish and then the Asian, tumbled and locked together, have distorted anew and changed everything. A few ancient old people still linger  -  but they're gone even as I type this. 'My Indian Summer, like an offering, burns into gold and spirals of smoke. With brown hand, I push my last starry ember through the ash.' There was one Yiddish poet last name Halpern, who developed a character named Moishe Leib ('Moishe Leib the Rascal') wrote a nice piece admonishing a son, or someone, not to become a poet, to become anything else instead. I liked it : 'My son and heir, I swear that, just as none disturb the dead in their rest, so, when you have finally grown, I'll leave you thoroughly alone. Want to be a loan shark, a bagel-lifter? Be one, my child. Want to murder, set fires, or be a grifter? Be one, my child. But one thing, child, I have to say: if once ambition leads you to try to make some kind of big display to write about moonlight and the moon, or some poem of the Bible, poisoning the world, then, my dear, I'll chop up, like a miser shredding cake for beggars at a wedding, all the ties that bind us now.' Moishe Leib becomes, in this manner, the name of his discontent. Halpern was 'perhaps the most original poet to have appeared in America: not the central figure, not the most fulfilled writer, but the fiercest and most forceful. In his abrasive poems, half song and half curse, Halpern brought together the traditional resources of Yiddishkeit, the satiric thrust of Mendele, and the parodic-violent sensibility of modernism. A rebel against the poverty-stricken life, he grew into a rebel against his own rebelliousness: "Help me, oh God, to spit upon the world and in you and on myself." Halpern introduced into Yiddish the disgust, the raging imprecation, the livid self-assault we associate with modern poetry. A demon races through Halpern's lines, the demon of self...in the the weaker poems, a drop of self-pity, but in the strong ones it is objectified through a brilliant persona, Moshe Leib the rascal. At best there is a cruel interplay between the speaker of the poem and the takhshit he addresses: Moshe Leib the wolf tearing at his own flesh; Moshe Leib the buffoon dancing in Coney Island or warning his young son not to be a poet...In the spiraling of his mind there was no fixed point at which irony could settle. He'd said of himself that he was "everywhere a stranger struggling anxiously like my brother Don Quixote with windmills.' And further, he wrote, in referencing to his having no use for the cult of beauty, to which Di Yunge had pledged themselves "Much as I struggle only to see what is beautiful, I see only what is repulsive, a piece of rotten carcass." (see 'Di Yunge', a 1907 group of Jews in America, newly-arrived, who  -  oppressed by their isolation  -  started a little magazine called 'Yugend' (Youth)  -  they refused political commitment and denied any speaking for national ideals; never at home in America, they turned instead to aesthetic autonomy, the search for beauty and goodness, and symbolist refinement). Halpern, by contrast, wrote of his non-affection for the new world in different terms : he exploded  -  he reacted by an ultimate assault on the moral and psychic impoverishment of the immigrant world, warning against those who want "to get at the hidden bit of cheese/under my ass, behind my knees." (from 'The Bird'). In his work there was a strange combination of bitter Nihilism and odd tenderness  -  truly, a displaced person. He has been compared to Baudelaire. In another culture he might have become a desperado like Rimbaud or an aristocrat of letters like Stefan George, but here he had no choice. He died in the east Bronx, in the shabbiness of the litter of Wicks Avenue. Our own Jew Poe.

Once again, in the case of Arendt, these ideas were bound to make enemies. People said ''she's blaming the Jews?' The problem, as she put it, centered around the ability and the habit of the individual  -  every individual  -  to think and reflect on his or her actions. 'Cliches, stock phrase, adherences to conventional, standardized codes of expression and conduct have the socially recognized function of protecting us against reality, that is, against the claim on our thinking attention that all events and facts make by virtue of their existence. If we were responsive to this claim at all times, we would be exhausted; Eichmann differed from the rest of us only in that he clearly knew of no such claim at all.' I was hit hard by that, because I immediately realized  -  in a completely different manner than she'd meant  -  that I, as myself, as a creative person blowing out under my own forced development, by me, was 'responsive to this claim at all time' and thereby  -  yes  -  totally exhausted and completely under siege. If one develops the 'muse' so to speak, the muse so to speak becomes voracious and all consuming. There is no way out  -  it must be listened to. Which is smack-dab right where it led me. I was using Arendt here as my guide to some other place, different from what she'd meant, but it worked as well, and  -  just as well  -  it covered and gave me insight into what she was writing about to. I was infatuated by all this. Later, in Elmira College with that little German professor lady Christina Rosner, previously mentioned, I'd take this to yet another, fuller step, studying German history, literature, and the entire Nazi era to he hilt. Only a new dawn that I'd not yet fully recognized, was coming on over me. Over my little sad-man Avenel darkness. 'Get out now, while you're still alive', it was speaking. I never really had a friend in daily contact with me who could share these ideas  -  growing minds between boys were getting scarce. I had my erstwhile friend Aleck, of Alex, then known and referred to by me anyway  -  his place, once I got rolling to it pretty steadily at about age 11 or whatever, it represented to me at least the best 'intellectual' enclave I could find  -  he had this very neat little room of his own, long and straight, attached along the side of his house, and I found it filled with grand things  -  a pen-pal from Ghana, little plastic drawer units filled with trinkets and interesting items, books, travel items, navigation maps, NY harbor schematics. This was about the time of Yuli Daniel and Andrei Sinyafsky, Soviet prisoners of conscience, and among the two of us it all had a vital currency. Besides, his father was a cool Russian guy, and I always thought his mother was wonderful and warm. I just took to the place, previously mentioned. In addition, also previously mentioned, across the street from my own house was the house of my other friend, Donald, and his brother Richard  -  an attic full of comic books, stuff by the hundreds. I remember Donald's early fixation and interest in non-fiction and 'war' related items  -  books such as Barbara Tuchman's 'Guns of August', for instance. That was an early indicator, and a grand WWI non-fiction read. Earlier than that, for myself, I can remember walking around outside my own house, reading (or trying to read) 'Kidnapped' by Robert Louis Stevenson. I never knew why, but it just never held me; I could find little interest in a book of that nature. Don't yet know why. Looking back now, of course, these things just mentioned  -  Aleck, Donald, and the books  -  all seem as strange little vignettes of an odd, non-societal young kid. But, such it was. I had a good crowd.



72. I read a book entitled 'Norwegian Wood', by Haruki Murakami, which, on page 25, included a statement that went as follows: '...there remained inside me a vague knot-of-air thing. And as time went by, the knot began to take on a clear and simple form, a form that I am able to put into words like this  -  "Death exists, not as the opposite but as a part of life." Translated into words, it's a cliche but at the time I felt it not as words but as that knot of air inside me. Death exists - in a paperweight, in four red and white balls on a billiard table - and we go on living and breathing it into our lungs like fine dust. Until that time, I had understood Death as something entirely The hand of Death is bound to take us I had felt, but until the day it reaches out for us, it leaves us alone. This had seemed to me the simple, logical truth. Life is here, death is over there. I am here, not over there.' Then he goes on to say... 'The night Kizuki died, however, I lost the ability to see death (and life) in such simple terms. Death was not the opposite of life. It was already here, within my being, it had always been here, and no struggle would permit me to escape that. When it took the seventeen-year-old Kizuki that night in May, death took me as well." At the time I read this, sometime in the mid 1990's, I'd perhaps heard the same thing once or twice before but never quite figured it out. It seemed to be, somehow, a specious argument or statement, the kind of thing only those blockheads who tend to think about these things in specific and pointed terms think about. The sort of person who demands answers, but only the answers he thinks he needs. No other conclusion would do. But then, in the same vein, I guess you're wondering 'what's something like this doing in a piece like this?' Well, let me go on. I never saw a dead person in my  entire life  -  until, I guess  -  quite late. I'd seen photos of death  -  my father had a few snapshots of his mother, dead, in a coffin I think it was. I always considered that odd, but people said it was not so uncommon in poorer circles of European populations. She was quite dead. I'd seen photos of dead outlaws and wild-west figures  -  those sharpshooter and criminal gun-fighter types who's get killed and then propped up against walls, or in a coffin propped up, to have early-photography shots taken of their corpses. western outlaw history books are full of them. I have a few. In 1972, Michael Lesey published a book entitled 'Wisconsin Death trip', the entire theme of which was the oddities of frontier death, photos and situations together. Pretty gruff, and pretty cool. People don't do that anymore. I guess the idea of a quick, calculated embalming and then burial in a fancy casket befitting one's station (or imagined station) in life  -  as if it makes any difference at all to Death  -  has taken over, had become industrialized enough to be a forceful lobby and advertising pitch for others to feed off. Burial is big business  -  'The American Way of Death' tell us that  -  another nice, early read  -  by Jessica Mitford, early on filled me in. But, looming larger than that always, has been the idea of death itself  -  the 'what is it, and why and how does it occur, does it stay over our heads at all times, are we meant to be aware of it, conscious of time slipping away?' all that stuff. A carbuncle on an otherwise smooth skin. It was only in 1981, at the funeral of my other grandmother, my mother's mother, that I saw a dead body for the first time. She was in her coffin, dead  -  simply that and nothing more. It seemed serene and settled, there was no debating it, and certainly no movement nor wavering on the proposition that  -  in some certain as well as uncertain way  -  Death had arrived, done its business to whatever this was, and then left, I suppose, with it. But, I thought to myself, just as much as Death had 'arrived', it had, just as well, always been present, looming or just waiting. 25 years later, Murikami's book brought it all to the front again with that stupid, posed question : where is this Death, and what, always, is it part of. Is it with us, or does it just take us? The point was, what's up, and how is it  -  it's like a minor joke of mine now, when the kids at work tell me they're going outside to 'have a cigarette.' I reply, 'No you're not; you're going outside to NOT have a cigarette, because when you come back you will no longer have it  -  you see, your 'having it' results somehow in your not having it.' I mean it is a silly quandary but  -  oh my  -  it's also so deep. So then, in Life, the parting from it is 'part' of it as well? It makes me think, sometimes, so onerously it is that how can anyone get anything done? At this particular funeral, by the way, all I really remember, much more than my dead grandmother's presence, was the weird and eerie gnashing of teeth and wailing of my aunts  -  the daughters, and a niece or two. They were literally wailing, calling out 'Mama!', shrieking, it seemed, at very Death itself  -  this went on, and became even more grievous at the final stages of dirt being thrown over a descended into the ground casket. To me it was all the more horrible, tribal, vital though the reverse of vital just as much. I was shaken, far more than moved or sorrowful. All the rest of it meant nothing. What could possibly be the purpose? If this rides with us, and this is considered the end, as much as some 'beginning' of a supposed afterlife that, all along the way, had offered no real 'communication' about anything  -  rather leaving us ion the dark, in a lurch, as we tried working things along  -  than what regard was any of that due? It couldn't be 'holy', for holy meant having a sacred regard, a particular form of sense and grace to be revered. Life itself was such a filthy mess, filled with liars and cheats, misrepresentation, homicidal maniacs and mentally decrepit people on the make for passing (their own) passing gain that that couldn't be anything specifically set aside for us to revere. It all caused confusion and consternation. Of course, just as much, during the years that I found myself strapped into seminary days, that too offered no answers, as I saw from a sort-of 'other' side what went into the mumbo-jumbo and mystification which was supposed to salvage the mess of people and put things right. it was all gibberish, purloined information, and things made up all along the way  -  death just as much as anything. I searched, looked around for all I could find, and reached some answers, yes, but nothing definitive. of course; how could I? Death is one of those question, like the weather, say, that everyone talks about but no one does anything about. Or something. Even in my back-search through Judaism  -  as in the previous chapter  -  I found little : 'even the most militant Judaism does not really speak to the question of whether or not we are living for the sake of heaven, perhaps the best and most Jewish question there is. The book of Ecclesiastes offers this: ' For to him that is joined to all the living there is hope, for a living dog is better than a dead lion. For the living know that they shall die; but the dead know nothing not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.' (Ecc. 9:4-5). Pretty brutal stuff, I thought  -  even the memory of them is forgotten. If that was so, exactly what was the worth of any of this, anything at all? Someone should tell me, I thought, no one did. Wasn't it a principal of society itself that we live with all these monuments and memorials and soundings of holiday and remembrance in order to keep the taproot of past and present together? Or was that -   just as much as anything else  -  all the same torrid line of crap which was served daily to the feeble masses? How fucking crazy was any of this? What foundation then, really, was there  -  to stand on or to live off of? Nothing. All was vaporous  -  even the most traditional form of quaint piety had hit a foul ball on those counts. It started to dawn on me that there really was no 'universal' religious condition  -  all was manageable and secular, and mostly made up in order just to keep things going; to keep people in their correct boxes, routines and within their maladies  -  so they could be successfully and continually manipulated and controlled by other powers. This is all still operative, and no one steps up to push back. When they do, they're as good as goldfish out of water, and just as soon dead, collected and thrown away  -  but, oh, first memorialized everywhere. I  can't forget that. Go ask Thom Paine.

Death takes a back seat to living  -  that was kind of the conclusion I came up with. A person can't just be continually consumed by the idea : it (Death) allows for nothing else. If one lets it, it becomes all consuming. I think that's pretty evident, especially in many of those castes, classes and creeds still existent in the Asian subcontinent, where acolytes and hermits of a sort continually abash themselves and lie about consumed by death, the idea of, the concept of. Some modern day equivalent of the older medieval flagellants, slowly prancing (writhing and contorting) from town to town and village square to village square scaring, humiliating and exhorting people to die, or at least to be aware of same. Which then became the basis for morality plays, operas, music, theater, and all the rest of that claptrap. What a whirlwind of a world has being created  -  in spite of goodness and well-intentioned antics; custom-made for the usual usurpation by gross secular powers intent on establishing territory, lineage, kingship, economies and lucre. Truly horrid stuff we all must still live with. (Please don't let today's version of that  -  the politician with his or her dick hanging out, mouth flapping, the religious leader quickly covering up an erection or a violation of creed, the slandered pandering to the pretends of pretension, throw you off. It's all the same, very same, bullshit. Cavis canem, caveat emptor, however you want to say it). For myself, I strike out swinging at no other man's pitch. If I'm going to whiff, it'll be while swinging at my own thrown ball.

I spent some time reading Japanese authors. As I mentioned here, Murikami and - previously mentioned back a ways  -  Yukio Mishima (who was actually not so much an 'Japanese author' as a Japanese aberration who wrote a few books). Japanese writers are a strange lot. They write straight and plain and happy. They write in blocks, and in ways that aren't often seen in the west  -  descriptively different, solid and without much of the discursive Sturm/Drang stuff, the philosophical doubts and quagmires into which western writers often drag the reader. I like that stuff, the westerners style, so I'm not complaining  - it's just that I don't/didn't often find that in Japanese writers, and that difference was notable and stark. Kenzaburo Oe has a couple of books in which he administers, through the writing, to his Down's syndrome son  -  in the best of ways, the connection is made, the writing is spot on, and sometimes the endings and impulses are grand. I always had looked for, instead, the expectation of horror  - what I termed the 'horror imagination' of the Japanese, through their fiction and other writing at least  -  to be reflected in their writing; the awesome uncertainties and almost psychedelic distortions of the atomic bombs. Hiroshima and Nagasaki, forever entwined and entombed in the Japanese mind  -  survivors still in a daze, writing of fearsome monsters, weird crawling creatures, massively destructive forces twisting and ripping rail trains from their bridges and trains, planes from their runways, and innocent children from their homes and school seats. All vivid, all in a horror-reflected, resurrected and reborn manner. It was supposed to have lived on and on. Instead, by the 1990's, it seemed the modern Japanese writer had bested all of that, tamed the impulse towards flaming madnesses and become, instead, a grand formulator of reflexive prose, situational ethics, and almost dryly cogent reflection on western and transplanted mores. Japanese culture triumphant instead  -  the strange, more light-weight, touch. A Japanese Tea Ceremony in words. In the 1960's, to be sure, no one was reading any Japanese writers  -  people were just getting the hang of Yukio Mishima when he committed his ritual suicide, and that pretty much ended that episode. the only reflections it brought forth were the reactionary ones debunking the hard-right wing of Japanese political thought, and thereby successfully obfuscating any positive or intellectual thought it may have actually had. Thanks, Yukio. From that point on he just became 'legendary militaristic rightist, Yukio Mishima.' It took an entire other generation to come creeping up the ranks in order to put any of this back on a footing. I watched and read what I could, but it wasn't easy  -  I knew of no Japanese influx into my own sphere of influence at all, never really having had contact or interaction in any way with someone Japanese, even in the most cosmopolitan NYC atmospheres. In fact, in thinking back now, it was only in 1982 that I first became acquainted with someone  -  name now forgotten, Kenny somebody  -  who worked at Merck (I did their corporate-account printing) who was all caught up and excited, and who wouldn't stop talking about his impending 'promotion'  -  getting married and being reassigned to the new, expanding Merck Japan corporate market  -  he was raring to go and just about gone. I was intrigued by his interest in and enthusiasm for, Japanese culture and place. Too bad for him he wasn't creative in any way. He was just a suit and tie corporate office boy kind of guy. He went. I never saw or heard from him again. But, for starters, there it was. It was always funny to me, all that anti-orient stuff that was running through American society  -  it's called 'Asian' now, no one uses 'Oriental', but whatever. Because of that, it became very difficult to really reach Japanese writing. As Americans, anyway, we'd always been schooled and brought up thinking that there was nothing, just nothing, better or higher in achievement than American stuff  -  even though, of course, there was an entire, other, world. The sixth-grade teachers and the rest would regale us with the horror stories of Soviet lies about their achievements and superiorities and all that  -  more gibberish, it was all the same. What 'they' said about 'them', 'them' said, in turn, about 'they', and it all just went back and forth  -  crazy fucking idiots they all were, even crazier for thinking they could foist all that off on us. It was basically their own insecurities and hang-ups that we had to learn about. School is so much like a prison, mostly because of those reasons  -  teachers are assholes. Period, repeat. Assholes : they go about trouncing every droplet of creativity or original thought to fit their 'students' into some achievement hole which is in reality nothing more than a dictate by Government hand to keep their twisted society going and give these kids, as adults, some future idea of a role in it so as not to revolt, rock the boat, go sex-crazy and maim and rape and plunder, shoot adults, blow up the world and all its consideration...but that brings us right back to what the adult idiots as rulers and teachers do and were doing anyway  - so there's your perfect life-circle. Go figure that crap out. Teachers only care about themselves - they want constantly more money, alliances for pleasure, benefits, retirements, lawns, houses, cars, styles, fashion, places to go, discounted wing-dings, and every other concievable formation We were innocent bystanders and could do nothing  -  either take in all this bullshit and live with it, deny it and rebel, act the punk, or close the ears and just stay away. We always made claim to be 'winners', to be best and first. As it turned out the WE of we (USA) fabricated about as much of their ideals as anyone else, and belittled the rest. Out literature counted; read this, here's the timeline and here's the storyline. Second-best to us? Perhaps this;, ok then, you can read the English writers of the past. That was education as we knew it. I can't believe that teachers can still look themselves in the eyes, even if it is in their own stupid mirrors.

In 1960, sometime around then, there was a rash of American space-shot undertakings that became the rage -  one after another these little pre-orbital capsule rocket launches went off. The personalties of each of these John Glenns and Alan Shephards took priority in the big pages of Life and Look and Time and Newsweek and all that stuff  -  profiles of 'Amercia's Best'  -  the astronaut crews, their wives and families, etc. Funny about it all  -  these guys back then were maybe 28 years old, tops; they were portrayed as perfect specimens, Gods of Thunder, an entire new class of perfect, American men. As it turned out  -  and we were never told  -  they operated in a strict, almost military style strait-jacket of command and protocol, proscribed behavior, comments, actions and reactions. It was as tightly structured and controlled as anything and was all being used for propaganda purposes  -  on par with or even besting any Soviet effort, dogs, monkeys, Yuri Gagarin notwithstanding. Who really could tell the difference? Both societies lied and controlled. The biggest impression I take, and took , from it was the bizarre rationality of it all  -  American and Universal. Time and reality had been stopped and changed. A picture had been presented to the nation of a fixed and static cosmic universe and reality that could be measured, amplified correctly, distanced, controlled, used and put through its paces, for our benefit. Prime evidence of this reality was the sudden awareness everywhere of what was called 'the countdown'. You hear, upon the approach of another launch, amid all the plans and effort, that the 'countdown' had begun, for something perhaps two weeks away, or a week or whatever. they used weird, broadcast phrases: 'T-minus 55 and counting'. Stuff like that. What it was was a countdown of large numbers, all the way down through days and hours and minutes, until  -  of course  -  the very familiar 10-9-8... thing of the very end; at which point LIFTOFF! and all America would gasp, watching this little metal spool get drilled into space, twirl around do its arc and roll, and splash (or splatter) down into the sea somewhere (Soviets landed, by contrast, on hard Earth  -  a tougher achievement, even then, but nothing ever mentioned). I would think 'Imagine! breaking the world down, breaking Time itself, the very fabric of our existences, into a linear, logic'd, backwards sequence of descending numbers. It baffled me how anyone could do that, could approach life in that fashion  -  through sequence, rote, logic, linearity. It was crippling to me at 11 years old no less. Who were these people who commanded such powers, who forced me to break down enchantment and think in this manner, and why? Why would they do it and how could they lead such simple, perverse lives  -  people for whom clocks merely ticked, trains merely ran, cars simply went, light and darkness arose and faded together. Their one-dimensionality was stunning. It was nowhere near, in any way, the world I'd come from or the world I inhabited. By that ratio, I was Heavenly, of grace, gifted, wise. A physical world of such straight contortions (?) I did not want.


Now who do you suppose I could talk to about things and ideas such as these? no one at all  -  Inman Avenue and Avenel itself was a barren 'mindfield';  -  Mr. Cermayan sewing pillows and buttons, Mrs. Kuzmiak selling notions, socks and gloves, Mr. Metro selling baloney and crackers and milk. The little post office staffed by mules. The school people hunkered down in #4&5? Not a one. I had simply to keep quiet. Go along with the morass, and sink in its mire. There was nowhere to go.


My own mind held one opinion of its own  -  and still does. Unless we can properly explain the trap we have put ourselves in (using the eternal 'countdown' as an exemplar of it), the timeless world our spirits inhabit will remain trapped. To wit :  the division of Presence, or Time, or Being, into three distinct and separate phases  -  past, present and future. It was just those concepts that this bizarre reverse spaceshot countdown was broadcast to underscore -  I saw it as a means of propagandizing the reinforcement of the underlying assumptions of the workable mankind-style reality which had to be maintained. It had to be maintained, understand, in order for Business and Politics as known to continue and to prosper. That was the Devil's presence. That was 'Evil' on the Earth  -  it included churches, religion, schools and all the rest. It was imperative on each of those sections to reinforce and make rock-steady their expectation and rigidity of those concepts. The real Spirit World within each person had to be  stopped and this was the means of doing it. Three distinct separations, segmented and fragmented, static views of the world and all the 'history' stories, tales and fabrications which went with it. It kept (and keeps) all Humankind in the necessary cage. It's no different today, it's worse - EXCEPT that by so many means (physics, computers, new logic, intensification), freer-thinking by 'Creative' minds is here and there more plentiful and not afraid of the 'chimerical monster' of which we make 'Reality'. There is nothing like it, nothing at all. In fact, all that attests to is false : time, ages, dinosaurs, geological deposits, earth-crusts and mantles, deep space, inner space and outer space, the very interior of cauldron-planet Earth. This is simply all made up and accepted. Until we break the confines of thinking that only past, present, and future exist, in some weird, strong and steady way, we will remain trapped. Instead, realize, all 'time' is all 'time' at once, overlapping, current and moving, all of the Being Now, the moment; which is not 'moment' at all. Cannot be quantified or calculated rightly. All is wrong.


Let's use examples : a mayoral or a gubernatorial race, for instance. It's all played up, everyone gets their own sort of bombast in, cheesy issues, things without any good sense or decorum. Newspapers write it all up, news covers it in all the newsy forms, writers write of it, delving into their own interests to make the twist, highlighting their own biases and assumptions so as to write their features about things that, in reality, simply do not exist. They are just manufactured news issues and narrative composed to 'move' a mythic and myopic storyline cross. Nothing is real  -  people become 'types', are shown as only that they 'represent', are utilized to make other points, over and over and over. As this happens, again a reinforcement of the more grand consensus of falsity is built up and continued. As if to say 'fuck it all, I don't partake  -  I would refuse to take part, to assume the narrative or to examine the pretenses  -  which is all they are. The abuse of both thought and language is dismal, sour and sad. Or, another case, you put classical radio on, and they are playing, say, another version of Claire de Lune, by someone at a keyboard, or Gymnopedie, or whatever  -  whatever it is it's music all enhanced with the words and assumptions which both preceded it and then are used to underscore it, reinterpreting for you what you just heard  -  destroying any magical moment of it  -  lists of who and what, which number, what tempo and how long. It cannot hold; quite simply and that is all. It goes like that for everything, right down to the wittiest of the Wittgenstein versions of language, word and interpretation of Reality and Life and Cosmos  - which all begs its existence to frame itself only by the words and the concepts in play. Like a speeding atom, not really speeding at all, we are turned and pivoted all while remaining in place. Our Kings and our Rulers are these assumptions and those who present these Assumptions to us to make our world : school, home, church, stage, business, death, arena, theater, university and tomb. All together now, 1,2,3,4...

So the real reason for all this, even back then, was pretty much hidden, or kept away from public manifestation.  the Mercury Space Program, Friendship 7, a book by the 'original' astronauts entitles 'We Seven'  -  this was all part of the salve to smooth over to an unentitled nation of 1959 dolts what was about to happen to them. Everything was presented sunnily, with goodness and happiness built in. It's all still present : the befuddlement, the randomness of what went on. Old timers now, dying by the day, those people who remember, they remember this : a roar in the ocean, a bullet in the head, Lee Harvey Oswald getting shot in public, Jack Ruby laughing it off, Texas cronies masturbating each other with facsimiles each of their own foul truths, a nation collectively crying, watching, not understanding, being told to grieve, watching some more  -  pink dress, blood stains, Vietnam, carnage, men and boys with heads and brains and limbs blown off, landscapes destroyed, napalm and firestorms and B-52 bombers simply obliterating fields, hills, mountains and meadows, people with skin on fire, self-righteous bums in suits and ties talking to cameras, rigorous re-tellings of the military myths of might and right and protocol and discipline, rumor-mongering, hate, water-cannons, dogs, killings, Schwerner, Chaney and Goodman: Michael Schwerner - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia . I'll stop there. If you can't take it yourself now, from this point, you don't deserve the high marks you're given. This stuff was all mass-cult by then; you couldn't avoid it. Dan Rather and Walter Cronkite, to name just two latecomers back then, learned quickly how to ride the crest, put it all together, stay involved in the duplicitous peddling of lies and fabrications, and then properly cover all this. They made careers out of this crap, big-time careers, and so did  many others as the entire 'industry' of this crap-peddling took off, grew and prospered. It was all done, and done well, for years and years. by today's late date a lot of this edifice has crumbled, as the world has moved onto other points of view it's mostly supplanted all of this now quite simply with distraction, still one further remove from the Being of Truth and fact. All that is nothing at all. No one needs to be TOLD what to be told anymore, they just tell it themselves, move the crud another step outward  -  an unwitting and un-examining mass of idiots laps it all up.
I was always in love with words, and just used them up  -  playing with them, rearranging things, finding, if I could, the concepts behind them. The deep study of Latin was a grand help  -   by it I was able to break apart words, see the genesis of what we take for granted, understand how they were 'grafted' onto to one another  in order to make the things we know today  -  all mystery, all cleverly intriguing in the overlap of bringing to us what we know now. A lot of this I just did on my own, but it was intensive. The word 'today' for instance. I worked on this one long bus ride back to the seminary, from the New Brunswick bus station. I had been driven there by my seminary friend's father  -  who took us both there in one car. The kid's name was James Cruise, I don't really know much else about him  -  I know where he lived, how our lives briefly overlapped and intertwined, I knew his parents and a sister, knew his house, a few of his habits and things, but that was it. Only by the grace of the seminary, and these seminary years, did I ever know him at all. Anyway, during the car ride (I can recall it vividly), the left-turn from Avenel Street onto Route One to head south to New Brunswick (10 or 12 miles) was made, they were talking back and forth about something (it always seemed to me that other boys always had a far better rapport with their fathers than I did with mine  -  they were always talking, having regular discussions, interesting each other in each other. None of that ever happened for me  -   it was usually morose, or snarling, or yelling...or silence. Too bad, I guess). As they were talking, somehow the word 'today' came up and it (the word) caught my attention. It stopped me short and was all I needed to begin breaking it apart, noting things for follow-up, etc., so that when I got back to my Latin reference books I could work it through. It went like this, just to show an example. It's very simple really: the word 'today' which we use as 'today', now, etc., is a rendering in English, broken down over time and by use, from 'this day' to 'today'. In Latin, the word is 'hodie', the component parts of which are, in reality, nothing more than 'hoc', meaning 'this, and 'die' (pronounced 'dee-ay'), meaning 'day'. So, you see, hodie, was transformed back over into our language as today. Probably doesn't bowl you over as it did me, but that's OK. My gifted love for writing words and the language entailed within all that absorbed me; I almost want to  say 'kept me entertained' but it was more than that. It was a Science, a science of thought and meaning, working together. It makes me what I am today. What was that, a guffaw? Go screw yourself, Archimedes.


74. A few things always jumped out at me; deliberation was one of them. I used to look at those science photos that one would see back then and understand immediately the ploy underway. Anything appears odd or strange when seen in intense close up. It was really telling me, or anyone, nothing at all. It was a specious approach by Science, or whatever power was doing it, to baffle and amaze with a sort of majestic 'look at us' wonder. It's sort of the same thing that Authority has always done  -  ermine robes and tiaras and crowns and scepters, all of that which goes into the keeping of the dispossessed down, and in 'awe' of the magic of Authority. So much of everything starts from this. Bunkum everywhere. In my seminary years, far enough from Avenel so as to remain distinct to me, I can always remember that little chapel building : we'd assemble as a group, en masse, and enter at 6:30am, into a small, very plain and wooden chapel  -  sort of a connected bungalow style building, right into the freshman dorms at one end and the refectory, or eating hall, at the other. A few very basic attempts at stained glass windows, simple pews, views out to fields and trees. Some Winter mornings it would be downright freezing in there. But I remember things well : Chuck Waddell, that super serious and extremely pious boy from Delaware, always staying behind, always very hard at work, on his knees, at prayer  -  not just 'prayer' but the very singular prayer of his own extension all the while mouthing the words to himself, aloud but without sound. Always curious to me. What was this guy about? But even more than that I recall the very tall altar candles arrayed on each side of the otherwise plain altar (the entire thing had the character of some wood-lodge, summer-camp chapel actually). Each week a different seminarian would be selected to be the lighter, and the extinguisher, of these candles  -  which meant that a long-handled, gold metal implement made specifically for the long reach of church candles was used. It was a glorious thing :  walking in front of everyone before and after the mass, to light and then extinguish those tall and large candles in their stands. It was part of the mystique and mystery the entire operation somehow exuded. No wonder, perhaps, Chuck Waddell was always speechless and in awe. From Avenel to the seminary was a pretty simple reach  -  both places were somehow doing the same thing but in their own different ways. One's sacrament of wonder was the bulldozer and the crane; the other used candelabras and chapels.
It was always kind of funny for me to realize how it goes with the 'history' of places. Woodbridge and Avenel were peppered with these tiny ideas of itself as a 'place' that used to be  -  but only the small, historical types knew of it. Now it's different  -  there are markers and historic posts about this and that. People put a glide on things  -  pretending. None of it has any reality  -  they make up all these stories from the most basic rudiments. Parker Press. Valentine Brick. Bitting's Brewery. There are kernels of truth, only kernels, to all of this  -  but they erect stories and edifices. I didn't know what to do about it. I just watched. There was a woman around town named Ruth Wolk  -  an annoying smidgeon of a woman, proud of herself and proud of her search for 'history'  -  but it all had to be right, had to fit her design first, except for that it wasn't history. She wrote a few small, published, paper-back books with old photos and tales and stories of 'Woodbridge Township'  -  collections of old photos, small stories, tales and captions, and mostly ideas of the grand, older, days of a construct she named 'Woodbridge'. It was all of her own making  -  and she was a complicit in it as anyone else. She'd write of fine old, secluded homes, farmland and grassy lanes. She'd write of wells and water-sources, small knots of people organizing to do something authentic and real. yet, at the end of the same blurb, she'd boast of the now 'grand' Woodbridge, how it was turned into parking lots, shopping, roadways and large organizations of political and civic  -  and school  -  groups. her impetus and focus, as is most usual for these sorts of people, was on organized schooling : grandiosity over Boards of Education, new, grand schoolhouses and collectivized districts and regionalized high schools and all that. Everything headed in the complete other direction of the tiny porridge she'd just been brewing  -  seeking instead consolidation, hugeness, organization, a centralized, authority-down sequence of limit and control. I never figured any of that out, nor did I understand where all these people, with their bizarre attitudes and ideas, had come from : I knew the clutch of them., mostly  -  temple dwellers from the older, centralized yet small, Woodbridge. But they were just as intent on turning everything away, making it bad, tweaking it to their higher levels of regal and splendiferous (vain) authority and centralization. the world was turning and spinning fast  -  all things were being altered.
There were two churches, catholic ones anyway, in Avenel. When we first moved there, the original church building was on Avenel street. It was a pretty simple, small and ordinary church sort of brick structure; very nice actually. It faced the main street of the simple town; it was a 'satellite' parish or mission/outreach of Woodbridge's St. James Church  -  an outpost for the burgeoning population of the developing swamplands which were Avenel. In about three years the parish had outgrown its church, and a larger, more modern 'church-by-churchbook design book' structure was in place, destroying the woods behind the older church which still stood and was left standing for some 8 or so years  -  used as a gym, social center for kids, basketball hall, etc. A total mish-mash. Boy Scout meetings in the basement, once a 'catholic' troop 73 had been established to debunk the nearby Presbyterian troop 42, of longer-standing, and more manly, proportions (tougher kids). It wasn't really as if, in Boston or somewhere like that, the lines separating the religious parts of town meant anything. They meant nothing at all  -  it was mostly in the addled brains of parents and/or old-timers from other places; people who kept such scores, who marked these things down. All of us kids, we'd run together no matter who or what  -  most of it could be described as dastardly stuff anyway so what matter is it in a religious context anyway. Breaking into the here or there abandoned house, wrecking what we saw, destroying plates and dishes, flinging old 78's (hard, black, thick plastic that smashed like glass) into trees and walls, entering the rears of the varied junkyards just to outwit the mad, junkyard dogs and destroy windshields, smash lights, wreck otherwise already wrecked cars. We'd smash windows where we could, slingshot rocks and pebbles into things, use various firecrackers and other small means of explosive, as kids are wont to do, I guess, to blow things up, main or slaughter small animals, running through the woods with bows and arrows set for squirrels, birds, or any other small ground animal  - whish as far as out kid-frenzy went, should be 'ground-up' animals anyway. It was crazy. It was bizarre and wrong, and sad too  -  as I think of it now I still shudder. What we were thinking, I'll never know. It certainly bore no semblance of either side of the stupid 'religious' divide which had been presented to us. Protestant dances, and Catholic dances. Protestant Boy Scouts and Catholic Boy Scouts. I mean, and still do, what the fuck? Whose strangely altered and medievalized thinking goes like that? You read of these sorts of things in the year 1410 or something, but this was 1950's Avenel, a shit-hole suburban, low-priced, swamp-infested  construction project in which people were supposed to live  -  living new lives, highly-stylized new lives, in fact, of ease and splendor, of toothpaste in tubes and butter in tubs, lightly whipped.
I never really wavered from my tasks. I would read the get-your-hands black (back then the ink used to rub off) 1960's, thin-columned, endlessly wordy New York Times, nightly. Spread out on my hard-tiled floor in my room upstairs, I'd read page after page items about far-off places, the mechanizations of men, Congo, Asia, China, Soviets, space-competitions, Nazi-history investigations, auto-industry items. Until late at night  -  oftentimes my wearied mother would climb the stairs, knock and open the door, and quizzically look at what I was doing, reading on the floor some stupidity like a scribe, shake her head, and tell me it was late and that I should get to sleep. There was an endless war or skirmish always underway somewhere  -  Brazzaville, all of Africa, Congo, Swaziland, Taiwan vs. mainland China, Appalachian poverty and problems right at home in the USA, civil rights troubles, school desegregation, slums, urban renewal, everything all a -twirl at the same moment. Something big was brewing; I could feel it, I could already understand it, but just wasn't sure of the approach. Life. death. Little mattered. Occasionally things would pop up; my own ideas and interpretations : 'desegregation'  -  using such a word, I felt, was wrong  -  it somehow made valid the existence of 'segregation', assuming all one had to do was correct it, as without changing it or re-formulating first the dumb way people thought. Thinking about what I read of those weird, odd southerners and all their 'separate' Woolworth's food counters, restaurants and bathrooms and water fountains, I would just think  -  what's wrong with these asshole people? How stupid could a people be? What race of Neanderthals had they themselves descended from that they could still subsist in this manner  -  their screaming diatribes, shouting at schoolbuses and children, protecting their own supposed 'rights' (which did not really exist anyway). These were supposed adults  -  grown and mature people who were assumed ready to lead others. They turned out to all be liars and jerks. I found that money and corruption left its presence everywhere. African-bound cargoes of foods and medicines, large sums of monies, all stolen, swept away by corrupt leaders of corrupt governments run my small mobs of corrupt people. Theft and malfeasance were everywhere. The dead and the dying loomed as a result. War was nothing. War had just become a cover, an excuse for cover  -  to cover and obscure the thievery and corruption wherever it could be concealed. Nothing was straight, people were crooked bastards, mostly moreso the nearer to the top one got  -  this went for the USA too; no distinctions made.
When you're 12 years old I don't think you're supposed to have already reached the point of saying 'Oh, what the hell...' It seems way to early to find futility and the grassy island of doubt so soon and already sidelining you. It's a tough thing to get over : it affects how you can talk and honor and respond to things. I had to carry that around. Boyhood fades; the world intrudes. How was I supposed to observe or see or watch things in that condition? The stupidity of a symbolic thing, like the CBS Eye, as a for instance  -  something everyone else accepted and looked for. This little place I was in  -  a thin strip of street not even a commercial street any longer  -  barren, derelict, cut in two by roadways, a lumber yard, a train station seemingly now an afterthought (everyone had their flashy cars to ride in instead), two or three 'candy' stores, selling nothing more than leftover pennypacks  -  it was really a non-entity, a no-connected nowheresville. I was ready to cash out. Had I been 4 years older, I would have just jumped a train (not 'in front of', just jumped on), or hitch-hiked Route One and disappeared. As it were I worked hard on finding other ways to get out. Hello Blackwood, I suppose.
I've found most of life to be a symbolic reality  -  people placing space and the things they do into mental landscapes which  -  while not real at all  -  reach the level of 'real' by fulfilling symbolic needs. This can be argued all day  -  and I'd probably be the first to do it  -  but I am certain I could argue it to a perfect clarity and win. As I was growing up, the street I lived on had, as well and for itself, attained that level of being  -  it was a line of houses to which was attached a serial decision-making for the placement of like and symbolic items by each family, random or not, along the way. A sameness in cars : boats, pools, lawns, driveways, furniture, decks and patios (New Jersey patios, I always thought, bring a certain 'patois'). Symbolic preferences for lives not really lived; references too, I suppose. Nothing on Inman Avenue bore any real substance, it all seemed image and symbol. The time of being  -  the 1950's, the 1960's  -  were in fact completely artificial and symbolic anyway : everything managed to be, to exist, from nothing and completely artificial and meaningless. Yes, that still goes on today, of course, but all things are different and done differently. The essential basis 'within a reality of' its own' Earthness and substance (that thing we, back then, were just leaving) is all gone - everything is ephemeral and virtual and ethereal, and yet today's 'folk' can make no distinction on that level at all. They just live it. Art and re-purposing buildings in a world that has so little to say but so many ways of saying it  -  (nothing). So many people live amidst a symbolic reality of their own into which and through which function very well and feel quite satisfied, though without knowing. Quite discursive, no matter.
In looking back it's a little bit amazing to see how much of all my father/grandfather stuff, in a vaguely humorous way, has to do really with the vagaries of Robert Moses : grand enforcer and builder of highways, bridges and tunnels. My Aunt Mae told me she remembers  -  as a young girl  -  a burial of her father (that absent 'grandfather' of mine at 116th street) - one Giuseppe Entrona  -  was at ground level and next to a busy highway. years now have elapsed (1945 or so) and somewhere over that time the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway has been rebuilt, enlarged and elevated, high over this particular cemetery segment. The roadway once at ground level is now high in the sky. The trestles are above now the whines of the highway and the groans of the junkyards and scrapheaps below. The actual grave is now a mere smidge along the cramped, brick footing of the overpasses, a sort of center-alley walkway of dark, looming brick. It's all a very strange place, yet blighted and boring in its way too. In my mind I go back there, only in memory, trying to recall the old scenes gone by  -  perhaps when there were trees and shrubbery (there are none now, on this flat, treeless, ugly plain). Do dreams have memories too, or do memories dream? Whatever it is, this vague portion of the 'Introne' interdict lies here, still and rank, beneath a highway and lost in a place once bucolic and serene but now ravaged by the tempests of time and value and violence and ruin. Robert Moses be damned. Giuseppe Entrona too. Whatever any of it all is, it is for certain that nothing now exists at ground level and  -  yes  -  all things are elevated.
In my 1950's there was pretty much nothing. I was not so much held back by my inadequacies as just kept in place to the fullness of the little I had.  My father went through any number of automobiles, swapped engines, did brakes, etc., when he had to  -   he had rental car replacements for mechanic-repairs (I remember well an quaint old '53 Dodge he had for a week or two  -  faded green, ram's head in metal and chrome, soiled on the hood. It shook tremendously as it neared 50 mph, and all that was accepted  -  this great little clunk of a tough vehicle, hunkering down the slower highways and byways of that time. it was fun, and a good memory). My father had erected an engine hoist in the rear yard, at the end of the driveway  -  a few times entire engines were just switched, as a Saturday and a Sunday's task. Wonderment and awe sometimes, by me as I watched him at work. I don't know what people do now, but I know they don't do that. The modern day, by contrast, is a brittle and bright mirror  - composed of the reflection it is supposed to be reflecting. They call it, perhaps, ethereal, virtual, unreal. Maybe that's the case, and they can have it. If so, I want nothing of it. Quiet has to bespeak quiet; it needs a strength and a presence of its own. The 'life-as-a-pale-reflection-of-God' thing works far better than today's mastiff-mankind, king of all matter rap. Anyway, in today's world that's the entire white left speaking, and nothing else. No one knows; they just blather on. Mostly evil and cheesy (though one cannot say that), and mostly for money. Lucre is King. God and Mammon  -  are the same thing. The whole guilt and soft-doubt, whole-foods, artisan and craft debauchery are where modern anti-culture has amassed its goods. We now have to listen to the paradoxical dichotomy of a reasoned, half-crazy mind, of whatever nationality and color all melded, using patience, sentiment and logic to forestall any creative progress, make it stop or put it on hold anyway, while violence and vulgarity make sport of the entire mad, insane nuthouse  -  a governmental, medical and military and religious complex raring more and more to be on its way. Trying to thwart now a thundering global collapse of its own house of cards. A House of Panic instead. It seems now that people can only seek 'product', as it's now called, and their 'product' is a weird combination of waste and war unleashed, speed and restlessness, anger, sex, and mayhem. But that apparently now satisfies the world. This world is but a shadow, come to hide and conceal all other things  -  the nervous restlessness has no one settling in place, just constantly moving along some media-boosted continuum. It's so far unlike the 'old' days that I'm here writing of as to be insipid and sad at the same time, as if the shirt had no collar and no sleeves but was still to be called a 'shirt'. You'd better look up Confucius on that one; see his 'Rectification of Names' theory. If you call something, in error, that which it no longer is, you will, at the least, lose harmony. At worse, you will die.
Other cards are being drawn; the hands are held. In this moment, the cards and hands are being arranged on a table-top, whence all will see them  -  before the real fire of their burning begins. It cannot be held back. It is harsh and impossible to forestall. And if it was anyway, they would have that person's head. Whoever it was who was stopping it. Anti-Christ, Mammon, or ritualized 'God'; all the same. Sometimes Satan comes in the name of the Lord.


75. Like the Copernican revolution, mankind itself will need to come to grips with itself not being the summit of creation : the center of the natural world. An optimistic, naive account of unlimited human potential based upon an ever-present and active God makes no sense, except as comfort food. And this view it pains me very much to have to proclaim and adopt. The best parts of me therefore fight it as theory, and seek proof of that activity, of a benign activity, stepping in, changing things as needed, interdicting, if you will, the stage of events through the mingling stronghold of a physical Deity. Which of course does not occur and for which the mind fights. Truly, there is little of logic here, nor within any of this quaint logic of thinking. My earliest days. in Avenel. had been placed in a location where no one thought thoughts such as that. It made me vulnerable, anxious and self-conscious. Part of the varied reasons, I am sure, why I got out, and so early on.
I was never able to properly separate what I was feeling from what I was living around myself. To me they always seemed as two, completely separate divergences  -  and my loyalty was not to the latter. Some will say that's a 'romantic' attraction to living, in the old vein of the grand Romantics of art, music, dance and writing. I wouldn't know any of that  -  as I see it those folks were all pretty one-dimensional in the way they thought of things  -  emotive, over-whelming, gung-ho. I'm not any of that  -  rather cold, removed, steely, aloof. So, that's another divergence I could never deal with  -  more to keep me apart, lone and solitary. I never understood, nor was I understood. Poor, poor pitiful me? No,  I don't think so. Poor, poor pitiful everybody else.
At 12th and 13th Streets, The New School  -  once 'The New School for Social Research', and, originally, in 1933, 'The University of Exiles', had a few buildings fronting the streets. Incongruously, in the 1960's and '70's, built in some 1940's style of a steel and glass modernity  -  faintly Bauhaus perhaps  -  but which never really fit the place nor made mark of what it was trying to do or say. Vietnam protest renegade and one time US Attorney General under Lyndon Johnson, Ramsey Clark, kept an office on the 2nd or 3rd floor there during the time he taught. The office, with its books and papers, could be seen up there, behind the window glass. I never went in, nor visited, but during that time (times I did gaze up so wistfully from the street below), about 1972, I was much in contact with, at Cornell University, in Ithaca, a Philippine leader-in-exile named Raul Manglapus. He was about  -  as I've previously treated  -  20 miles away from Elmira, at Cornell, when I was living in Elmira during those years. Between the three of us (myself, Manglapus, and Ramsey Clark), in those erratic, waning years of the stupid and pathetic Marcos dictatorship in the Philippines, we spent much time, by letter and phone mostly, planning or at least trying to 'figure' the means of overthrow and the toppling of Marcos and his replacement by Manglapus  -  who was at that time, having been exiled from the Philippines and picked up by Cornell for an exile-position as academic/university staff. He taught at Cornell. While he did so, he was a very active presence and spearheaded an exile government-in-waiting, and a rather strong subversive movement seeking to implement the overthrow of the Marcos regime  -  which regime was fully backed, secured, financed and bolstered in all effects by the US Government  - which Government wished to know no other manner nor means of governance for the Philippines, which it considered its own Christian, safe and secure foothold in South Asia against the onslaught of the sprawling communist tendrils fanning out from all those imagined and 'usual' suspect places  -  the Indonesian archipelago, the Soviet Union, and China too. This vast American underwriting became a joke, a parody of itself after a while, the fact being that it had all gone to their heads  -  Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos were in no way representative of any form of Christian or Democratic ideals. They were insane. Their country had become a military and civilian pressure-cooker, operated as a police-state, repressive, materialistic, vain and corrupt. Corrupt would need a capital letter here, for sure. The entire operation, for the US and its contractors, and the police state behind it, was a huge pudding of money and graft. it was unstoppable, all through those years of the 1970's. Manglapus, as well as Ramsey Clark, nonetheless discussed operational, legal and alternate methods of overthrowing the regime. It was a difficult time, and many letter-writings and conversations with Manglapus went back and forth, mostly declaiming the perverse power held by Marcos, and the position of the USA power structure vis a vis the governance of the Philippines, to wit: "The Marcos regime is seen as representative figures of American democracy in action, and the 'values' which go with it, against the encroachments in south and southeast Asia of both Soviet Russia and Communist China  -  huge, feuding and lumbering societies of filth and disgust thought somehow to be of 'superpower' status." I always thought, in those years, that 'possession of the bomb' was really the one criteria that the world went by  -  but now I'm not so sure. The bomb's still contentious, though it's no longer called that; but there are other things now  -  torture and terrorism, media control, imprisoning dissident voices, killing opponents, that's pretty much also an equal part of the equation. Back then I'm not sure what Marcos did. Anyway, no one ever killed Manglapus. There was a relative sense of values back then  -  all things could be moved against each other, deals made, and the mouthpieces and liars would come to the fore and make it sound as they wanted it to sound. It never really suffices to just say 'you had to be there'  -  but in this case it's perhaps useful and right. Today's world just doesn't translate this well. Raul was trying to run a 'government-in-exile' from Ithaca, he himself having been exiled (expelled) a few years before, by the Marcos regime whereupon, after some time in NYC, Cornell University gave him a slot  -  I think in the History Dept. as I recall. Considered a leftist, he was also considered back then (not later on) as inimical to US interests in that it was all theoretical (his exile-government-in-waiting), had no currency (?), [I never knew what they anted, perhaps the printing of Manglapus notes in various denominations?], economic base, nor persons nor factuality. Running a government-in-exile (Movement For a Free Philippines was, ostensibly, the name of the movement, not the government to be) made moreso by, as he put it, having to be wary of Marcos (or US) henchmen always out to get him. I can't right now exactly remember how I ran across him other than that I did respond by note to an op-ed of some sort he'd written for the NYTimes, an then he responded to that. Seeing as how Elmira neighbored Ithaca, and I often visited Cornell University, where he was, once it got started it became easy. So, anyway, that's my Raul Manglapus story  -  a diffident and oddly beautiful time for me, in my later formative years. I enjoyed the contact and the names.
Cornell University was a pretty cool place  -  lot of crags and rocks, gorges and drop-offs. Kids jumping to their deaths often enough  -  romantic problems, pregnancies, bad exams,  insecurities and the rest. Now they've netted a lot of the gorges  -  you jump, you just get stuck farther down in a netting, looking like a fucking idiot. That'll teach you. Last time I was there (Fall/Thanksgiving, 2011) some guy bumming money from me took me instead on a tour, by his account anyway, with full narration, of the new nets and safeguards, with a history of the community's problems over the issue, the huge sums of monies involved, and the reactions and proceedings of the University itself on the issue. I gave him a buck for his troubles, and he still wouldn't leave. All that he said was either in good faith and real stuff, or complete bunkum  -  and I wouldn't know the difference anyway. It worked for me. There's a coffee shop, and a Starbucks across the street, right there, and I took him in, we had a cup of coffee, and just talked  -  he was an apparently local, homeless wreck. The funny thing was, he wasn't alone  -  there was another street-waif, much like him, who came in because of his absence, and discussed their 'shifts'. He wasn't due to come on for another 45 minutes, and there wasn't anyone 'there'  -  because the guy was inside here with me, for a dollar. They were losing money on this deal  -  so I said adios and let those two shamans get on with their work. Work? Better than jumping, I suppose, the telling about it instead.
In antiquity, humans sent plagues into cities by catapulting corpses over fortified walls. Now we have more cunning Trojan horses. Smallpox has been stashed in blankets, disguising disease as gifts of goodwill. How perverse is that? Still, these are crude and primitive attempts to set back time and harm the curve.  Now we have corporate sabotage, world hypnosis and ecological sabotage to deal with  -  biological defilement of forests, lakes, rivers and stream, to name just one plausible option. In 1960, I don't think any of this was current in idea or importance  -  the arc of things was upward, on and through any and all obstacles. Hanging around the basement bar, a drink or two into conversation  -  about the new car at the GM plant in Linden, or the 707 coming through Newark Airport  -  a polite and nicely curved argument for progress as a desirable, feminine attribute  -  all curves and hips and cleavage. Something men fall for, and still do. Now, in those same places, the older, decrepit and completely re-populated neighborhood is run over by Pakistanis, people from India and Sri Lanka and Russia, satellite dishes on the roof (my parents' old house, where I grew up, had three at one count in about 2011). Why? What to watch and to whose benefit? How distracted and other-oriented does one need to be? The world now is a colossal 'One'. Is that any better? I see no difference, which is baffling to me  -  the America arc has achieved itself and run out nits own course, and by achieving itself it has, as well, decimated itself, killed itself off. You can't complain, for fear of being labeled something. It's impossible to single out the Jews who run the provocative, vulgar and gross multi-layers of 'entertainment'  -  those who've polluted and ruined everything, making irony out of, even, defecating. You're simply labeled 'anti-Semitic' and you're, for all practical purposes, done. You can't clamor over the hordes of illegal little Mexicans overrunning every restaurant kitchen and back-service area, every landscape and tree-cutting operation, hanging like monkeys off trucks, defoliating and cutting every tree and shrub in the name of 'Landscape'  -  for which idiot people dole out big money  -  to make things as bleak as some desert plateau. Our old, American culture and ethos, for whatever reason and whatever it was, is completely foreign to them, and has been. We've given it all away  -  the taproot of subservience and submission has been allowed to grow. I rather think we still send plaques into cities, though by different means and  -  certainly  -  different sorts of plaques.
When I got to New York City and ended up on 11th Street, that street was a completely different street than it is now, or than anything you'd find there now on either side of it. The main component of the street was what was then called Puerto Rican. Back in those days, there were but a few strong and identifiable groups to contend with  -  Negroes (blacks, mostly of American descent, meaning descendants originally 17th and 18th-century African slaves, the sorts over whom the Civil war had occurred, who eventually migrated north, and to Chicago as well, to become 'ordinary' by today's standards American blacks. They lived in Negro ghettos, the places like Harlem and other spots, close-by, in tight-knit cultural groups  -  mostly downtrodden poor, beleaguered and sour. But the word used was Negro); Puerto Ricans, often just called Spics, who  -  in much the same way as blacks, populated parts of New York City with their own brash versions of poverty, culture, food and romance. Apart and separate, but OK too. It seemed all else, Germans, Italians, Hungarians, Poles, and the rest, somehow simply fell under the rubric of 'White'  -  the engrained American type. American, red, what, and blue, and all the rest. The Jewish people, as now, kept themselves apart too, in their own places and ways.None of it made any sense. But, no matter, 11th street was totally 'Spic' territory. Into that, I moved  -  stairways of strange smells, people milling about, tight-fitting clothing, temptresses as sisters and girlfriends, an entire open and outdoor culture. One I'd not really seen before. It didn't bother or affect me. I took it all in stride  -  those first few weeks it seemed a zillion degrees, hot, hot Summer, people hanging out in an intense heat, almost half-clothed, kids screaming. The nearby schoolyard, empty then, as school was closed, by mid-September had become itself another roiling, crowded asphalt beach of period-timed groups of screaming, writhing kids. I never realized how often people propagated, though, judging from the looks of things, I should have known right off that sex had to be a mainstay of activity. Impulsive. Allowed. Cheap or free. And truly, within this culture then, without much in the way of 'responsibility.' You pick things up as you go along  -  and that's how it went for me; so that, before long, it all seemed quite natural, as if I'd lived among this my entire life. 11th Street itself had no panache at all, never had, except for Paradise Alley, adjacent to my building  -  which 'Alley' was legendary. Beatnik lore; stories of it abounded, references a'plenty in Beatnik memoirs and the lie. And there I was, right next to it, when it was all gone  -  a shitty hulk of itself, an empty passion of crumbling walls and some leftover brick, a motorcycle courtyard ravaged by punks and biker hoodlums. All the backstory was somehow gone. Funny how things like that happen. After a while, who knows what? No one knows but nothing. Just one over, 10th street, to the west, had been an artistic haven  -  all those 1940's people had painted and lived in their spaces and apartments, and made art galleries of the brownstone fronts and buildings  -  to the point where 10th street had become, for a while, its own little art district. Some of that still lingered, and I loved those old spaces  -  whitewashed walls, old steps and walkups, windows showing things  -  art and fixtures, bold and energetic references of things sculptural, strong and spiritual too. that world was gone away, over  -  as if all real Being and Presence had been drained, by 1966, from it and all that was left was some old ghost, lost amid a swirl of deals and money. Everyone by then was on the make. everything needed a name and a label, a perch upon which to be viewed. it had to 'be' something first, and then be 'owned' by someone 'special, second. Soon enough, the bastardization of labels like 'Pop' and 'Op' and 'Minimal' and then 'Conceptual', each one a term one more step way from the real and original idea of art, on a shape, maybe even framed, simply or not, and hanging on  a wall. coy and ironic had to be the new watchwords. it was hurtful and false. I never went for it and I rued as well the day when places like Tenth street began disappearing. Commercial districts and all the tarts involved in manipulating and people that milieu took over. The turds of Elaine's and Max's Kansas City and el Quixote had soon taken it all over  -  art as entertainment. Art as sex, and perversion. All a Queerdom of its own.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?